Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?

If the fitness benefits gained from producing male and female offspring differ due to parental or environmental conditions, parents should adjust their level of investment accordingly. We studied sex allocation and reproductive investment in a population of common guillemots ( Uria aalge ) in 2 bree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Kristensen, Ditte Lyngbo, Erikstad, Kjell Einar, Reiertsen, Tone Kristin, Moum, Truls, Barrett, Robert T., Jenni-Eiermann, Susanne
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/1/136
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:24/1/136
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:24/1/136 2023-05-15T15:56:01+02:00 Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise? Kristensen, Ditte Lyngbo Erikstad, Kjell Einar Reiertsen, Tone Kristin Moum, Truls Barrett, Robert T. Jenni-Eiermann, Susanne 2013-01-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/1/136 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/1/136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144 Copyright (C) 2013, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Research Article TEXT 2013 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144 2015-02-28T18:07:29Z If the fitness benefits gained from producing male and female offspring differ due to parental or environmental conditions, parents should adjust their level of investment accordingly. We studied sex allocation and reproductive investment in a population of common guillemots ( Uria aalge ) in 2 breeding seasons. The common guillemot is a single-egg species and the male is only slightly larger than the female implying small, if any differential costs of raising male and female offspring. We use 4 variables to characterize reproductive allocation: 1) sex of the chick at hatching, 2) adult male and female body condition, 3) baseline corticosterone (CORT) level of adults early and late in the chick-rearing period, and 4) body mass of the chicks just prior to fledging. Females that produced female offspring were in better body condition during early chick-rearing than those producing males and both parents raising a female offspring lost more body mass during the chick-rearing period. Female offspring were heavier than male offspring at the end of the chick-rearing period. Whereas hatching sex ratio was at unity in one of the years, it was strongly skewed toward females (72.5%) in the other year, and this pattern was consistent for a subset of pairs studied in both years. Early baseline CORT levels of adults were lower in the year when the sex ratio was skewed toward female offspring. We discuss this unexpected pattern of sex allocation in relation to variation in feeding conditions and the role of females in competing for good nesting sites. Text common guillemot Uria aalge uria HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 24 1 136 143
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
Kristensen, Ditte Lyngbo
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Reiertsen, Tone Kristin
Moum, Truls
Barrett, Robert T.
Jenni-Eiermann, Susanne
Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
topic_facet Research Article
description If the fitness benefits gained from producing male and female offspring differ due to parental or environmental conditions, parents should adjust their level of investment accordingly. We studied sex allocation and reproductive investment in a population of common guillemots ( Uria aalge ) in 2 breeding seasons. The common guillemot is a single-egg species and the male is only slightly larger than the female implying small, if any differential costs of raising male and female offspring. We use 4 variables to characterize reproductive allocation: 1) sex of the chick at hatching, 2) adult male and female body condition, 3) baseline corticosterone (CORT) level of adults early and late in the chick-rearing period, and 4) body mass of the chicks just prior to fledging. Females that produced female offspring were in better body condition during early chick-rearing than those producing males and both parents raising a female offspring lost more body mass during the chick-rearing period. Female offspring were heavier than male offspring at the end of the chick-rearing period. Whereas hatching sex ratio was at unity in one of the years, it was strongly skewed toward females (72.5%) in the other year, and this pattern was consistent for a subset of pairs studied in both years. Early baseline CORT levels of adults were lower in the year when the sex ratio was skewed toward female offspring. We discuss this unexpected pattern of sex allocation in relation to variation in feeding conditions and the role of females in competing for good nesting sites.
format Text
author Kristensen, Ditte Lyngbo
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Reiertsen, Tone Kristin
Moum, Truls
Barrett, Robert T.
Jenni-Eiermann, Susanne
author_facet Kristensen, Ditte Lyngbo
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Reiertsen, Tone Kristin
Moum, Truls
Barrett, Robert T.
Jenni-Eiermann, Susanne
author_sort Kristensen, Ditte Lyngbo
title Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
title_short Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
title_full Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
title_fullStr Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
title_full_unstemmed Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
title_sort are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2013
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/1/136
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144
genre common guillemot
Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet common guillemot
Uria aalge
uria
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/1/136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144
op_rights Copyright (C) 2013, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars144
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 136
op_container_end_page 143
_version_ 1766391491441197056