Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations

Sea otters are well-known tool users, employing objects such as rocks or shells to break open hard-shelled invertebrate prey. However, little is known about how the frequency of tool use varies among sea otter populations and the factors that drive these differences. We examined 17 years of observat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Fujii, Jessica A., Ralls, Katherine, Tinker, Martin Tim
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru220v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:aru220v1
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:aru220v1 2023-05-15T18:48:49+02:00 Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations Fujii, Jessica A. Ralls, Katherine Tinker, Martin Tim 2014-12-22 00:01:53.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru220v1 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru220v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220 Copyright (C) 2014, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Original Article TEXT 2014 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220 2016-11-16T18:36:58Z Sea otters are well-known tool users, employing objects such as rocks or shells to break open hard-shelled invertebrate prey. However, little is known about how the frequency of tool use varies among sea otter populations and the factors that drive these differences. We examined 17 years of observational data on prey capture and tool use from 8 sea otter populations ranging from southern California to the Aleutian Islands in Alaska. There were significant differences in the diets of these populations as well as variation in the frequency of tool use. Sea otters at Amchitka Island, Alaska, used tools on less than 1% of dives that resulted in the capture of prey compared with approximately 16% in Monterey, California. The percentage of individuals in the population that used tools ranged from 10% to 93%. In all populations, marine snails and thick-shelled bivalves were most likely to be associated with tool use, whereas soft-bodied prey items such as worms and sea stars were the least likely. The probability that a tool would be used on a given prey type varied across populations. The morphology of the prey item being handled and the prevalence of various types of prey in local diets were major ecological drivers of tool use: together they accounted for about 64% of the variation in tool-use frequency among populations. The remaining variation may be related to changes in the relative costs and benefits to an individual otter of learning to use tools effectively under differing ecological circumstances. Text Alaska Aleutian Islands HighWire Press (Stanford University) Amchitka ENVELOPE(178.878,178.878,51.567,51.567) Amchitka Island ENVELOPE(178.983,178.983,51.542,51.542) Behavioral Ecology 26 2 519 526
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Original Article
spellingShingle Original Article
Fujii, Jessica A.
Ralls, Katherine
Tinker, Martin Tim
Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
topic_facet Original Article
description Sea otters are well-known tool users, employing objects such as rocks or shells to break open hard-shelled invertebrate prey. However, little is known about how the frequency of tool use varies among sea otter populations and the factors that drive these differences. We examined 17 years of observational data on prey capture and tool use from 8 sea otter populations ranging from southern California to the Aleutian Islands in Alaska. There were significant differences in the diets of these populations as well as variation in the frequency of tool use. Sea otters at Amchitka Island, Alaska, used tools on less than 1% of dives that resulted in the capture of prey compared with approximately 16% in Monterey, California. The percentage of individuals in the population that used tools ranged from 10% to 93%. In all populations, marine snails and thick-shelled bivalves were most likely to be associated with tool use, whereas soft-bodied prey items such as worms and sea stars were the least likely. The probability that a tool would be used on a given prey type varied across populations. The morphology of the prey item being handled and the prevalence of various types of prey in local diets were major ecological drivers of tool use: together they accounted for about 64% of the variation in tool-use frequency among populations. The remaining variation may be related to changes in the relative costs and benefits to an individual otter of learning to use tools effectively under differing ecological circumstances.
format Text
author Fujii, Jessica A.
Ralls, Katherine
Tinker, Martin Tim
author_facet Fujii, Jessica A.
Ralls, Katherine
Tinker, Martin Tim
author_sort Fujii, Jessica A.
title Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_short Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_full Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_fullStr Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_full_unstemmed Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_sort ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2014
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru220v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220
long_lat ENVELOPE(178.878,178.878,51.567,51.567)
ENVELOPE(178.983,178.983,51.542,51.542)
geographic Amchitka
Amchitka Island
geographic_facet Amchitka
Amchitka Island
genre Alaska
Aleutian Islands
genre_facet Alaska
Aleutian Islands
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru220v1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220
op_rights Copyright (C) 2014, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru220
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 26
container_issue 2
container_start_page 519
op_container_end_page 526
_version_ 1766242115782705152