Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments

Two models—which lead to signals of opposite sign—are currently at the forefront of magnetoclimatological debates. In the classic sites of the Chinese Loess Plateau, soil formation during interglacials leads to magnetic enhancement in the palaeosols. In other regions (Alaska, Siberia), magnetic susc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Author: Evans, M. E.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/144/2/495
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:144/2/495
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:144/2/495 2023-05-15T18:48:51+02:00 Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments Evans, M. E. 2001-02-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/144/2/495 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x en eng Oxford University Press http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/144/2/495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x Copyright (C) 2001, Oxford University Press Articles TEXT 2001 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x 2013-05-27T17:42:49Z Two models—which lead to signals of opposite sign—are currently at the forefront of magnetoclimatological debates. In the classic sites of the Chinese Loess Plateau, soil formation during interglacials leads to magnetic enhancement in the palaeosols. In other regions (Alaska, Siberia), magnetic susceptibility peaks during glacial intervals. By looking at the broader picture, the relationship between these two models can be clarified. A simple qualitative analysis based on density sorting then determines the regimes under which one or the other dominates. Published data from Siberia, China, the Czech Republic and elsewhere permit a certain degree of quantification, and lead to the conclusion that proximal sites are likely to manifest Alaskan/Siberian‐type magnetoclimatological patterns. Beyond a few hundred kilometres, however, distal sites will be dominated by Chinese‐type patterns. Text Alaska Siberia HighWire Press (Stanford University) Geophysical Journal International 144 2 495 497
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Evans, M. E.
Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
topic_facet Articles
description Two models—which lead to signals of opposite sign—are currently at the forefront of magnetoclimatological debates. In the classic sites of the Chinese Loess Plateau, soil formation during interglacials leads to magnetic enhancement in the palaeosols. In other regions (Alaska, Siberia), magnetic susceptibility peaks during glacial intervals. By looking at the broader picture, the relationship between these two models can be clarified. A simple qualitative analysis based on density sorting then determines the regimes under which one or the other dominates. Published data from Siberia, China, the Czech Republic and elsewhere permit a certain degree of quantification, and lead to the conclusion that proximal sites are likely to manifest Alaskan/Siberian‐type magnetoclimatological patterns. Beyond a few hundred kilometres, however, distal sites will be dominated by Chinese‐type patterns.
format Text
author Evans, M. E.
author_facet Evans, M. E.
author_sort Evans, M. E.
title Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
title_short Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
title_full Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
title_fullStr Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
title_full_unstemmed Magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
title_sort magnetoclimatology of aeolian sediments
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2001
url http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/144/2/495
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x
genre Alaska
Siberia
genre_facet Alaska
Siberia
op_relation http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/144/2/495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x
op_rights Copyright (C) 2001, Oxford University Press
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540X.2000.01317.x
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 144
container_issue 2
container_start_page 495
op_container_end_page 497
_version_ 1766242156424462336