Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics

A hierarchy of approximations of the force balance for the flow of grounded ice exists, ranging from the most sophisticated full Stokes (FS) formulation to the most simplified shallow ice approximation (SIA). Both are implemented in the ice flow model Elmer/Ice, and we compare them by applying the m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Seddik, Hakime, Greve, Ralf, Zwinger, Thomas, Sugiyama, Shin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/67131
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017
id fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/67131
record_format openpolar
spelling fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/67131 2023-05-15T13:51:33+02:00 Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics Seddik, Hakime Greve, Ralf Zwinger, Thomas Sugiyama, Shin http://hdl.handle.net/2115/67131 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017 eng eng Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) http://hdl.handle.net/2115/67131 The Cryosphere, 11(5): 2213-2229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY article fthokunivhus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017 2022-11-18T01:04:25Z A hierarchy of approximations of the force balance for the flow of grounded ice exists, ranging from the most sophisticated full Stokes (FS) formulation to the most simplified shallow ice approximation (SIA). Both are implemented in the ice flow model Elmer/Ice, and we compare them by applying the model to the East Antarctic Shirase drainage basin. First, we apply the control inverse method to infer the distribution of basal friction with FS. We then compare FS and SIA by simulating the flow of the drainage basin under present-day conditions and for three scenarios 100 years into the future defined by the SeaRISE (Sea-level Response to Ice Sheet Evolution) project. FS reproduces the observed flow pattern of the drainage basin well, in particular the zone of fast flow near the grounding line, while SIA generally overpredicts the surface velocities. As for the transient scenarios, the ice volume change (relative to the constantclimate control run) of the surface climate experiment is nearly the same for FS and SIA, while for the basal sliding experiment (halved basal friction), the ice volume change is 30% larger for SIA than for FS. This confirms findings of earlier studies that, in order to model ice sheet areas containing ice streams and outlet glaciers with high resolution and precision, careful consideration must be given to the choice of a suitable force balance. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet The Cryosphere Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) Antarctic East Antarctica The Cryosphere 11 5 2213 2229
institution Open Polar
collection Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP)
op_collection_id fthokunivhus
language English
description A hierarchy of approximations of the force balance for the flow of grounded ice exists, ranging from the most sophisticated full Stokes (FS) formulation to the most simplified shallow ice approximation (SIA). Both are implemented in the ice flow model Elmer/Ice, and we compare them by applying the model to the East Antarctic Shirase drainage basin. First, we apply the control inverse method to infer the distribution of basal friction with FS. We then compare FS and SIA by simulating the flow of the drainage basin under present-day conditions and for three scenarios 100 years into the future defined by the SeaRISE (Sea-level Response to Ice Sheet Evolution) project. FS reproduces the observed flow pattern of the drainage basin well, in particular the zone of fast flow near the grounding line, while SIA generally overpredicts the surface velocities. As for the transient scenarios, the ice volume change (relative to the constantclimate control run) of the surface climate experiment is nearly the same for FS and SIA, while for the basal sliding experiment (halved basal friction), the ice volume change is 30% larger for SIA than for FS. This confirms findings of earlier studies that, in order to model ice sheet areas containing ice streams and outlet glaciers with high resolution and precision, careful consideration must be given to the choice of a suitable force balance.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Seddik, Hakime
Greve, Ralf
Zwinger, Thomas
Sugiyama, Shin
spellingShingle Seddik, Hakime
Greve, Ralf
Zwinger, Thomas
Sugiyama, Shin
Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
author_facet Seddik, Hakime
Greve, Ralf
Zwinger, Thomas
Sugiyama, Shin
author_sort Seddik, Hakime
title Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
title_short Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
title_full Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
title_fullStr Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Regional modeling of the Shirase drainage basin, East Antarctica : full Stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
title_sort regional modeling of the shirase drainage basin, east antarctica : full stokes vs. shallow ice dynamics
publisher Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)
url http://hdl.handle.net/2115/67131
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017
geographic Antarctic
East Antarctica
geographic_facet Antarctic
East Antarctica
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
The Cryosphere
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
The Cryosphere
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2115/67131
The Cryosphere, 11(5): 2213-2229
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2213-2017
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 11
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2213
op_container_end_page 2229
_version_ 1766255446591537152