Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current

Ocean iron fertilization experiments enable the quantitative study of processes shaping the structure and functioning of pelagic ecosystems following perturbation under in situ conditions. EIFEX was conducted within a stationary eddy adjacent to the Antarctic Polar Front over 38 days in February/Mar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Plankton Research
Main Authors: Assmy, Philipp, Cisewski, Boris, Henjes, Joachim, Klaas, Christine, Montresor, Marina, Smetacek, Victor
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/fbu068v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:plankt:fbu068v1
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:plankt:fbu068v1 2023-05-15T13:57:29+02:00 Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current Assmy, Philipp Cisewski, Boris Henjes, Joachim Klaas, Christine Montresor, Marina Smetacek, Victor 2014-08-06 00:12:46.0 text/html http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/fbu068v1 https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068 en eng Oxford University Press http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/fbu068v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068 Copyright (C) 2014, Oxford University Press Article TEXT 2014 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068 2016-11-16T18:35:58Z Ocean iron fertilization experiments enable the quantitative study of processes shaping the structure and functioning of pelagic ecosystems following perturbation under in situ conditions. EIFEX was conducted within a stationary eddy adjacent to the Antarctic Polar Front over 38 days in February/March 2004 and induced a massive diatom bloom. Here, we present the responses in abundance and biomass of all identifiable protozooplankton taxa (heterotrophic protists ranging from 2 to 500 µm) during the bloom. Acantharia, dinoflagellates and ciliates together contributed >90% of protozooplankton biomass in the upper 100 m throughout the experiment with heterotrophic nanoflagellates, nassellaria, spumellaria, phaeodaria, foraminifera and the taxopodidean Sticholonche zanclea providing the remainder. Total protozooplankton biomass increased slightly from 1.0 to 1.3 g C m−2 within the fertilized patch and remained at 0.7+0.04 g C m−2 outside it. However, distinct trends in population build-up or decline were observed within the dominant taxa in each group. In general, smaller less-defended groups such as aloricate ciliates and athecate dinoflagellates declined, whereas the biomass of large, spiny and armoured groups, in particular acantharia, large tintinnids and thecate dinoflagellates increased inside the patch. We attribute the higher accumulation rates of defended taxa to selective, heavy grazing pressure by the large stocks of copepods. Of the defended taxa, acantharia had the lowest mortality rates and the highest biomass. Large stocks of tintinnid loricae in the deep water column identify this group as a relevant contributor to deep organic carbon export. Highest accumulation rates (0.11 day−1) were recorded in S. zanclea . Text Antarc* Antarctic Copepods HighWire Press (Stanford University) Antarctic The Antarctic Journal of Plankton Research 36 5 1175 1189
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
Assmy, Philipp
Cisewski, Boris
Henjes, Joachim
Klaas, Christine
Montresor, Marina
Smetacek, Victor
Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current
topic_facet Article
description Ocean iron fertilization experiments enable the quantitative study of processes shaping the structure and functioning of pelagic ecosystems following perturbation under in situ conditions. EIFEX was conducted within a stationary eddy adjacent to the Antarctic Polar Front over 38 days in February/March 2004 and induced a massive diatom bloom. Here, we present the responses in abundance and biomass of all identifiable protozooplankton taxa (heterotrophic protists ranging from 2 to 500 µm) during the bloom. Acantharia, dinoflagellates and ciliates together contributed >90% of protozooplankton biomass in the upper 100 m throughout the experiment with heterotrophic nanoflagellates, nassellaria, spumellaria, phaeodaria, foraminifera and the taxopodidean Sticholonche zanclea providing the remainder. Total protozooplankton biomass increased slightly from 1.0 to 1.3 g C m−2 within the fertilized patch and remained at 0.7+0.04 g C m−2 outside it. However, distinct trends in population build-up or decline were observed within the dominant taxa in each group. In general, smaller less-defended groups such as aloricate ciliates and athecate dinoflagellates declined, whereas the biomass of large, spiny and armoured groups, in particular acantharia, large tintinnids and thecate dinoflagellates increased inside the patch. We attribute the higher accumulation rates of defended taxa to selective, heavy grazing pressure by the large stocks of copepods. Of the defended taxa, acantharia had the lowest mortality rates and the highest biomass. Large stocks of tintinnid loricae in the deep water column identify this group as a relevant contributor to deep organic carbon export. Highest accumulation rates (0.11 day−1) were recorded in S. zanclea .
format Text
author Assmy, Philipp
Cisewski, Boris
Henjes, Joachim
Klaas, Christine
Montresor, Marina
Smetacek, Victor
author_facet Assmy, Philipp
Cisewski, Boris
Henjes, Joachim
Klaas, Christine
Montresor, Marina
Smetacek, Victor
author_sort Assmy, Philipp
title Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current
title_short Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current
title_full Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current
title_fullStr Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current
title_full_unstemmed Response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) in the Antarctic circumpolar current
title_sort response of the protozooplankton assemblage during the european iron fertilization experiment (eifex) in the antarctic circumpolar current
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2014
url http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/fbu068v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Copepods
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Copepods
op_relation http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/fbu068v1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068
op_rights Copyright (C) 2014, Oxford University Press
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu068
container_title Journal of Plankton Research
container_volume 36
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1175
op_container_end_page 1189
_version_ 1766265151617499136