Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts

Background There are various maternal prenatal biopsychosocial (BPS) predictors of birth weight, making it difficult to quantify their cumulative relationship. Methods We studied two birth cohorts: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 (NFBC1986) born in 1985–1986 and the Generation R Study (from the N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Main Authors: Parmar, Priyanka, Lowry, Estelle, Vehmeijer, Florianne, El Marroun, Hanan, Lewin, Alex, Tolvanen, Mimmi, Tzala, Evangelia, Ala-Mursula, Leena, Herzig, Karl-Heinz, Miettunen, Jouko, Prokopenko, Inga, Rautio, Nina, Jaddoe, Vincent WV, Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta, Felix, Janine, Sebert, Sylvain
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/74/11/933
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jech:74/11/933
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jech:74/11/933 2023-05-15T17:42:44+02:00 Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts Parmar, Priyanka Lowry, Estelle Vehmeijer, Florianne El Marroun, Hanan Lewin, Alex Tolvanen, Mimmi Tzala, Evangelia Ala-Mursula, Leena Herzig, Karl-Heinz Miettunen, Jouko Prokopenko, Inga Rautio, Nina Jaddoe, Vincent WV Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta Felix, Janine Sebert, Sylvain 2020-11-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/74/11/933 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154 en eng BMJ Publishing Group Ltd http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/74/11/933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154 Copyright (C) 2020, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd Original research TEXT 2020 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154 2020-10-20T11:13:00Z Background There are various maternal prenatal biopsychosocial (BPS) predictors of birth weight, making it difficult to quantify their cumulative relationship. Methods We studied two birth cohorts: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 (NFBC1986) born in 1985–1986 and the Generation R Study (from the Netherlands) born in 2002–2006. In NFBC1986, we selected variables depicting BPS exposure in association with birth weight and performed factor analysis to derive latent constructs representing the relationship between these variables. In Generation R, the same factors were generated weighted by loadings of NFBC1986. Factor scores from each factor were then allocated into tertiles and added together to calculate a cumulative BPS score. In all cases, we used regression analyses to explore the relationship with birth weight corrected for sex and gestational age and additionally adjusted for other factors. Results Factor analysis supported a four-factor structure, labelled closely to represent their characteristics as ‘Factor1-BMI’ (body mass index), ‘Factor2-DBP’ (diastolic blood pressure), ‘Factor3-Socioeconomic-Obstetric-Profile’ and ‘Factor4-Parental-Lifestyle ’ . In both cohorts, ‘Factor1-BMI’ was positively associated with birth weight, whereas other factors showed negative association. ‘Factor3-Socioeconomic-Obstetric-Profile’ and ‘Factor4-Parental-Lifestyle’ had the greatest effect size, explaining 30% of the variation in birth weight. Associations of the factors with birth weight were largely driven by ‘Factor1-BMI’. Graded decrease in birth weight was observed with increasing cumulative BPS score, jointly evaluating four factors in both cohorts. Conclusion Our study is a proof of concept for maternal prenatal BPS hypothesis, highlighting the components snowball effect on birth weight in two different European birth cohorts. Text Northern Finland HighWire Press (Stanford University) Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health jech-2019-213154
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Original research
spellingShingle Original research
Parmar, Priyanka
Lowry, Estelle
Vehmeijer, Florianne
El Marroun, Hanan
Lewin, Alex
Tolvanen, Mimmi
Tzala, Evangelia
Ala-Mursula, Leena
Herzig, Karl-Heinz
Miettunen, Jouko
Prokopenko, Inga
Rautio, Nina
Jaddoe, Vincent WV
Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Felix, Janine
Sebert, Sylvain
Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts
topic_facet Original research
description Background There are various maternal prenatal biopsychosocial (BPS) predictors of birth weight, making it difficult to quantify their cumulative relationship. Methods We studied two birth cohorts: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 (NFBC1986) born in 1985–1986 and the Generation R Study (from the Netherlands) born in 2002–2006. In NFBC1986, we selected variables depicting BPS exposure in association with birth weight and performed factor analysis to derive latent constructs representing the relationship between these variables. In Generation R, the same factors were generated weighted by loadings of NFBC1986. Factor scores from each factor were then allocated into tertiles and added together to calculate a cumulative BPS score. In all cases, we used regression analyses to explore the relationship with birth weight corrected for sex and gestational age and additionally adjusted for other factors. Results Factor analysis supported a four-factor structure, labelled closely to represent their characteristics as ‘Factor1-BMI’ (body mass index), ‘Factor2-DBP’ (diastolic blood pressure), ‘Factor3-Socioeconomic-Obstetric-Profile’ and ‘Factor4-Parental-Lifestyle ’ . In both cohorts, ‘Factor1-BMI’ was positively associated with birth weight, whereas other factors showed negative association. ‘Factor3-Socioeconomic-Obstetric-Profile’ and ‘Factor4-Parental-Lifestyle’ had the greatest effect size, explaining 30% of the variation in birth weight. Associations of the factors with birth weight were largely driven by ‘Factor1-BMI’. Graded decrease in birth weight was observed with increasing cumulative BPS score, jointly evaluating four factors in both cohorts. Conclusion Our study is a proof of concept for maternal prenatal BPS hypothesis, highlighting the components snowball effect on birth weight in two different European birth cohorts.
format Text
author Parmar, Priyanka
Lowry, Estelle
Vehmeijer, Florianne
El Marroun, Hanan
Lewin, Alex
Tolvanen, Mimmi
Tzala, Evangelia
Ala-Mursula, Leena
Herzig, Karl-Heinz
Miettunen, Jouko
Prokopenko, Inga
Rautio, Nina
Jaddoe, Vincent WV
Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Felix, Janine
Sebert, Sylvain
author_facet Parmar, Priyanka
Lowry, Estelle
Vehmeijer, Florianne
El Marroun, Hanan
Lewin, Alex
Tolvanen, Mimmi
Tzala, Evangelia
Ala-Mursula, Leena
Herzig, Karl-Heinz
Miettunen, Jouko
Prokopenko, Inga
Rautio, Nina
Jaddoe, Vincent WV
Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Felix, Janine
Sebert, Sylvain
author_sort Parmar, Priyanka
title Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts
title_short Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts
title_full Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts
title_fullStr Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a DynaHEALTH study on two birth cohorts
title_sort understanding the cumulative risk of maternal prenatal biopsychosocial factors on birth weight: a dynahealth study on two birth cohorts
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
publishDate 2020
url http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/74/11/933
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154
genre Northern Finland
genre_facet Northern Finland
op_relation http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/74/11/933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154
op_rights Copyright (C) 2020, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213154
container_title Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
container_start_page jech-2019-213154
_version_ 1766144646159794176