Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition

Outbreaks of illness variously identified by a number of terms, including epidemic neuromyasthenia, myalgic encephalomyelitis, Iceland disease, and atypical poliomyelitis, have been reported from many countries during the past 45 years. Since the first well-described outbreak occurring in 1934, >...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical Infectious Diseases
Main Author: Levine, Paul H.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/18/Supplement_1/S16
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:cid:18/Supplement_1/S16
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:cid:18/Supplement_1/S16 2023-05-15T16:50:12+02:00 Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition Levine, Paul H. 1994-01-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/18/Supplement_1/S16 https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16 en eng Oxford University Press http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/18/Supplement_1/S16 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16 Copyright (C) 1994, Infectious Diseases Society of America Part 1: Epidemiology of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome TEXT 1994 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16 2011-03-13T12:56:40Z Outbreaks of illness variously identified by a number of terms, including epidemic neuromyasthenia, myalgic encephalomyelitis, Iceland disease, and atypical poliomyelitis, have been reported from many countries during the past 45 years. Since the first well-described outbreak occurring in 1934, >60 outbreaks have been reported, but few of these have been described in considerable detail. These outbreaks are usually cited in historical reports of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) since each of these outbreaks appears to contain a number of cases meeting the current case definition of CFS. There has been inadequate attention given to the fact that epidemic neuromyasthenia and related clusters characterized by various complaints, including fatigue, do not have an accepted epidemiological or clinical definition, and only rarely have descriptions of these clusters included a specific case definition. When such case definitions have been applied, the occurrence of cases meeting the current case definition for CFS appears to be both variable and infrequent. This report utilizes examples of several well-documented outbreaks to emphasize specific aspects that should be considered in the investigation of future clusters. Text Iceland HighWire Press (Stanford University) Clinical Infectious Diseases 18 Supplement_1 S16 S20
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Part 1: Epidemiology of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
spellingShingle Part 1: Epidemiology of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Levine, Paul H.
Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition
topic_facet Part 1: Epidemiology of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
description Outbreaks of illness variously identified by a number of terms, including epidemic neuromyasthenia, myalgic encephalomyelitis, Iceland disease, and atypical poliomyelitis, have been reported from many countries during the past 45 years. Since the first well-described outbreak occurring in 1934, >60 outbreaks have been reported, but few of these have been described in considerable detail. These outbreaks are usually cited in historical reports of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) since each of these outbreaks appears to contain a number of cases meeting the current case definition of CFS. There has been inadequate attention given to the fact that epidemic neuromyasthenia and related clusters characterized by various complaints, including fatigue, do not have an accepted epidemiological or clinical definition, and only rarely have descriptions of these clusters included a specific case definition. When such case definitions have been applied, the occurrence of cases meeting the current case definition for CFS appears to be both variable and infrequent. This report utilizes examples of several well-documented outbreaks to emphasize specific aspects that should be considered in the investigation of future clusters.
format Text
author Levine, Paul H.
author_facet Levine, Paul H.
author_sort Levine, Paul H.
title Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition
title_short Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition
title_full Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition
title_fullStr Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition
title_full_unstemmed Epidemic Neuromyasthenia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Epidemiological Importance of a Cluster Definition
title_sort epidemic neuromyasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome: epidemiological importance of a cluster definition
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 1994
url http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/18/Supplement_1/S16
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/18/Supplement_1/S16
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16
op_rights Copyright (C) 1994, Infectious Diseases Society of America
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S16
container_title Clinical Infectious Diseases
container_volume 18
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page S16
op_container_end_page S20
_version_ 1766040368972824576