Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation

Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly being performed in electrophysiology laboratories. Pericardial effusion (PE) is certainly one of the most frequently observed complications during AF ablation. The aim of our study was to investigate the incidence and outcome of PE following cry...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europace
Main Authors: Chierchia, Gian Battista, Capulzini, Lucio, Droogmans, Steven, Sorgente, Antonio, Sarkozy, Andrea, Müller-Burri, Andreas, Paparella, Gaetano, Carlo, de Asmundis, Yazaki, Yoshinao, Kerkhove, Dirk, Van Camp, Guy, Brugada, Pedro
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/eup422v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:europace:eup422v1
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:europace:eup422v1 2023-05-15T15:09:34+02:00 Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation Chierchia, Gian Battista Capulzini, Lucio Droogmans, Steven Sorgente, Antonio Sarkozy, Andrea Müller-Burri, Andreas Paparella, Gaetano Carlo, de Asmundis Yazaki, Yoshinao Kerkhove, Dirk Van Camp, Guy Brugada, Pedro 2010-01-06 22:27:57.0 text/html http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/eup422v1 https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422 en eng Oxford University Press http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/eup422v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422 Copyright (C) 2010, European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CLINICAL RESEARCH TEXT 2010 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422 2010-05-01T12:55:02Z Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly being performed in electrophysiology laboratories. Pericardial effusion (PE) is certainly one of the most frequently observed complications during AF ablation. The aim of our study was to investigate the incidence and outcome of PE following cryothermal energy balloon ablation (CBA) in comparison with conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with a focal radiofrequency (RF) catheter. Methods and results A total of 133 consecutive patients (105 males) with paroxysmal AF were included in this study. Forty-six patients (36 males) underwent CBA (Arctic Front, Medtronic, USA) and 87 (69 males) point-by-point RF ablation guided by electroanatomical mapping (Carto, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Ablation was performed under general anaesthesia with both techniques. All patients underwent a 2D transthoracic echocardiogram within 24 h before and after the procedure as routinely performed in our centre. Pericardial effusion was detected in 19 (14.2%) of 133 patients. Sixteen patients presented mild effusion, one moderate effusion, and two pericardial tamponades. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PE between the cryoballoon and the RF group (11 vs. 16%). A longer procedural time, coronary artery disease, and arterial hypertension were found to be independent predictors of PE during AF ablation. Conclusion Pericardial effusion occurred in a similar proportion following CBA and RF ablation for AF. Pericardial effusion was mostly mild and asymptomatic, with benign clinical outcome not requiring additional hospitalization days. Text Arctic HighWire Press (Stanford University) Arctic Europace 12 3 337 341
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic CLINICAL RESEARCH
spellingShingle CLINICAL RESEARCH
Chierchia, Gian Battista
Capulzini, Lucio
Droogmans, Steven
Sorgente, Antonio
Sarkozy, Andrea
Müller-Burri, Andreas
Paparella, Gaetano
Carlo, de Asmundis
Yazaki, Yoshinao
Kerkhove, Dirk
Van Camp, Guy
Brugada, Pedro
Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
topic_facet CLINICAL RESEARCH
description Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly being performed in electrophysiology laboratories. Pericardial effusion (PE) is certainly one of the most frequently observed complications during AF ablation. The aim of our study was to investigate the incidence and outcome of PE following cryothermal energy balloon ablation (CBA) in comparison with conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with a focal radiofrequency (RF) catheter. Methods and results A total of 133 consecutive patients (105 males) with paroxysmal AF were included in this study. Forty-six patients (36 males) underwent CBA (Arctic Front, Medtronic, USA) and 87 (69 males) point-by-point RF ablation guided by electroanatomical mapping (Carto, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Ablation was performed under general anaesthesia with both techniques. All patients underwent a 2D transthoracic echocardiogram within 24 h before and after the procedure as routinely performed in our centre. Pericardial effusion was detected in 19 (14.2%) of 133 patients. Sixteen patients presented mild effusion, one moderate effusion, and two pericardial tamponades. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PE between the cryoballoon and the RF group (11 vs. 16%). A longer procedural time, coronary artery disease, and arterial hypertension were found to be independent predictors of PE during AF ablation. Conclusion Pericardial effusion occurred in a similar proportion following CBA and RF ablation for AF. Pericardial effusion was mostly mild and asymptomatic, with benign clinical outcome not requiring additional hospitalization days.
format Text
author Chierchia, Gian Battista
Capulzini, Lucio
Droogmans, Steven
Sorgente, Antonio
Sarkozy, Andrea
Müller-Burri, Andreas
Paparella, Gaetano
Carlo, de Asmundis
Yazaki, Yoshinao
Kerkhove, Dirk
Van Camp, Guy
Brugada, Pedro
author_facet Chierchia, Gian Battista
Capulzini, Lucio
Droogmans, Steven
Sorgente, Antonio
Sarkozy, Andrea
Müller-Burri, Andreas
Paparella, Gaetano
Carlo, de Asmundis
Yazaki, Yoshinao
Kerkhove, Dirk
Van Camp, Guy
Brugada, Pedro
author_sort Chierchia, Gian Battista
title Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
title_short Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
title_full Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
title_fullStr Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
title_full_unstemmed Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
title_sort pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2010
url http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/eup422v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/eup422v1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422
op_rights Copyright (C) 2010, European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup422
container_title Europace
container_volume 12
container_issue 3
container_start_page 337
op_container_end_page 341
_version_ 1766340730029080576