ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について

This study aims not only to clarify that the Tungusic languagesthe display different patterns of conditional constructions but also to raise a possibility that such distinctions of conditionals among Tungusic are based on geographical distribution of Tungusic and/or loss of DS conditional converb *-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 白, 尚燁
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Japanese
Published: 北海道大学大学院文学研究科
Subjects:
800
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/58338
id fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/58338
record_format openpolar
spelling fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/58338 2023-05-15T16:09:10+02:00 ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について Differences of Conditionals in the Tungusic Languages 白, 尚燁 http://hdl.handle.net/2115/58338 jpn jpn 北海道大学大学院文学研究科 http://hdl.handle.net/2115/58338 北方言語研究, 5: 129-152 800 bulletin (article) fthokunivhus 2022-11-18T01:03:26Z This study aims not only to clarify that the Tungusic languagesthe display different patterns of conditional constructions but also to raise a possibility that such distinctions of conditionals among Tungusic are based on geographical distribution of Tungusic and/or loss of DS conditional converb *-rAk-. This paper appliapplies two typological parameters of conditionalses to each Tungusic language as follows: switch-reference(same-subject, different-subject, and variable subject) and semantic types (real and unreal conditionals). In conclusion, conditionals in North Tungusic(Evenki, Even, and Negidal), both real and unreal, are formed with corresponding forms of two conditional converbal suffixes *-mi (SS) and *-rAk-(DS), which present a strict distinction of switch-reference. On the other hand, switch-reference does not function at all in the conditionals of South Tungusic (Solon, Hezhen, and Manchu), spoken in China, which are formed with conditional converbal suffixes (<*-rAk-). In addition, converb in -mi in this Chinese Tungusic does not serve as a conditional marker. East Tungusic(Nanay, Olcha, Uilta, Orochi, and Udihe) are divided into two groups on the basis of retention of DS conditional converbal suffix *-rAk-: 1) Nanay, Olcha, and Udihe, which lost the corresponding form of *-rAk-, have both switch-reference and non switch-reference oriented conditional forms in real conditional, whereas unreal conditionals, formed with special conditional particles, are not influenced by switch-reference, 2) Orochi and Uilta, shich retain the corresponding suffix of *-rAk-, form conditionals in accordance with switch-reference. Therefore, the differences of conditionals among Tungusic are presumed to result from areal distribution of Tungusic and/or loss of DS conditional converbal suffix *-rAk-. Article in Journal/Newspaper Evenki Tungusic languages Uilta Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) Evenki ENVELOPE(132.817,132.817,59.683,59.683)
institution Open Polar
collection Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP)
op_collection_id fthokunivhus
language Japanese
topic 800
spellingShingle 800
白, 尚燁
ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
topic_facet 800
description This study aims not only to clarify that the Tungusic languagesthe display different patterns of conditional constructions but also to raise a possibility that such distinctions of conditionals among Tungusic are based on geographical distribution of Tungusic and/or loss of DS conditional converb *-rAk-. This paper appliapplies two typological parameters of conditionalses to each Tungusic language as follows: switch-reference(same-subject, different-subject, and variable subject) and semantic types (real and unreal conditionals). In conclusion, conditionals in North Tungusic(Evenki, Even, and Negidal), both real and unreal, are formed with corresponding forms of two conditional converbal suffixes *-mi (SS) and *-rAk-(DS), which present a strict distinction of switch-reference. On the other hand, switch-reference does not function at all in the conditionals of South Tungusic (Solon, Hezhen, and Manchu), spoken in China, which are formed with conditional converbal suffixes (<*-rAk-). In addition, converb in -mi in this Chinese Tungusic does not serve as a conditional marker. East Tungusic(Nanay, Olcha, Uilta, Orochi, and Udihe) are divided into two groups on the basis of retention of DS conditional converbal suffix *-rAk-: 1) Nanay, Olcha, and Udihe, which lost the corresponding form of *-rAk-, have both switch-reference and non switch-reference oriented conditional forms in real conditional, whereas unreal conditionals, formed with special conditional particles, are not influenced by switch-reference, 2) Orochi and Uilta, shich retain the corresponding suffix of *-rAk-, form conditionals in accordance with switch-reference. Therefore, the differences of conditionals among Tungusic are presumed to result from areal distribution of Tungusic and/or loss of DS conditional converbal suffix *-rAk-.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author 白, 尚燁
author_facet 白, 尚燁
author_sort 白, 尚燁
title ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
title_short ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
title_full ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
title_fullStr ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
title_full_unstemmed ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
title_sort ツングース諸語における条件文の相違について
publisher 北海道大学大学院文学研究科
url http://hdl.handle.net/2115/58338
long_lat ENVELOPE(132.817,132.817,59.683,59.683)
geographic Evenki
geographic_facet Evenki
genre Evenki
Tungusic languages
Uilta
genre_facet Evenki
Tungusic languages
Uilta
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2115/58338
北方言語研究, 5: 129-152
_version_ 1766405107789856768