Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?

Previous studies of coastal river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) in Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA, documented atypical social organization for mammals. Social groups were composed largely of males, but some males remained solitary year-round and most females were asocial. Because, in carnivores, g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Blundell, Gail M., Ben-David, Merav, Groves, Pamela, Bowyer, R. Terry, Geffen, Eli
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arh110v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:arh110v1
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:arh110v1 2023-05-15T18:48:59+02:00 Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related? Blundell, Gail M. Ben-David, Merav Groves, Pamela Bowyer, R. Terry Geffen, Eli 2004-06-11 11:47:50.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arh110v1 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arh110v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110 Copyright (C) 2004, International Society for Behavioral Ecology PublishAheadOfPrint TEXT 2004 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110 2016-11-16T18:36:19Z Previous studies of coastal river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) in Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA, documented atypical social organization for mammals. Social groups were composed largely of males, but some males remained solitary year-round and most females were asocial. Because, in carnivores, groups are usually composed of highly related individuals but group living also provides advantages unrelated to kinship, we concurrently evaluated the role of relatedness and ecological benefits in sociality among coastal river otters. By using DNA microsatellite analysis and radiotelemetry, we were able to reject the hypothesis that social groups of otters were kin based. In addition, we found no indication of kin avoidance, as would be expected from low dispersal and high local competition. Sociality conferred no reproductive benefits or costs to otters; number of offspring and number of relatives in the population did not differ between social and solitary animals. Solitary males were not older or larger than were social males, and there was no relation between male size and number of offspring, indicating that sexual selection did not mask a potential relation between sociality and reproductive success. Among coastal river otters in this region, sociality could be explained by the benefits obtained from cooperative foraging on high-quality schooling pelagic fishes. Such benefits did not require association with kin, resulting in no selection pressure for kin-based groups. The prediction that the degree of sociality in the population will fluctuate relative to the abundance of schooling pelagic fishes merits further investigation. Text Alaska Lontra HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 15 5 705 714
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic PublishAheadOfPrint
spellingShingle PublishAheadOfPrint
Blundell, Gail M.
Ben-David, Merav
Groves, Pamela
Bowyer, R. Terry
Geffen, Eli
Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
topic_facet PublishAheadOfPrint
description Previous studies of coastal river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) in Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA, documented atypical social organization for mammals. Social groups were composed largely of males, but some males remained solitary year-round and most females were asocial. Because, in carnivores, groups are usually composed of highly related individuals but group living also provides advantages unrelated to kinship, we concurrently evaluated the role of relatedness and ecological benefits in sociality among coastal river otters. By using DNA microsatellite analysis and radiotelemetry, we were able to reject the hypothesis that social groups of otters were kin based. In addition, we found no indication of kin avoidance, as would be expected from low dispersal and high local competition. Sociality conferred no reproductive benefits or costs to otters; number of offspring and number of relatives in the population did not differ between social and solitary animals. Solitary males were not older or larger than were social males, and there was no relation between male size and number of offspring, indicating that sexual selection did not mask a potential relation between sociality and reproductive success. Among coastal river otters in this region, sociality could be explained by the benefits obtained from cooperative foraging on high-quality schooling pelagic fishes. Such benefits did not require association with kin, resulting in no selection pressure for kin-based groups. The prediction that the degree of sociality in the population will fluctuate relative to the abundance of schooling pelagic fishes merits further investigation.
format Text
author Blundell, Gail M.
Ben-David, Merav
Groves, Pamela
Bowyer, R. Terry
Geffen, Eli
author_facet Blundell, Gail M.
Ben-David, Merav
Groves, Pamela
Bowyer, R. Terry
Geffen, Eli
author_sort Blundell, Gail M.
title Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
title_short Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
title_full Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
title_fullStr Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
title_full_unstemmed Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
title_sort kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2004
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arh110v1
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110
genre Alaska
Lontra
genre_facet Alaska
Lontra
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/arh110v1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110
op_rights Copyright (C) 2004, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh110
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 15
container_issue 5
container_start_page 705
op_container_end_page 714
_version_ 1766242401331970048