Continuous seismic threshold monitoring
Continuous threshold monitoring is a technique for using a seismic network to monitor a geographical area continuously in time. The method provides, at a given confidence level, a continuous assessment of the upper magnitude limit of possible seismic events that might have occurred in the target are...
Published in: | Geophysical Journal International |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
1992
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/111/3/505 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x |
id |
fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:111/3/505 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:111/3/505 2023-05-15T15:39:11+02:00 Continuous seismic threshold monitoring Ringdal, Frode Kværna, Tormod 1992-12-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/111/3/505 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x en eng Oxford University Press http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/111/3/505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x Copyright (C) 1992, Oxford University Press Articles TEXT 1992 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x 2016-11-16T16:54:51Z Continuous threshold monitoring is a technique for using a seismic network to monitor a geographical area continuously in time. The method provides, at a given confidence level, a continuous assessment of the upper magnitude limit of possible seismic events that might have occurred in the target area. Two approaches are presented in this paper. Site-specific threshold monitoring: by ‘focusing’ a seismic network on a specific target site, continuous threshold monitoring of that site is achieved. We optimize the monitoring capability by tuning the frequency filters and array beams to known characteristics from previously recorded events at the site. We define the threshold trace for the network as the continuous time trace of computed upper magnitude limits of seismic events in the target area, at a 90 per cent confidence level. As an example, we have conducted a one-week monitoring experiment of the northern Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site, using the Fennoscandian regional array network (NORESS, ARCESS, FINESA). We find that the threshold trace is below m b = 2.5 more than 99 per cent of the time. 34 peaks exceed m b = 2.5. All of these peaks correspond to interfering seismic events that have been independently located by a teleseismic or regional network. During the entire one-week time period, the threshold trace exceeded m b = 2.5 only for 43 min. Regional threshold monitoring: this involves conducting site-specific monitoring of a dense grid of geographical aiming points and requires the development of generic phase attenuation relationships for covering an extended geographical region. Using again the Fennoscandian regional array network, we illustrate the regional threshold monitoring approach by maps with colour contour displays. We demonstrate that the network thresholds in Fennoscandia and adjacent regions show strong regional dependence. The thresholds are below m b = 0.5 close to each array (<300 km distance) and range from m b = 2.0 to 2.5 in parts of the Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea. The ... Text Barents Sea Fennoscandia Fennoscandian Norwegian Sea Novaya Zemlya HighWire Press (Stanford University) Barents Sea Norwegian Sea Geophysical Journal International 111 3 505 514 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
HighWire Press (Stanford University) |
op_collection_id |
fthighwire |
language |
English |
topic |
Articles |
spellingShingle |
Articles Ringdal, Frode Kværna, Tormod Continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
topic_facet |
Articles |
description |
Continuous threshold monitoring is a technique for using a seismic network to monitor a geographical area continuously in time. The method provides, at a given confidence level, a continuous assessment of the upper magnitude limit of possible seismic events that might have occurred in the target area. Two approaches are presented in this paper. Site-specific threshold monitoring: by ‘focusing’ a seismic network on a specific target site, continuous threshold monitoring of that site is achieved. We optimize the monitoring capability by tuning the frequency filters and array beams to known characteristics from previously recorded events at the site. We define the threshold trace for the network as the continuous time trace of computed upper magnitude limits of seismic events in the target area, at a 90 per cent confidence level. As an example, we have conducted a one-week monitoring experiment of the northern Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site, using the Fennoscandian regional array network (NORESS, ARCESS, FINESA). We find that the threshold trace is below m b = 2.5 more than 99 per cent of the time. 34 peaks exceed m b = 2.5. All of these peaks correspond to interfering seismic events that have been independently located by a teleseismic or regional network. During the entire one-week time period, the threshold trace exceeded m b = 2.5 only for 43 min. Regional threshold monitoring: this involves conducting site-specific monitoring of a dense grid of geographical aiming points and requires the development of generic phase attenuation relationships for covering an extended geographical region. Using again the Fennoscandian regional array network, we illustrate the regional threshold monitoring approach by maps with colour contour displays. We demonstrate that the network thresholds in Fennoscandia and adjacent regions show strong regional dependence. The thresholds are below m b = 0.5 close to each array (<300 km distance) and range from m b = 2.0 to 2.5 in parts of the Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea. The ... |
format |
Text |
author |
Ringdal, Frode Kværna, Tormod |
author_facet |
Ringdal, Frode Kværna, Tormod |
author_sort |
Ringdal, Frode |
title |
Continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
title_short |
Continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
title_full |
Continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
title_fullStr |
Continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed |
Continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
title_sort |
continuous seismic threshold monitoring |
publisher |
Oxford University Press |
publishDate |
1992 |
url |
http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/111/3/505 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x |
geographic |
Barents Sea Norwegian Sea |
geographic_facet |
Barents Sea Norwegian Sea |
genre |
Barents Sea Fennoscandia Fennoscandian Norwegian Sea Novaya Zemlya |
genre_facet |
Barents Sea Fennoscandia Fennoscandian Norwegian Sea Novaya Zemlya |
op_relation |
http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/111/3/505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x |
op_rights |
Copyright (C) 1992, Oxford University Press |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02108.x |
container_title |
Geophysical Journal International |
container_volume |
111 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
505 |
op_container_end_page |
514 |
_version_ |
1766370642193547264 |