A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads

Mytilid bivalves employ a set of threads (the byssus) to attach themselves to both hard and soft substrates. In this study, we measured the mechanical properties of byssal threads from two semi-infaunal mytilids ( Geukensia demissa Dillwyn and Modiolus modiolus Linnaeus) and two epifaunal mytilids (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Experimental Biology
Main Authors: Pearce, Trevor, LaBarbera, Michael
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Company of Biologists 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/short/212/10/1442
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jexbio:212/10/1442
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jexbio:212/10/1442 2023-05-15T17:13:02+02:00 A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads Pearce, Trevor LaBarbera, Michael 2009-05-15 00:00:00.0 text/html http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/short/212/10/1442 https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544 en eng Company of Biologists http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/short/212/10/1442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544 Copyright (C) 2009, Company of Biologists Research Article TEXT 2009 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544 2013-04-02T07:37:34Z Mytilid bivalves employ a set of threads (the byssus) to attach themselves to both hard and soft substrates. In this study, we measured the mechanical properties of byssal threads from two semi-infaunal mytilids ( Geukensia demissa Dillwyn and Modiolus modiolus Linnaeus) and two epifaunal mytilids ( Mytilus californianus Conrad and Mytilus edulis Linnaeus). We compared material properties with and without the assumption that changes of length and area during tensile testing are insignificant, demonstrating that previous researchers have overestimated extensibility values by 30% and may also have underestimated strength values. We detected significant differences in thread properties among tested mytilid species, contrary to previous findings. Threads from semi-infaunal species were significantly thinner than those from epifaunal species, perhaps to allow the production of a greater number of threads, which form a dense network within the substrate. Geukensia demissa threads were weaker than those of the other species, and had a significantly lower stiffness at failure. Modiolus modiolus threads were significantly stiffer than M. edulis threads but also significantly less extensible, suggesting a trade-off between stiffness and extensibility. The only thread property that did not show significant differences across species was toughness – even when byssal threads differ in strength or stiffness, they seem to absorb similar amounts of energy per unit volume prior to failure. This study reveals notable differences between the byssal thread properties of different mytilid bivalves and provides a reliable and thorough methodology for future comparative studies. Text Modiolus modiolus HighWire Press (Stanford University) Journal of Experimental Biology 212 10 1442 1448
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
Pearce, Trevor
LaBarbera, Michael
A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads
topic_facet Research Article
description Mytilid bivalves employ a set of threads (the byssus) to attach themselves to both hard and soft substrates. In this study, we measured the mechanical properties of byssal threads from two semi-infaunal mytilids ( Geukensia demissa Dillwyn and Modiolus modiolus Linnaeus) and two epifaunal mytilids ( Mytilus californianus Conrad and Mytilus edulis Linnaeus). We compared material properties with and without the assumption that changes of length and area during tensile testing are insignificant, demonstrating that previous researchers have overestimated extensibility values by 30% and may also have underestimated strength values. We detected significant differences in thread properties among tested mytilid species, contrary to previous findings. Threads from semi-infaunal species were significantly thinner than those from epifaunal species, perhaps to allow the production of a greater number of threads, which form a dense network within the substrate. Geukensia demissa threads were weaker than those of the other species, and had a significantly lower stiffness at failure. Modiolus modiolus threads were significantly stiffer than M. edulis threads but also significantly less extensible, suggesting a trade-off between stiffness and extensibility. The only thread property that did not show significant differences across species was toughness – even when byssal threads differ in strength or stiffness, they seem to absorb similar amounts of energy per unit volume prior to failure. This study reveals notable differences between the byssal thread properties of different mytilid bivalves and provides a reliable and thorough methodology for future comparative studies.
format Text
author Pearce, Trevor
LaBarbera, Michael
author_facet Pearce, Trevor
LaBarbera, Michael
author_sort Pearce, Trevor
title A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads
title_short A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads
title_full A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads
title_fullStr A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the mechanical properties of Mytilid byssal threads
title_sort comparative study of the mechanical properties of mytilid byssal threads
publisher Company of Biologists
publishDate 2009
url http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/short/212/10/1442
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544
genre Modiolus modiolus
genre_facet Modiolus modiolus
op_relation http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/short/212/10/1442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544
op_rights Copyright (C) 2009, Company of Biologists
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025544
container_title Journal of Experimental Biology
container_volume 212
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1442
op_container_end_page 1448
_version_ 1766069933291077632