Upper mantle shear structure of North America

The waveforms and travel times of S and SS phases in the range 10°–60° have been used to derive upper mantle shear velocity structures for two distinct tectonic provinces in North America. Data from earthquakes on the East Pacific Rise recorded at stations in western North America were used to deriv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: Grand, Stephen P., Helmberger, Donald V.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 1984
Subjects:
Online Access:http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/76/2/399
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:76/2/399
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:76/2/399 2023-05-15T16:30:18+02:00 Upper mantle shear structure of North America Grand, Stephen P. Helmberger, Donald V. 1984-02-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/76/2/399 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x en eng Oxford University Press http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/76/2/399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x Copyright (C) 1984, Oxford University Press Articles TEXT 1984 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x 2015-02-28T23:03:05Z The waveforms and travel times of S and SS phases in the range 10°–60° have been used to derive upper mantle shear velocity structures for two distinct tectonic provinces in North America. Data from earthquakes on the East Pacific Rise recorded at stations in western North America were used to derive a tectonic upper mantle model. Events on the north-west coast of North America and earthquakes off the coast of Greenland provided the data to investigate the upper mantle under the Canadian shield. All branches from the triplications due to velocity jumps near 400 and 660 km were observed in both areas. Using synthetic seismograms to model these observations placed tight constraints on heterogeneity in the upper mantle and on the details of its structure. SS–S travel-time differences of 30 s along with consistent differences in waveforms between the two data sets require substantial heterogeneity to at least 350 km depth. Velocities in the upper 170 km of the shield are about 10 per cent higher than in the tectonic area. At 250 km depth the shield velocities are still greater by about 4.5 per cent and they gradually merge near 400 km. Below 400 km no evidence for heterogeneity was found. The two models both have first-order discontinuities of 4.5 per cent at 405 km and 7.5 per cent at 695 km. Both models also have lids with lower velocities beneath. In the western model the lid is very thin and of relatively low velocity. In the shield the lid is 170 km thick with very high velocity (4.78 km s-1); below it the velocity decreases to about 4.65 km s-1. Aside from these features the models are relatively smooth, the major difference between them being a larger gradient in the tectonic region from 200 to 400 km. Text Greenland HighWire Press (Stanford University) Greenland Pacific Geophysical Journal International 76 2 399 438
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Grand, Stephen P.
Helmberger, Donald V.
Upper mantle shear structure of North America
topic_facet Articles
description The waveforms and travel times of S and SS phases in the range 10°–60° have been used to derive upper mantle shear velocity structures for two distinct tectonic provinces in North America. Data from earthquakes on the East Pacific Rise recorded at stations in western North America were used to derive a tectonic upper mantle model. Events on the north-west coast of North America and earthquakes off the coast of Greenland provided the data to investigate the upper mantle under the Canadian shield. All branches from the triplications due to velocity jumps near 400 and 660 km were observed in both areas. Using synthetic seismograms to model these observations placed tight constraints on heterogeneity in the upper mantle and on the details of its structure. SS–S travel-time differences of 30 s along with consistent differences in waveforms between the two data sets require substantial heterogeneity to at least 350 km depth. Velocities in the upper 170 km of the shield are about 10 per cent higher than in the tectonic area. At 250 km depth the shield velocities are still greater by about 4.5 per cent and they gradually merge near 400 km. Below 400 km no evidence for heterogeneity was found. The two models both have first-order discontinuities of 4.5 per cent at 405 km and 7.5 per cent at 695 km. Both models also have lids with lower velocities beneath. In the western model the lid is very thin and of relatively low velocity. In the shield the lid is 170 km thick with very high velocity (4.78 km s-1); below it the velocity decreases to about 4.65 km s-1. Aside from these features the models are relatively smooth, the major difference between them being a larger gradient in the tectonic region from 200 to 400 km.
format Text
author Grand, Stephen P.
Helmberger, Donald V.
author_facet Grand, Stephen P.
Helmberger, Donald V.
author_sort Grand, Stephen P.
title Upper mantle shear structure of North America
title_short Upper mantle shear structure of North America
title_full Upper mantle shear structure of North America
title_fullStr Upper mantle shear structure of North America
title_full_unstemmed Upper mantle shear structure of North America
title_sort upper mantle shear structure of north america
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 1984
url http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/76/2/399
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x
geographic Greenland
Pacific
geographic_facet Greenland
Pacific
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/76/2/399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x
op_rights Copyright (C) 1984, Oxford University Press
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05053.x
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 76
container_issue 2
container_start_page 399
op_container_end_page 438
_version_ 1766020013504856064