Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock
TAC recommendations for North-East Arctic cod have traditionally been based on F max , but F med might be preferable to F max as a biological reference point. However, the current F med estimate of more than twice F max appears high, and there is reason to question the basis for the estimate. Furthe...
Published in: | ICES Journal of Marine Science |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
1992
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/155 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 |
id |
fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:icesjms:49/2/155 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:icesjms:49/2/155 2023-05-15T14:30:21+02:00 Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock Jakobsen, Tore 1992-05-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/155 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 en eng Oxford University Press http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 Copyright (C) 1992, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer Articles TEXT 1992 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 2013-05-27T17:55:09Z TAC recommendations for North-East Arctic cod have traditionally been based on F max , but F med might be preferable to F max as a biological reference point. However, the current F med estimate of more than twice F max appears high, and there is reason to question the basis for the estimate. Furthermore, the robustness of F med and its related points F tow and F high to changes in the parameters used for their estimation has not been adequately investigated. The effect of the various parameters on the estimates of the biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock is tested. F 0·1 and F max calculated on a per-recruit basis are strongly dependent on the parameters used to estimate them, especially the natural mortality. Fmcd is generally more robust and the estimates of F t a and F hing are also relatively stable. A crucial factor in the estimation of F med for cod is whether the maturity is density dependent or not. It is suggested that the F med -family of reference points provides a better founded basis for management of these stocks than F 0.1 and F max . Text Arctic cod Arctic HighWire Press (Stanford University) Arctic Tac ENVELOPE(-59.517,-59.517,-62.500,-62.500) ICES Journal of Marine Science 49 2 155 166 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
HighWire Press (Stanford University) |
op_collection_id |
fthighwire |
language |
English |
topic |
Articles |
spellingShingle |
Articles Jakobsen, Tore Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock |
topic_facet |
Articles |
description |
TAC recommendations for North-East Arctic cod have traditionally been based on F max , but F med might be preferable to F max as a biological reference point. However, the current F med estimate of more than twice F max appears high, and there is reason to question the basis for the estimate. Furthermore, the robustness of F med and its related points F tow and F high to changes in the parameters used for their estimation has not been adequately investigated. The effect of the various parameters on the estimates of the biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock is tested. F 0·1 and F max calculated on a per-recruit basis are strongly dependent on the parameters used to estimate them, especially the natural mortality. Fmcd is generally more robust and the estimates of F t a and F hing are also relatively stable. A crucial factor in the estimation of F med for cod is whether the maturity is density dependent or not. It is suggested that the F med -family of reference points provides a better founded basis for management of these stocks than F 0.1 and F max . |
format |
Text |
author |
Jakobsen, Tore |
author_facet |
Jakobsen, Tore |
author_sort |
Jakobsen, Tore |
title |
Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock |
title_short |
Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock |
title_full |
Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock |
title_fullStr |
Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biological reference points for North-East Arctic cod and haddock |
title_sort |
biological reference points for north-east arctic cod and haddock |
publisher |
Oxford University Press |
publishDate |
1992 |
url |
http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/155 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-59.517,-59.517,-62.500,-62.500) |
geographic |
Arctic Tac |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Tac |
genre |
Arctic cod Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic cod Arctic |
op_relation |
http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 |
op_rights |
Copyright (C) 1992, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.2.155 |
container_title |
ICES Journal of Marine Science |
container_volume |
49 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
155 |
op_container_end_page |
166 |
_version_ |
1766304210532433920 |