Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect

Signal leakage between the land and ocean is a challenge in using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation data to study global mass redistributions. Although the leakage occurs in both directions, more attention has been paid to the land-to-ocean leakage and less to the ocean-to-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: Heki, Kosuke, Yi, Shuang
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press
Subjects:
450
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80484
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
id fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/80484
record_format openpolar
spelling fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/80484 2023-05-15T15:11:01+02:00 Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect Heki, Kosuke Yi, Shuang http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80484 https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022 eng eng Oxford University Press http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80484 Geophysical Journal International, 221(1): 603-616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022 This article has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Journal International ©:2020 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Global change from geodesy Satellite gravity Sea level change Time variable gravity 450 article fthokunivhus https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022 2022-11-18T01:06:16Z Signal leakage between the land and ocean is a challenge in using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation data to study global mass redistributions. Although the leakage occurs in both directions, more attention has been paid to the land-to-ocean leakage and less to the ocean-to-land leakage. Here, we show that the ocean-to-land leakage is non-uniform and non-negligible and propose a new forward modelling method to fully consider bi-directional leakages with the help of the global Ocean ReAnalysis System ORAS5. This observation-driven model could significantly reduce the variations in ocean grids and thus decrease the ocean-to-land leakage. The results with different treatment of the ocean signal leakage are compared. We find that failing to consider the ocean-to-land leakage will cause an underestimation of ∼20 per cent in the seasonal variation and will introduce a bias of several giga-tons in the secular trend. Although the uniform and non-uniform model have similar results in the global average of seasonal mass variations, the non-uniform ocean model is necessary in most places, especially near the Arctic Ocean, the Sea of Japan and the Gulf of Carpentaria. Despite these achievements, we also point out that there is still much room for improvement in ocean mass models, particularly in long-term trends. Our results indicate the importance of the ocean-to-land leakage correction in the mass estimation in coastal land areas using the GRACE data. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) Arctic Arctic Ocean Geophysical Journal International 221 1 603 616
institution Open Polar
collection Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP)
op_collection_id fthokunivhus
language English
topic Global change from geodesy
Satellite gravity
Sea level change
Time variable gravity
450
spellingShingle Global change from geodesy
Satellite gravity
Sea level change
Time variable gravity
450
Heki, Kosuke
Yi, Shuang
Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
topic_facet Global change from geodesy
Satellite gravity
Sea level change
Time variable gravity
450
description Signal leakage between the land and ocean is a challenge in using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation data to study global mass redistributions. Although the leakage occurs in both directions, more attention has been paid to the land-to-ocean leakage and less to the ocean-to-land leakage. Here, we show that the ocean-to-land leakage is non-uniform and non-negligible and propose a new forward modelling method to fully consider bi-directional leakages with the help of the global Ocean ReAnalysis System ORAS5. This observation-driven model could significantly reduce the variations in ocean grids and thus decrease the ocean-to-land leakage. The results with different treatment of the ocean signal leakage are compared. We find that failing to consider the ocean-to-land leakage will cause an underestimation of ∼20 per cent in the seasonal variation and will introduce a bias of several giga-tons in the secular trend. Although the uniform and non-uniform model have similar results in the global average of seasonal mass variations, the non-uniform ocean model is necessary in most places, especially near the Arctic Ocean, the Sea of Japan and the Gulf of Carpentaria. Despite these achievements, we also point out that there is still much room for improvement in ocean mass models, particularly in long-term trends. Our results indicate the importance of the ocean-to-land leakage correction in the mass estimation in coastal land areas using the GRACE data.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heki, Kosuke
Yi, Shuang
author_facet Heki, Kosuke
Yi, Shuang
author_sort Heki, Kosuke
title Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_short Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_full Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_fullStr Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_sort heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in grace observations and its leakage effect
publisher Oxford University Press
url http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80484
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80484
Geophysical Journal International, 221(1): 603-616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
op_rights This article has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Journal International ©:2020 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 221
container_issue 1
container_start_page 603
op_container_end_page 616
_version_ 1766341938631409664