Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population

The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the commo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Waldeck, Peter, Andersson, Malte, Kilpi, Mikael, Öst, Markus
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arm113v2
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:arm113v2
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:arm113v2 2023-05-15T15:55:56+02:00 Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population Waldeck, Peter Andersson, Malte Kilpi, Mikael Öst, Markus 2007-12-06 15:14:05.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arm113v2 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arm113v2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113 Copyright (C) 2007, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Article TEXT 2007 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113 2016-11-16T18:36:16Z The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the common eider Somateria mollissima . The role of relatedness in brood parasitism is debated: some models predict parasite avoidance of related hosts, others predict host–parasite relatedness. We estimate pairwise relatedness from protein fingerprinting of egg albumen in 156 nests, with pairwise nest distances ranging from 1m to 6 km. Relatedness increases significantly from the longest distances to an average of r ≈ 0.09 below 20 m. Brood parasitism is common, and average pairwise relatedness between host and parasite is estimated at 0.18–0.21. Parasites thus do not avoid relatives, and combined with the findings of a similar study in another eider population, the results show that mean host–parasite relatedness is higher than that among close neighbors. High host–parasite relatedness is therefore not an effect of natal philopatry alone; some other form of kin bias is also involved. Recognition and association between birth nest mates is a candidate mechanism for further study. Text Common Eider Somateria mollissima HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 19 1 67 73
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
Waldeck, Peter
Andersson, Malte
Kilpi, Mikael
Öst, Markus
Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
topic_facet Article
description The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the common eider Somateria mollissima . The role of relatedness in brood parasitism is debated: some models predict parasite avoidance of related hosts, others predict host–parasite relatedness. We estimate pairwise relatedness from protein fingerprinting of egg albumen in 156 nests, with pairwise nest distances ranging from 1m to 6 km. Relatedness increases significantly from the longest distances to an average of r ≈ 0.09 below 20 m. Brood parasitism is common, and average pairwise relatedness between host and parasite is estimated at 0.18–0.21. Parasites thus do not avoid relatives, and combined with the findings of a similar study in another eider population, the results show that mean host–parasite relatedness is higher than that among close neighbors. High host–parasite relatedness is therefore not an effect of natal philopatry alone; some other form of kin bias is also involved. Recognition and association between birth nest mates is a candidate mechanism for further study.
format Text
author Waldeck, Peter
Andersson, Malte
Kilpi, Mikael
Öst, Markus
author_facet Waldeck, Peter
Andersson, Malte
Kilpi, Mikael
Öst, Markus
author_sort Waldeck, Peter
title Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_short Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_full Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_fullStr Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_full_unstemmed Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_sort spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2007
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arm113v2
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113
genre Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arm113v2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113
op_rights Copyright (C) 2007, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm113
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
op_container_end_page 73
_version_ 1766391421128933376