At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics
Indigenous peoples are often perceived as custodians of nature owing to their close relationship with their environment and their nature-based livelihoods. This paper investigates the kinds of environmental agencies that are constructed for, and by, indigenous peoples within the United Nations (UN)...
Published in: | International Political Sociology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ips.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/7/3/275 https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 |
_version_ | 1821796962017476608 |
---|---|
author | Lindroth, Marjo Sinevaara-Niskanen, Heidi |
author_facet | Lindroth, Marjo Sinevaara-Niskanen, Heidi |
author_sort | Lindroth, Marjo |
collection | HighWire Press (Stanford University) |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 275 |
container_title | International Political Sociology |
container_volume | 7 |
description | Indigenous peoples are often perceived as custodians of nature owing to their close relationship with their environment and their nature-based livelihoods. This paper investigates the kinds of environmental agencies that are constructed for, and by, indigenous peoples within the United Nations (UN) Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (PF) and the Arctic Council. The particular focus of this research is the issue of responsibility. The article brings together empirical materials from the two forums and engages with them using Foucault-inspired approaches. We offer a critical discussion of indigenous peoples' environmental agency in international politics, addressing the need to problematize representations of indigenous agency that to date have been largely unchallenged in both the practice and study of international politics. We identify three perspectives through which the environmental agency of indigenous peoples is validated and justified: having particular knowledge, being stakeholders, and having a close relationship with nature. Certain kinds of expectations are inscribed in each of these perspectives; responsibility becomes intertwined with agency. |
format | Text |
genre | Arctic Council Arctic |
genre_facet | Arctic Council Arctic |
geographic | Arctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic |
id | fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:ips:7/3/275 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | fthighwire |
op_container_end_page | 293 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 |
op_relation | http://ips.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/7/3/275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 |
op_rights | Copyright (C) 2013, International Studies Association |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:ips:7/3/275 2025-01-16T20:00:25+00:00 At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics Lindroth, Marjo Sinevaara-Niskanen, Heidi 2013-09-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://ips.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/7/3/275 https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 en eng Oxford University Press http://ips.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/7/3/275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 Copyright (C) 2013, International Studies Association Original Articles TEXT 2013 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 2016-11-16T17:34:47Z Indigenous peoples are often perceived as custodians of nature owing to their close relationship with their environment and their nature-based livelihoods. This paper investigates the kinds of environmental agencies that are constructed for, and by, indigenous peoples within the United Nations (UN) Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (PF) and the Arctic Council. The particular focus of this research is the issue of responsibility. The article brings together empirical materials from the two forums and engages with them using Foucault-inspired approaches. We offer a critical discussion of indigenous peoples' environmental agency in international politics, addressing the need to problematize representations of indigenous agency that to date have been largely unchallenged in both the practice and study of international politics. We identify three perspectives through which the environmental agency of indigenous peoples is validated and justified: having particular knowledge, being stakeholders, and having a close relationship with nature. Certain kinds of expectations are inscribed in each of these perspectives; responsibility becomes intertwined with agency. Text Arctic Council Arctic HighWire Press (Stanford University) Arctic International Political Sociology 7 3 275 293 |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lindroth, Marjo Sinevaara-Niskanen, Heidi At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics |
title | At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics |
title_full | At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics |
title_fullStr | At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics |
title_full_unstemmed | At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics |
title_short | At the Crossroads of Autonomy and Essentialism: Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Politics |
title_sort | at the crossroads of autonomy and essentialism: indigenous peoples in international environmental politics |
topic | Original Articles |
topic_facet | Original Articles |
url | http://ips.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/7/3/275 https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12023 |