Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms

Every spring for the past two decades, depletion of stratospheric ozone has caused increases in ultraviolet B radiation (UVB, 280–320 nm) reaching Antarctic terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Research efforts to evaluate the impact of this phenomenon have focused on phytoplankton under the assumption...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Zoologist
Main Authors: Karentz, Deneb, Bosch, Isidro
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/41/1/3
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:icbiol:41/1/3
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:icbiol:41/1/3 2023-05-15T14:03:07+02:00 Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms Karentz, Deneb Bosch, Isidro 2001-02-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/41/1/3 https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3 en eng Oxford University Press http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/41/1/3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3 Copyright (C) 2001, The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Regular Article TEXT 2001 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3 2007-06-24T22:08:17Z Every spring for the past two decades, depletion of stratospheric ozone has caused increases in ultraviolet B radiation (UVB, 280–320 nm) reaching Antarctic terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Research efforts to evaluate the impact of this phenomenon have focused on phytoplankton under the assumption that ecosystem effects will most likely originate through reductions in primary productivity; however, phytoplankton do not represent the only significant component in ecosystem response to elevated UVB. Antarctic bacterioplankton are adversely affected by UVB exposure; and invertebrates and fish, particularly early developmental stages that reside in the plankton, are sensitive to UVB. There is little information available on UV responses of larger Antarctic marine animals ( e.g., birds, seals and whales). Understanding the balance between direct biological damage and species-specific potentials for UV tolerance (protection and recovery) relative to trophic dynamics and biogeochemical cycling is a crucial factor in evaluating the overall impact of ozone depletion. After more than a decade of research, much information has been gathered about UV-photobiology in Antarctica; however, a definitive quantitative assessment of the effect of ozone depletion on the Antarctic ecosystem still eludes us. It is only obvious that ozone depletion has not had a catastrophic effect in the Antarctic region. The long-term consequences of possible subtle shifts in species composition and trophic interactions are still uncertain. Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica HighWire Press (Stanford University) Antarctic The Antarctic American Zoologist 41 1 3 16
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Regular Article
spellingShingle Regular Article
Karentz, Deneb
Bosch, Isidro
Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms
topic_facet Regular Article
description Every spring for the past two decades, depletion of stratospheric ozone has caused increases in ultraviolet B radiation (UVB, 280–320 nm) reaching Antarctic terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Research efforts to evaluate the impact of this phenomenon have focused on phytoplankton under the assumption that ecosystem effects will most likely originate through reductions in primary productivity; however, phytoplankton do not represent the only significant component in ecosystem response to elevated UVB. Antarctic bacterioplankton are adversely affected by UVB exposure; and invertebrates and fish, particularly early developmental stages that reside in the plankton, are sensitive to UVB. There is little information available on UV responses of larger Antarctic marine animals ( e.g., birds, seals and whales). Understanding the balance between direct biological damage and species-specific potentials for UV tolerance (protection and recovery) relative to trophic dynamics and biogeochemical cycling is a crucial factor in evaluating the overall impact of ozone depletion. After more than a decade of research, much information has been gathered about UV-photobiology in Antarctica; however, a definitive quantitative assessment of the effect of ozone depletion on the Antarctic ecosystem still eludes us. It is only obvious that ozone depletion has not had a catastrophic effect in the Antarctic region. The long-term consequences of possible subtle shifts in species composition and trophic interactions are still uncertain.
format Text
author Karentz, Deneb
Bosch, Isidro
author_facet Karentz, Deneb
Bosch, Isidro
author_sort Karentz, Deneb
title Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms
title_short Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms
title_full Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms
title_fullStr Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Ozone-Related Increases in Ultraviolet Radiation on Antarctic Marine Organisms
title_sort influence of ozone-related increases in ultraviolet radiation on antarctic marine organisms
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2001
url http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/41/1/3
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_relation http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/41/1/3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3
op_rights Copyright (C) 2001, The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.1.3
container_title American Zoologist
container_volume 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
op_container_end_page 16
_version_ 1766273646692663296