Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty

The Antarctic Ice Sheet represents the largest source of uncertainty in future sea level rise projections, with a contribution to sea level by 2100 ranging from −5 to 43 cm of sea level equivalent under high carbon emission scenarios estimated by the recent Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Seroussi, Hélène, Verjans, Vincent, Nowicki, Sophie, Payne, Antony J, Goelzer, Heiko, Lipscomb, William H, Abe-Ouchi, Ayako, Agosta, Cécile, Albrecht, Torsten, Asay-Davis, Xylar, Barthel, Alice, Calov, Reinhard, Cullather, Richard, Dumas, Christophe, Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K, Gladstone, Rupert, Golledge, Nicholas R, Gregory, Jonathan M, Greve, Ralf, Hattermann, Tore, Hoffman, Matthew J, Humbert, Angelika, Huybrechts, Philippe, Jourdain, Nicolas C, Kleiner, Thomas, Larour, Eric, Leguy, Gunter R, Lowry, Daniel P, Little, Chistopher M, Morlighem, Mathieu, Pattyn, Frank, Pelle, Tyler, Price, Stephen F, Quiquet, Aurélien, Reese, Ronja, Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne, Shepherd, Andrew, Simon, Erika, Smith, Robin S, Straneo, Fiammetta, Sun, Sainan, Trusel, Luke D, Van Breedam, Jonas, Van Katwyk, Peter, van de Wal, Roderik S. W, Winkelmann, Ricarda, Zhao, Chen, Zhang, Tong, Zwinger, Thomas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)
Subjects:
450
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/91357
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023
id fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/91357
record_format openpolar
spelling fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/91357 2024-04-21T07:50:05+00:00 Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty Seroussi, Hélène Verjans, Vincent Nowicki, Sophie Payne, Antony J Goelzer, Heiko Lipscomb, William H Abe-Ouchi, Ayako Agosta, Cécile Albrecht, Torsten Asay-Davis, Xylar Barthel, Alice Calov, Reinhard Cullather, Richard Dumas, Christophe Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K Gladstone, Rupert Golledge, Nicholas R Gregory, Jonathan M Greve, Ralf Hattermann, Tore Hoffman, Matthew J Humbert, Angelika Huybrechts, Philippe Jourdain, Nicolas C Kleiner, Thomas Larour, Eric Leguy, Gunter R Lowry, Daniel P Little, Chistopher M Morlighem, Mathieu Pattyn, Frank Pelle, Tyler Price, Stephen F Quiquet, Aurélien Reese, Ronja Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne Shepherd, Andrew Simon, Erika Smith, Robin S Straneo, Fiammetta Sun, Sainan Trusel, Luke D Van Breedam, Jonas Van Katwyk, Peter van de Wal, Roderik S. W Winkelmann, Ricarda Zhao, Chen Zhang, Tong Zwinger, Thomas http://hdl.handle.net/2115/91357 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023 eng eng Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) http://hdl.handle.net/2115/91357 The Cryosphere, 17(12): 5197-5217 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 450 article fthokunivhus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023 2024-03-27T15:12:52Z The Antarctic Ice Sheet represents the largest source of uncertainty in future sea level rise projections, with a contribution to sea level by 2100 ranging from −5 to 43 cm of sea level equivalent under high carbon emission scenarios estimated by the recent Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). ISMIP6 highlighted the different behaviors of the East and West Antarctic ice sheets, as well as the possible role of increased surface mass balance in offsetting the dynamic ice loss in response to changing oceanic conditions in ice shelf cavities. However, the detailed contribution of individual glaciers, as well as the partitioning of uncertainty associated with this ensemble, have not yet been investigated. Here, we analyze the ISMIP6 results for high carbon emission scenarios, focusing on key glaciers around the Antarctic Ice Sheet, and we quantify their projected dynamic mass loss, defined here as mass loss through increased ice discharge into the ocean in response to changing oceanic conditions. We highlight glaciers contributing the most to sea level rise, as well as their vulnerability to changes in oceanic conditions. We then investigate the different sources of uncertainty and their relative role in projections, for the entire continent and for key individual glaciers. We show that, in addition to Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers in West Antarctica, Totten and Moscow University glaciers in East Antarctica present comparable future dynamic mass loss and high sensitivity to ice shelf basal melt. The overall uncertainty in additional dynamic mass loss in response to changing oceanic conditions, compared to a scenario with constant oceanic conditions, is dominated by the choice of ice sheet model, accounting for 52 % of the total uncertainty of the Antarctic dynamic mass loss in 2100. Its relative role for the most dynamic glaciers varies between 14 % for MacAyeal and Whillans ice streams and 56 % for Pine Island Glacier at the end of the century. The uncertainty associated with the choice of climate ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Pine Island Pine Island Glacier The Cryosphere West Antarctica Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) The Cryosphere 17 12 5197 5217
institution Open Polar
collection Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP)
op_collection_id fthokunivhus
language English
topic 450
spellingShingle 450
Seroussi, Hélène
Verjans, Vincent
Nowicki, Sophie
Payne, Antony J
Goelzer, Heiko
Lipscomb, William H
Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
Agosta, Cécile
Albrecht, Torsten
Asay-Davis, Xylar
Barthel, Alice
Calov, Reinhard
Cullather, Richard
Dumas, Christophe
Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K
Gladstone, Rupert
Golledge, Nicholas R
Gregory, Jonathan M
Greve, Ralf
Hattermann, Tore
Hoffman, Matthew J
Humbert, Angelika
Huybrechts, Philippe
Jourdain, Nicolas C
Kleiner, Thomas
Larour, Eric
Leguy, Gunter R
Lowry, Daniel P
Little, Chistopher M
Morlighem, Mathieu
Pattyn, Frank
Pelle, Tyler
Price, Stephen F
Quiquet, Aurélien
Reese, Ronja
Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne
Shepherd, Andrew
Simon, Erika
Smith, Robin S
Straneo, Fiammetta
Sun, Sainan
Trusel, Luke D
Van Breedam, Jonas
Van Katwyk, Peter
van de Wal, Roderik S. W
Winkelmann, Ricarda
Zhao, Chen
Zhang, Tong
Zwinger, Thomas
Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
topic_facet 450
description The Antarctic Ice Sheet represents the largest source of uncertainty in future sea level rise projections, with a contribution to sea level by 2100 ranging from −5 to 43 cm of sea level equivalent under high carbon emission scenarios estimated by the recent Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). ISMIP6 highlighted the different behaviors of the East and West Antarctic ice sheets, as well as the possible role of increased surface mass balance in offsetting the dynamic ice loss in response to changing oceanic conditions in ice shelf cavities. However, the detailed contribution of individual glaciers, as well as the partitioning of uncertainty associated with this ensemble, have not yet been investigated. Here, we analyze the ISMIP6 results for high carbon emission scenarios, focusing on key glaciers around the Antarctic Ice Sheet, and we quantify their projected dynamic mass loss, defined here as mass loss through increased ice discharge into the ocean in response to changing oceanic conditions. We highlight glaciers contributing the most to sea level rise, as well as their vulnerability to changes in oceanic conditions. We then investigate the different sources of uncertainty and their relative role in projections, for the entire continent and for key individual glaciers. We show that, in addition to Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers in West Antarctica, Totten and Moscow University glaciers in East Antarctica present comparable future dynamic mass loss and high sensitivity to ice shelf basal melt. The overall uncertainty in additional dynamic mass loss in response to changing oceanic conditions, compared to a scenario with constant oceanic conditions, is dominated by the choice of ice sheet model, accounting for 52 % of the total uncertainty of the Antarctic dynamic mass loss in 2100. Its relative role for the most dynamic glaciers varies between 14 % for MacAyeal and Whillans ice streams and 56 % for Pine Island Glacier at the end of the century. The uncertainty associated with the choice of climate ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Seroussi, Hélène
Verjans, Vincent
Nowicki, Sophie
Payne, Antony J
Goelzer, Heiko
Lipscomb, William H
Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
Agosta, Cécile
Albrecht, Torsten
Asay-Davis, Xylar
Barthel, Alice
Calov, Reinhard
Cullather, Richard
Dumas, Christophe
Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K
Gladstone, Rupert
Golledge, Nicholas R
Gregory, Jonathan M
Greve, Ralf
Hattermann, Tore
Hoffman, Matthew J
Humbert, Angelika
Huybrechts, Philippe
Jourdain, Nicolas C
Kleiner, Thomas
Larour, Eric
Leguy, Gunter R
Lowry, Daniel P
Little, Chistopher M
Morlighem, Mathieu
Pattyn, Frank
Pelle, Tyler
Price, Stephen F
Quiquet, Aurélien
Reese, Ronja
Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne
Shepherd, Andrew
Simon, Erika
Smith, Robin S
Straneo, Fiammetta
Sun, Sainan
Trusel, Luke D
Van Breedam, Jonas
Van Katwyk, Peter
van de Wal, Roderik S. W
Winkelmann, Ricarda
Zhao, Chen
Zhang, Tong
Zwinger, Thomas
author_facet Seroussi, Hélène
Verjans, Vincent
Nowicki, Sophie
Payne, Antony J
Goelzer, Heiko
Lipscomb, William H
Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
Agosta, Cécile
Albrecht, Torsten
Asay-Davis, Xylar
Barthel, Alice
Calov, Reinhard
Cullather, Richard
Dumas, Christophe
Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K
Gladstone, Rupert
Golledge, Nicholas R
Gregory, Jonathan M
Greve, Ralf
Hattermann, Tore
Hoffman, Matthew J
Humbert, Angelika
Huybrechts, Philippe
Jourdain, Nicolas C
Kleiner, Thomas
Larour, Eric
Leguy, Gunter R
Lowry, Daniel P
Little, Chistopher M
Morlighem, Mathieu
Pattyn, Frank
Pelle, Tyler
Price, Stephen F
Quiquet, Aurélien
Reese, Ronja
Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne
Shepherd, Andrew
Simon, Erika
Smith, Robin S
Straneo, Fiammetta
Sun, Sainan
Trusel, Luke D
Van Breedam, Jonas
Van Katwyk, Peter
van de Wal, Roderik S. W
Winkelmann, Ricarda
Zhao, Chen
Zhang, Tong
Zwinger, Thomas
author_sort Seroussi, Hélène
title Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_short Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_full Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_fullStr Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_sort insights into the vulnerability of antarctic glaciers from the ismip6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
publisher Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)
url http://hdl.handle.net/2115/91357
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
The Cryosphere
West Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
The Cryosphere
West Antarctica
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2115/91357
The Cryosphere, 17(12): 5197-5217
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 17
container_issue 12
container_start_page 5197
op_container_end_page 5217
_version_ 1796933950582554624