Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River

The migratory behavior and swimming patterns of anadromous upstream migratory fish have been poorly described in the Shibetsu River in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. In this 2004 study, we used electromyogram (EMG) transmitters and depth/ temperature (DT) loggers to compare the upstream migratory behavior...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrobiologia
Main Authors: Makiguchi, Y., Nii, H., Nakao, K., Ueda, H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/22080
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8
id fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/22080
record_format openpolar
spelling fthokunivhus:oai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/22080 2023-05-15T17:59:33+02:00 Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River Makiguchi, Y. Nii, H. Nakao, K. Ueda, H. http://hdl.handle.net/2115/22080 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8 eng eng Springer http://hdl.handle.net/2115/22080 Hydrobiologia, 582(1): 43-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8 The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com Migratory behavior Electromyogram (EMG) DT logger Meandering reconstruction 487.61 article (author version) fthokunivhus https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8 2022-11-18T01:01:25Z The migratory behavior and swimming patterns of anadromous upstream migratory fish have been poorly described in the Shibetsu River in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. In this 2004 study, we used electromyogram (EMG) transmitters and depth/ temperature (DT) loggers to compare the upstream migratory behavior of adult male chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) and pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) in the canalized and reconstructed segments of the Shibetsu River, where a part of canalized section was preliminary reconstructed meander to restore a more natural section. The EMG transmitter and DT logger were externally attached to the left side of the body, below the front edge of the dorsal fin. Fish of both species often migrated along the riverbanks and near the bottom of the water column, sometimes engaged in holding behavior, which was defined as cessation of swimming during their upstream migration for 5 minutes. Modal swimming depth calculated by DT loggers for chum salmon (0.2–0.4 m) was shallower than pink salmon (0.6–0.8 m). Further, modal swimming speeds measured by calibrated EMG for chum salmon (0.2–0.4 BL s−1) were slower than pink salmon (1.2–1.4 BL s−1). Pink salmon swam faster as well as in relatively deeper than chum salmon, suggesting that they expend more energy than chum salmon in the reconstructed segment. Based on these results, it seemed likely that the upstream migration behavior of chum and pink salmon was different with species-specific strategies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Pink salmon Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP) Keta ENVELOPE(-19.455,-19.455,65.656,65.656) Hydrobiologia 582 1 43 54
institution Open Polar
collection Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP)
op_collection_id fthokunivhus
language English
topic Migratory behavior
Electromyogram (EMG)
DT logger
Meandering reconstruction
487.61
spellingShingle Migratory behavior
Electromyogram (EMG)
DT logger
Meandering reconstruction
487.61
Makiguchi, Y.
Nii, H.
Nakao, K.
Ueda, H.
Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River
topic_facet Migratory behavior
Electromyogram (EMG)
DT logger
Meandering reconstruction
487.61
description The migratory behavior and swimming patterns of anadromous upstream migratory fish have been poorly described in the Shibetsu River in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. In this 2004 study, we used electromyogram (EMG) transmitters and depth/ temperature (DT) loggers to compare the upstream migratory behavior of adult male chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) and pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) in the canalized and reconstructed segments of the Shibetsu River, where a part of canalized section was preliminary reconstructed meander to restore a more natural section. The EMG transmitter and DT logger were externally attached to the left side of the body, below the front edge of the dorsal fin. Fish of both species often migrated along the riverbanks and near the bottom of the water column, sometimes engaged in holding behavior, which was defined as cessation of swimming during their upstream migration for 5 minutes. Modal swimming depth calculated by DT loggers for chum salmon (0.2–0.4 m) was shallower than pink salmon (0.6–0.8 m). Further, modal swimming speeds measured by calibrated EMG for chum salmon (0.2–0.4 BL s−1) were slower than pink salmon (1.2–1.4 BL s−1). Pink salmon swam faster as well as in relatively deeper than chum salmon, suggesting that they expend more energy than chum salmon in the reconstructed segment. Based on these results, it seemed likely that the upstream migration behavior of chum and pink salmon was different with species-specific strategies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Makiguchi, Y.
Nii, H.
Nakao, K.
Ueda, H.
author_facet Makiguchi, Y.
Nii, H.
Nakao, K.
Ueda, H.
author_sort Makiguchi, Y.
title Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River
title_short Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River
title_full Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River
title_fullStr Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River
title_full_unstemmed Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River
title_sort upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the shibetsu river
publisher Springer
url http://hdl.handle.net/2115/22080
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8
long_lat ENVELOPE(-19.455,-19.455,65.656,65.656)
geographic Keta
geographic_facet Keta
genre Pink salmon
genre_facet Pink salmon
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2115/22080
Hydrobiologia, 582(1): 43-54
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8
op_rights The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 582
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
op_container_end_page 54
_version_ 1766168398727741440