Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills

Identification of predators from saliva traces on game species and/or livestock kills is gaining increasing importance in wildlife management, particularly in areas where direct wildlife–human conflicts regularly occur. When the noninvasive sampling of hairs and scats is difficult, as with rare and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Mammalogy
Main Authors: Harms, Verena, Nowak, Carsten, Carl, Susanne, Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/96/1/138
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jmammal:96/1/138
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jmammal:96/1/138 2023-05-15T15:50:25+02:00 Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills Harms, Verena Nowak, Carsten Carl, Susanne Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta 2015-02-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/96/1/138 https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014 en eng Oxford University Press http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/96/1/138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014 Copyright (C) 2015, Oxford University Press Feature Article TEXT 2015 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014 2016-11-16T18:39:41Z Identification of predators from saliva traces on game species and/or livestock kills is gaining increasing importance in wildlife management, particularly in areas where direct wildlife–human conflicts regularly occur. When the noninvasive sampling of hairs and scats is difficult, as with rare and elusive predators, saliva samples constitute a potentially useful source of DNA. To test the feasibility of this approach in obtaining an accurate genotype of the predator, we applied an experimental approach. Captive wolves ( Canis lupus ) and lynxes ( Lynx lynx ) were allowed to feed on freshly killed roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ) pieces for 1min. After removal, pieces were sampled for saliva traces after 1, 24, and 48h. Microsatellite analysis revealed that error rates and amplification failure increased sharply over time. While samples collected after 1 and 24 h yielded > 83% complete genotypes, values dropped to < 50% for samples collected after 48h, of which 7% were incorrect even when consensus genotypes from 9 polymerase chain reactions were obtained. Our results stress the importance of rapid sampling after carcass detection, as well as implementing a multiple-tubes approach when using microsatellite markers for genetic predator identification based on saliva traces. Text Canis lupus Lynx HighWire Press (Stanford University) Journal of Mammalogy 96 1 138 143
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Feature Article
spellingShingle Feature Article
Harms, Verena
Nowak, Carsten
Carl, Susanne
Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta
Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
topic_facet Feature Article
description Identification of predators from saliva traces on game species and/or livestock kills is gaining increasing importance in wildlife management, particularly in areas where direct wildlife–human conflicts regularly occur. When the noninvasive sampling of hairs and scats is difficult, as with rare and elusive predators, saliva samples constitute a potentially useful source of DNA. To test the feasibility of this approach in obtaining an accurate genotype of the predator, we applied an experimental approach. Captive wolves ( Canis lupus ) and lynxes ( Lynx lynx ) were allowed to feed on freshly killed roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ) pieces for 1min. After removal, pieces were sampled for saliva traces after 1, 24, and 48h. Microsatellite analysis revealed that error rates and amplification failure increased sharply over time. While samples collected after 1 and 24 h yielded > 83% complete genotypes, values dropped to < 50% for samples collected after 48h, of which 7% were incorrect even when consensus genotypes from 9 polymerase chain reactions were obtained. Our results stress the importance of rapid sampling after carcass detection, as well as implementing a multiple-tubes approach when using microsatellite markers for genetic predator identification based on saliva traces.
format Text
author Harms, Verena
Nowak, Carsten
Carl, Susanne
Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta
author_facet Harms, Verena
Nowak, Carsten
Carl, Susanne
Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta
author_sort Harms, Verena
title Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
title_short Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
title_full Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
title_fullStr Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
title_full_unstemmed Experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
title_sort experimental evaluation of genetic predator identification from saliva traces on wildlife kills
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2015
url http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/96/1/138
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014
genre Canis lupus
Lynx
genre_facet Canis lupus
Lynx
op_relation http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/96/1/138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014
op_rights Copyright (C) 2015, Oxford University Press
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu014
container_title Journal of Mammalogy
container_volume 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 138
op_container_end_page 143
_version_ 1766385365196734464