Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation

Objective. Caesarean section (CS) rates vary significantly worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended a maximum CS rate of 15%. Norwegian hospitals are paid per CS (activity-based funding), employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. We aimed to document how financial inc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Main Authors: Jan Norum, Tove Elisabeth Svee
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258
id fthindawi:oai:hindawi.com:10.1155/2018/6764258
record_format openpolar
spelling fthindawi:oai:hindawi.com:10.1155/2018/6764258 2023-05-15T17:43:22+02:00 Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation Jan Norum Tove Elisabeth Svee 2018 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258 en eng Obstetrics and Gynecology International https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258 Copyright © 2018 Jan Norum and Tove Elisabeth Svee. Research Article 2018 fthindawi https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258 2019-05-26T10:28:10Z Objective. Caesarean section (CS) rates vary significantly worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended a maximum CS rate of 15%. Norwegian hospitals are paid per CS (activity-based funding), employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. We aimed to document how financial incentives can be affected by reduced CS rates, according to the WHO’s recommendation. Methods. We employed a model-based analysis and included the 2016 data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). The vaginal birth rate and CS rates of each hospital trust in Northern Norway were analyzed. Results. There were 4,860 deliveries and a 17.5% CS rate (range 13.9–20.3%). The total funding of the deliveries was €16,351,335 (CS: €6,389,323; vaginal births: €9,962,012). The CS rate varied significantly and was lower in the southern region (P<0.002). Consequently, the introduction of a cutoff at a 15% CS rate would gain the two southern hospital trusts by a budget increase of 0.2%. The two northern ones would experience 6.4% less resources. A total of €644,655 could be allocated to further quality and safety initiatives in obstetrics. Conclusion. The economic consequences of the model-based financial incentive were low, but probably sufficient to get the necessary attention and influence on the CS rate. Recommendations. A financial incentive for the reduction of CS rates should be tested as a supplement to other instruments. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway Hindawi Publishing Corporation Norway Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2018 1 6
institution Open Polar
collection Hindawi Publishing Corporation
op_collection_id fthindawi
language English
description Objective. Caesarean section (CS) rates vary significantly worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended a maximum CS rate of 15%. Norwegian hospitals are paid per CS (activity-based funding), employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. We aimed to document how financial incentives can be affected by reduced CS rates, according to the WHO’s recommendation. Methods. We employed a model-based analysis and included the 2016 data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). The vaginal birth rate and CS rates of each hospital trust in Northern Norway were analyzed. Results. There were 4,860 deliveries and a 17.5% CS rate (range 13.9–20.3%). The total funding of the deliveries was €16,351,335 (CS: €6,389,323; vaginal births: €9,962,012). The CS rate varied significantly and was lower in the southern region (P<0.002). Consequently, the introduction of a cutoff at a 15% CS rate would gain the two southern hospital trusts by a budget increase of 0.2%. The two northern ones would experience 6.4% less resources. A total of €644,655 could be allocated to further quality and safety initiatives in obstetrics. Conclusion. The economic consequences of the model-based financial incentive were low, but probably sufficient to get the necessary attention and influence on the CS rate. Recommendations. A financial incentive for the reduction of CS rates should be tested as a supplement to other instruments.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jan Norum
Tove Elisabeth Svee
spellingShingle Jan Norum
Tove Elisabeth Svee
Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation
author_facet Jan Norum
Tove Elisabeth Svee
author_sort Jan Norum
title Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation
title_short Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation
title_full Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation
title_fullStr Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation
title_full_unstemmed Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization’s Recommendation
title_sort caesarean section rates and activity-based funding in northern norway: a model-based study using the world health organization’s recommendation
publisher Obstetrics and Gynecology International
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258
op_rights Copyright © 2018 Jan Norum and Tove Elisabeth Svee.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6764258
container_title Obstetrics and Gynecology International
container_volume 2018
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 6
_version_ 1766145430270246912