How vertical fish distribution may affect survey results

At a selected location in the Barents Sea, acoustic observations were made and bottom- and pelagic-trawl data were collected over a 10-day period. A large proportion of fish were found in the acoustic bottom dead zone. Only during a few hours in the daytime were high acoustic values obtained, mainly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Aglen, A., Engås, A., Huse, I., Michalsen, K., Stensholt, B. K.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/56/3/345
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0449
Description
Summary:At a selected location in the Barents Sea, acoustic observations were made and bottom- and pelagic-trawl data were collected over a 10-day period. A large proportion of fish were found in the acoustic bottom dead zone. Only during a few hours in the daytime were high acoustic values obtained, mainly consisting of large haddock ascending from the bottom. Small haddock and redfish dominated the acoustic recordings at night. The bottom-trawl catches showed greater variability and higher average catch rates during the day than at night, but the diel variations were relatively less pronounced than those of the acoustic recordings. The largest reductions in catch rates from day to night were observed in small haddock and redfish. This was consistent with the observation that these species were pelagic at night. The acoustic observations and the bottom-trawl catch rates were found to be correlated with diel cycles in observed light level and semi-diel cycles in current speed. The results are interpreted in terms of the variable availability and efficiency of the bottom trawl and of the variable availability of the echosounder.