Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the neonatal outcome and the prevalence of congenital malformations in children born after IVF in northern Finland we carried out a population-based study with matched controls. METHODS: Firstly, 304 IVF children born in 1990–1995 were compared with 569 controls, representing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human Reproduction
Main Authors: Koivurova, Sari, Hartikainen, Anna-Liisa, Gissler, Mika, Hemminki, Elina, Sovio, Ulla, Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/5/1391
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391
_version_ 1821661386668769280
author Koivurova, Sari
Hartikainen, Anna-Liisa
Gissler, Mika
Hemminki, Elina
Sovio, Ulla
Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
author_facet Koivurova, Sari
Hartikainen, Anna-Liisa
Gissler, Mika
Hemminki, Elina
Sovio, Ulla
Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
author_sort Koivurova, Sari
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1391
container_title Human Reproduction
container_volume 17
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the neonatal outcome and the prevalence of congenital malformations in children born after IVF in northern Finland we carried out a population-based study with matched controls. METHODS: Firstly, 304 IVF children born in 1990–1995 were compared with 569 controls, representing the general population in proportion of multiple births, randomly chosen from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (FMBR) and matched for sex, year of birth, area of residence, parity, maternal age and social class. Secondly, plurality matched controls ( n = 103) for IVF twins ( n =103) were randomly chosen from the FMBR and analysed separately. Additionally, IVF singletons ( n = 153) were compared with singleton controls ( n = 287). Mortality rates were compared with national figures from FMBR. RESULTS: Most mortality rates were twice as high as national figures in the general population. When compared with the control group representing the general population, the incidences of preterm birth [odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7–8.6], very low birth weight (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.0–19.0), low birth weight (OR 9.8, 95% CI 5.6–17.3), neonatal morbidity (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7–3.4) and hospitalization (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2–4.6) were significantly higher in the IVF group. The prevalence of heart malformations was four-fold in the IVF population than in the controls representing the general population (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.4–11.7). CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcome after IVF is worse than in the general population with similar maternal age, parity and social standing, mainly due to the large proportion of multifetal births after IVF. The higher prevalence of heart malformations does not solely arise from multiplicity but from other causes. In order to improve neonatal outcome after IVF, the number of embryos transferred should be limited to a minimum.
format Text
genre Northern Finland
genre_facet Northern Finland
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:humrep:17/5/1391
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id fthighwire
op_container_end_page 1398
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391
op_relation http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/5/1391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391
op_rights Copyright (C) 2002, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
publishDate 2002
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:humrep:17/5/1391 2025-01-16T23:52:45+00:00 Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization Koivurova, Sari Hartikainen, Anna-Liisa Gissler, Mika Hemminki, Elina Sovio, Ulla Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta 2002-05-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/5/1391 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391 en eng Oxford University Press http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/5/1391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391 Copyright (C) 2002, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Reproductive epidemiology TEXT 2002 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391 2013-05-28T04:34:52Z BACKGROUND: To evaluate the neonatal outcome and the prevalence of congenital malformations in children born after IVF in northern Finland we carried out a population-based study with matched controls. METHODS: Firstly, 304 IVF children born in 1990–1995 were compared with 569 controls, representing the general population in proportion of multiple births, randomly chosen from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (FMBR) and matched for sex, year of birth, area of residence, parity, maternal age and social class. Secondly, plurality matched controls ( n = 103) for IVF twins ( n =103) were randomly chosen from the FMBR and analysed separately. Additionally, IVF singletons ( n = 153) were compared with singleton controls ( n = 287). Mortality rates were compared with national figures from FMBR. RESULTS: Most mortality rates were twice as high as national figures in the general population. When compared with the control group representing the general population, the incidences of preterm birth [odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7–8.6], very low birth weight (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.0–19.0), low birth weight (OR 9.8, 95% CI 5.6–17.3), neonatal morbidity (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7–3.4) and hospitalization (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2–4.6) were significantly higher in the IVF group. The prevalence of heart malformations was four-fold in the IVF population than in the controls representing the general population (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.4–11.7). CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcome after IVF is worse than in the general population with similar maternal age, parity and social standing, mainly due to the large proportion of multifetal births after IVF. The higher prevalence of heart malformations does not solely arise from multiplicity but from other causes. In order to improve neonatal outcome after IVF, the number of embryos transferred should be limited to a minimum. Text Northern Finland HighWire Press (Stanford University) Human Reproduction 17 5 1391 1398
spellingShingle Reproductive epidemiology
Koivurova, Sari
Hartikainen, Anna-Liisa
Gissler, Mika
Hemminki, Elina
Sovio, Ulla
Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
title Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
title_full Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
title_fullStr Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
title_short Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
title_sort neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization
topic Reproductive epidemiology
topic_facet Reproductive epidemiology
url http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/5/1391
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1391