Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints

Incubation is energetically demanding, but it is debated whether these demands constrain incubation-scheduling (i.e., the length, constancy, and timing of incubation bouts) in cases where both parents incubate. Using 2 methods, we experimentally reduced the energetic demands of incubation in the sem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Bulla, Martin, Cresswell, Will, Rutten, Anne L., Valcu, Mihai, Kempenaers, Bart
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru156v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:aru156v1
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:aru156v1 2023-05-15T15:09:31+02:00 Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints Bulla, Martin Cresswell, Will Rutten, Anne L. Valcu, Mihai Kempenaers, Bart 2014-09-03 23:03:57.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru156v1 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru156v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156 Copyright (C) 2014, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Original Article TEXT 2014 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156 2016-11-16T18:36:58Z Incubation is energetically demanding, but it is debated whether these demands constrain incubation-scheduling (i.e., the length, constancy, and timing of incubation bouts) in cases where both parents incubate. Using 2 methods, we experimentally reduced the energetic demands of incubation in the semipalmated sandpiper, a biparental shorebird breeding in the harsh conditions of the high Arctic. First, we decreased the demands of incubation for 1 parent only by exchanging 1 of the 4 eggs for an artificial egg that heated up when the focal bird incubated. Second, we reanalyzed the data from the only published experimental study that has explicitly tested energetic constraints on incubation-scheduling in a biparentally incubating species (Cresswell et al. 2003). In this experiment, the energetic demands of incubation were decreased for both parents by insulating the nest cup. We expected that the treated birds, in both experiments, would change the length of their incubation bouts, if biparental incubation-scheduling is energetically constrained. However, we found no evidence that heating or insulation of the nest affected the length of incubation bouts: the combined effect of both experiments was an increase in bout length of 3.6min (95% CI: –33 to 40), which is equivalent to a 0.5% increase in the length of the average incubation bout. These results demonstrate that the observed biparental incubation-scheduling in semipalmated sandpipers is not primarily driven by energetic constraints and therefore by the state of the incubating bird, implying that we still do not understand the factors driving biparental incubation-scheduling. Text Arctic HighWire Press (Stanford University) Arctic Behavioral Ecology 26 1 30 37
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Original Article
spellingShingle Original Article
Bulla, Martin
Cresswell, Will
Rutten, Anne L.
Valcu, Mihai
Kempenaers, Bart
Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
topic_facet Original Article
description Incubation is energetically demanding, but it is debated whether these demands constrain incubation-scheduling (i.e., the length, constancy, and timing of incubation bouts) in cases where both parents incubate. Using 2 methods, we experimentally reduced the energetic demands of incubation in the semipalmated sandpiper, a biparental shorebird breeding in the harsh conditions of the high Arctic. First, we decreased the demands of incubation for 1 parent only by exchanging 1 of the 4 eggs for an artificial egg that heated up when the focal bird incubated. Second, we reanalyzed the data from the only published experimental study that has explicitly tested energetic constraints on incubation-scheduling in a biparentally incubating species (Cresswell et al. 2003). In this experiment, the energetic demands of incubation were decreased for both parents by insulating the nest cup. We expected that the treated birds, in both experiments, would change the length of their incubation bouts, if biparental incubation-scheduling is energetically constrained. However, we found no evidence that heating or insulation of the nest affected the length of incubation bouts: the combined effect of both experiments was an increase in bout length of 3.6min (95% CI: –33 to 40), which is equivalent to a 0.5% increase in the length of the average incubation bout. These results demonstrate that the observed biparental incubation-scheduling in semipalmated sandpipers is not primarily driven by energetic constraints and therefore by the state of the incubating bird, implying that we still do not understand the factors driving biparental incubation-scheduling.
format Text
author Bulla, Martin
Cresswell, Will
Rutten, Anne L.
Valcu, Mihai
Kempenaers, Bart
author_facet Bulla, Martin
Cresswell, Will
Rutten, Anne L.
Valcu, Mihai
Kempenaers, Bart
author_sort Bulla, Martin
title Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
title_short Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
title_full Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
title_fullStr Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
title_full_unstemmed Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
title_sort biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2014
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru156v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/aru156v1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156
op_rights Copyright (C) 2014, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru156
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
op_container_end_page 37
_version_ 1766340695604330496