ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE

General Practitioners feel increasing pressure from Public Health authorities to evaluate their work but generally accept outcome indices such as morbidity and mortality are too far away from GP practices to allow direct evaluative conclusions. A simple instrument is needed to assess the evolution i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Main Authors: Schillemans, Leo, De Muynck, Aimé, Van Der Stuyft, Patrick, Saenen, Rita, Baeten, Rita
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/161
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:intqhc:2/2/161
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:intqhc:2/2/161 2023-05-15T18:11:08+02:00 ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE Schillemans, Leo De Muynck, Aimé Van Der Stuyft, Patrick Saenen, Rita Baeten, Rita 1990-06-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/161 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161 en eng Oxford University Press http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161 Copyright (C) 1990, International Society for Quality in Health Care Articles TEXT 1990 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161 2013-05-28T01:55:19Z General Practitioners feel increasing pressure from Public Health authorities to evaluate their work but generally accept outcome indices such as morbidity and mortality are too far away from GP practices to allow direct evaluative conclusions. A simple instrument is needed to assess the evolution in the health status of the populations the GP serves. To design such an instrument we developed a short, inexpensive questionnaire, to be filled in by the GP, that covers as many fields of health care as possible and reflects as closely as possible the specific approach in family practice. To construct this instrument five Guttman scales were first developed that refer to the five frameworks of thought that a general practitioner uses, and submitted them to a process of validation. A composite index (SAMI) was mathematically derived from these five scales; it proved to be a valid instrument for measuring health status. To field test the SAMI index, a prospective cohort study was carried out in two subpopulations, Belgians and migrants, consulting seven GP practices. The evolution of four reasons for encounter (low back pain, pregnancy, diabetes and epigastralgia) were monitored by means of the five scales and the SAMI index. The evaluative conclusion that, despite special efforts of the GPs, their approach to migrants has to be reconsidered, is drawn. Above all the field test has shown that the five measurement scales and the global SAMI index are valid instruments, of easy use in general practice, that allow to assess the global health status of patient populations and give opportunities for evaluation of PHC services. Text sami HighWire Press (Stanford University) International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2 2 161 170
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Schillemans, Leo
De Muynck, Aimé
Van Der Stuyft, Patrick
Saenen, Rita
Baeten, Rita
ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE
topic_facet Articles
description General Practitioners feel increasing pressure from Public Health authorities to evaluate their work but generally accept outcome indices such as morbidity and mortality are too far away from GP practices to allow direct evaluative conclusions. A simple instrument is needed to assess the evolution in the health status of the populations the GP serves. To design such an instrument we developed a short, inexpensive questionnaire, to be filled in by the GP, that covers as many fields of health care as possible and reflects as closely as possible the specific approach in family practice. To construct this instrument five Guttman scales were first developed that refer to the five frameworks of thought that a general practitioner uses, and submitted them to a process of validation. A composite index (SAMI) was mathematically derived from these five scales; it proved to be a valid instrument for measuring health status. To field test the SAMI index, a prospective cohort study was carried out in two subpopulations, Belgians and migrants, consulting seven GP practices. The evolution of four reasons for encounter (low back pain, pregnancy, diabetes and epigastralgia) were monitored by means of the five scales and the SAMI index. The evaluative conclusion that, despite special efforts of the GPs, their approach to migrants has to be reconsidered, is drawn. Above all the field test has shown that the five measurement scales and the global SAMI index are valid instruments, of easy use in general practice, that allow to assess the global health status of patient populations and give opportunities for evaluation of PHC services.
format Text
author Schillemans, Leo
De Muynck, Aimé
Van Der Stuyft, Patrick
Saenen, Rita
Baeten, Rita
author_facet Schillemans, Leo
De Muynck, Aimé
Van Der Stuyft, Patrick
Saenen, Rita
Baeten, Rita
author_sort Schillemans, Leo
title ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE
title_short ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE
title_full ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE
title_fullStr ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE
title_full_unstemmed ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS' HEALTH STATUS IN FAMILY MEDICINE
title_sort assessment of patients' health status in family medicine
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 1990
url http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/161
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_relation http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161
op_rights Copyright (C) 1990, International Society for Quality in Health Care
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/2.2.161
container_title International Journal for Quality in Health Care
container_volume 2
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
op_container_end_page 170
_version_ 1766183844090740736