Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data

The distinct ecological requirements of Microtus xanthognathus (yellow-cheeked vole or taiga vole) and M. pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) warrant accurate discrimination of their remains in studies of paleoecology and past biogeographical shifts. An occlusal length of the lower 1st molars (ml) that is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Mammalogy
Main Author: Wallace, Steven C.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/87/6/1261
https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jmammal:87/6/1261
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jmammal:87/6/1261 2023-05-15T18:30:48+02:00 Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data Wallace, Steven C. 2006-12-29 00:00:00.0 text/html http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/87/6/1261 https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 en eng Oxford University Press http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/87/6/1261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 Copyright (C) 2006, Oxford University Press Feature Articles TEXT 2006 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 2016-11-16T18:33:48Z The distinct ecological requirements of Microtus xanthognathus (yellow-cheeked vole or taiga vole) and M. pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) warrant accurate discrimination of their remains in studies of paleoecology and past biogeographical shifts. An occlusal length of the lower 1st molars (ml) that is >3.2 mm for M. xanthognathus is the method most frequently used to separate these 2 taxa in archaeological and paleontological samples. However, these measurements alone are unreliable because some specimens of M. pennsylvanicus overlap smaller individuals of M. xanthognathus in size. Therefore, I created and tested a morphometric technique that discriminates Recent lower 1st molars (mis) of M. pennsylvanicus from those of M. xanthognathus , and is applicable to other taxa (both modern and fossil). Despite overlapping occlusal length, my discriminant function based on landmark data correctly classified 100% ( n = 53) of Recent mis from the 2 taxa and 97.7% (43 of 44) of (assumed) mis of M. pennsylvanicus from an archaeological site from about AD 1200 in central Nebraska. This landmark scheme is applicable to fossil and modern Microtus worldwide. Text taiga HighWire Press (Stanford University) Journal of Mammalogy 87 6 1261 1269
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Feature Articles
spellingShingle Feature Articles
Wallace, Steven C.
Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
topic_facet Feature Articles
description The distinct ecological requirements of Microtus xanthognathus (yellow-cheeked vole or taiga vole) and M. pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) warrant accurate discrimination of their remains in studies of paleoecology and past biogeographical shifts. An occlusal length of the lower 1st molars (ml) that is >3.2 mm for M. xanthognathus is the method most frequently used to separate these 2 taxa in archaeological and paleontological samples. However, these measurements alone are unreliable because some specimens of M. pennsylvanicus overlap smaller individuals of M. xanthognathus in size. Therefore, I created and tested a morphometric technique that discriminates Recent lower 1st molars (mis) of M. pennsylvanicus from those of M. xanthognathus , and is applicable to other taxa (both modern and fossil). Despite overlapping occlusal length, my discriminant function based on landmark data correctly classified 100% ( n = 53) of Recent mis from the 2 taxa and 97.7% (43 of 44) of (assumed) mis of M. pennsylvanicus from an archaeological site from about AD 1200 in central Nebraska. This landmark scheme is applicable to fossil and modern Microtus worldwide.
format Text
author Wallace, Steven C.
author_facet Wallace, Steven C.
author_sort Wallace, Steven C.
title Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_short Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_full Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_fullStr Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating Microtus xanthognathus and Microtus pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_sort differentiating microtus xanthognathus and microtus pennsylvanicus lower first molars using discriminant analysis of landmark data
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2006
url http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/87/6/1261
https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
genre taiga
genre_facet taiga
op_relation http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/87/6/1261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
op_rights Copyright (C) 2006, Oxford University Press
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
container_title Journal of Mammalogy
container_volume 87
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1261
op_container_end_page 1269
_version_ 1766214383876177920