DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION

Discourse marker like (DML) is recognized as a highly stigmatized feature of American English, one with strong ideological ties to inarticulate, “Valley Girl” speech. Previous work suggests that individual listeners form impressions that both reference and perpetuate DML's status, as DML-contai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Speech
Main Authors: Hesson, Ashley, Shellgren, Madeline
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Duke University Press 2015
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/154
https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:ddasp:90/2/154
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:ddasp:90/2/154 2023-05-15T16:01:15+02:00 DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION Hesson, Ashley Shellgren, Madeline 2015-01-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/154 https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313 en eng Duke University Press http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313 Copyright (C) 2015, American Dialect Society Articles TEXT 2015 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313 2016-11-16T17:29:39Z Discourse marker like (DML) is recognized as a highly stigmatized feature of American English, one with strong ideological ties to inarticulate, “Valley Girl” speech. Previous work suggests that individual listeners form impressions that both reference and perpetuate DML's status, as DML-containing speech is judged as friendlier and less intelligent than controls. Though informative, such studies cannot speak to the magnitude and/or stability of DML-based impressions nor to the potential interactions between said effects and individual processing styles. The current study continuously measures real-time listener evaluations of speech samples differing only by a single use of DML using a dynamic motion-capture interface. It also integrates a measure of participants' social interaction preferences and cognitive flexibility, thus assessing the influence of individual differences on participants' moment-by-moment impression formation. Our results indicate that DML has an initial negative effect on both <scp>friendliness</scp> and <scp>intelligence</scp> ratings. While the “unfriendly” perception is relatively transient, the “unintelligent” evaluation persists and intensifies over time. Individuals with relatively high levels of social aptitude and/or cognitive flexibility are largely responsible for these trends. Collectively, these results offer a preliminary characterization of the sociocognitive interplay between individual, interpersonal, and societal influences on attitude formation. Text DML HighWire Press (Stanford University) American Speech 90 2 154 186
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Hesson, Ashley
Shellgren, Madeline
DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION
topic_facet Articles
description Discourse marker like (DML) is recognized as a highly stigmatized feature of American English, one with strong ideological ties to inarticulate, “Valley Girl” speech. Previous work suggests that individual listeners form impressions that both reference and perpetuate DML's status, as DML-containing speech is judged as friendlier and less intelligent than controls. Though informative, such studies cannot speak to the magnitude and/or stability of DML-based impressions nor to the potential interactions between said effects and individual processing styles. The current study continuously measures real-time listener evaluations of speech samples differing only by a single use of DML using a dynamic motion-capture interface. It also integrates a measure of participants' social interaction preferences and cognitive flexibility, thus assessing the influence of individual differences on participants' moment-by-moment impression formation. Our results indicate that DML has an initial negative effect on both <scp>friendliness</scp> and <scp>intelligence</scp> ratings. While the “unfriendly” perception is relatively transient, the “unintelligent” evaluation persists and intensifies over time. Individuals with relatively high levels of social aptitude and/or cognitive flexibility are largely responsible for these trends. Collectively, these results offer a preliminary characterization of the sociocognitive interplay between individual, interpersonal, and societal influences on attitude formation.
format Text
author Hesson, Ashley
Shellgren, Madeline
author_facet Hesson, Ashley
Shellgren, Madeline
author_sort Hesson, Ashley
title DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION
title_short DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION
title_full DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION
title_fullStr DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION
title_full_unstemmed DISCOURSE MARKER LIKE IN REAL TIME: CHARACTERIZING THE TIME-COURSE OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC IMPRESSION FORMATION
title_sort discourse marker like in real time: characterizing the time-course of sociolinguistic impression formation
publisher Duke University Press
publishDate 2015
url http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/154
https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313
op_rights Copyright (C) 2015, American Dialect Society
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3130313
container_title American Speech
container_volume 90
container_issue 2
container_start_page 154
op_container_end_page 186
_version_ 1766397196915179520