コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法
The present paper considers the affixes -lʕ (LH), -jo-lqəl (JQ), which derive agentive/patientive nouns, -ɣiŋ (GN), which derive action nouns, and ɣe-/ɣa- (GA) and n- (N), which derive adjectival participles in Koryak, and examines the morphological and syntactic differences, as well as similarities...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Japanese |
Published: |
日本北方言語学会
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80947 |
id |
fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/80947 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/80947 2023-05-15T17:05:20+02:00 コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 Nominal Usage for Denoting Events in Koryak 呉人, 惠 http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80947 jpn jpn 日本北方言語学会 http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80947 北方言語研究, 11: 37-54 コリャーク語 デキゴト 名詞的用法 事象叙述との対立 800 bulletin (article) fthokunivhus 2022-11-18T01:06:22Z The present paper considers the affixes -lʕ (LH), -jo-lqəl (JQ), which derive agentive/patientive nouns, -ɣiŋ (GN), which derive action nouns, and ɣe-/ɣa- (GA) and n- (N), which derive adjectival participles in Koryak, and examines the morphological and syntactic differences, as well as similarities between them. It also explores the features and meanings common to these seemingly unrelated forms when becoming predicates in the main clause. Consequently, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) LH, JQ, and GN inflect according to cases and become an argument, while GA and N cannot. However, they all receive number and person markings like ordinary nouns. In this respect, they are all nominals. (2) When these forms become a predicate in the main clause, LH, JQ, and GN represent evaluative modalities such as non-permission, schedule, and obligation. GA represents ‘fact predication,’ which sees events as fixed facts that are not limited to time, and N represents ‘property predication,’ which denotes the permanent attributes of things. (3) In fact, these seemingly unrelated meanings, such as the evaluative modality, fact predication, and property predication, are all common in that they all capture events as fixed and time-stable phenomena that are not limited to time. In this respect, they are in opposition with ‘event predication,’ which captures events in the flow of time. That is, it is considered that these nominal forms, such as LH, JQ, GN, GA, and N, complement the semantic areas that cannot be covered by the event prediction expressed by finite verbs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Koryak Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) |
op_collection_id |
fthokunivhus |
language |
Japanese |
topic |
コリャーク語 デキゴト 名詞的用法 事象叙述との対立 800 |
spellingShingle |
コリャーク語 デキゴト 名詞的用法 事象叙述との対立 800 呉人, 惠 コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
topic_facet |
コリャーク語 デキゴト 名詞的用法 事象叙述との対立 800 |
description |
The present paper considers the affixes -lʕ (LH), -jo-lqəl (JQ), which derive agentive/patientive nouns, -ɣiŋ (GN), which derive action nouns, and ɣe-/ɣa- (GA) and n- (N), which derive adjectival participles in Koryak, and examines the morphological and syntactic differences, as well as similarities between them. It also explores the features and meanings common to these seemingly unrelated forms when becoming predicates in the main clause. Consequently, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) LH, JQ, and GN inflect according to cases and become an argument, while GA and N cannot. However, they all receive number and person markings like ordinary nouns. In this respect, they are all nominals. (2) When these forms become a predicate in the main clause, LH, JQ, and GN represent evaluative modalities such as non-permission, schedule, and obligation. GA represents ‘fact predication,’ which sees events as fixed facts that are not limited to time, and N represents ‘property predication,’ which denotes the permanent attributes of things. (3) In fact, these seemingly unrelated meanings, such as the evaluative modality, fact predication, and property predication, are all common in that they all capture events as fixed and time-stable phenomena that are not limited to time. In this respect, they are in opposition with ‘event predication,’ which captures events in the flow of time. That is, it is considered that these nominal forms, such as LH, JQ, GN, GA, and N, complement the semantic areas that cannot be covered by the event prediction expressed by finite verbs. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
呉人, 惠 |
author_facet |
呉人, 惠 |
author_sort |
呉人, 惠 |
title |
コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
title_short |
コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
title_full |
コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
title_fullStr |
コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
title_full_unstemmed |
コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
title_sort |
コリャーク語のデキゴトを表わす名詞的用法 |
publisher |
日本北方言語学会 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80947 |
genre |
Koryak |
genre_facet |
Koryak |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80947 北方言語研究, 11: 37-54 |
_version_ |
1766059841987543040 |