Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds

Foraging rate and the distribution of foragers depend on prey distribution in conjunction with interindividual interactions. Generalized functional response models predict intake rates and spatial distributions of foragers on the basis of resource distribution and interference competition. The adequ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Bijleveld, Allert Imre, Folmer, Eelke Olov, Piersma, Theunis
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/4/806
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:23/4/806
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:23/4/806 2023-05-15T15:48:27+02:00 Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds Bijleveld, Allert Imre Folmer, Eelke Olov Piersma, Theunis 2012-07-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/4/806 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/4/806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034 Copyright (C) 2012, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Original Article TEXT 2012 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034 2015-02-28T18:00:03Z Foraging rate and the distribution of foragers depend on prey distribution in conjunction with interindividual interactions. Generalized functional response models predict intake rates and spatial distributions of foragers on the basis of resource distribution and interference competition. The adequacy of these models depends on how well they capture the foragers' essential behavior. In this paper, we report on the results of a foraging experiment designed to examine the mechanisms of interference competition using red knots Calidris canutus that feed on buried bivalves. Red knots are rarely observed to interfere in the field, but this does not imply absence of interference. Our experimental setup minimized resource depletion, which allowed us to quantify interference competition as the decline in intake rate as a function of group size, with prey density and social status as additional treatments. We found that intake rate and searching efficiency decreased with group size and that dominant birds had higher intake rates than subordinates. Additionally, time spent searching for prey increased with group size. The decrease in intake rate was not due to conventional interference mechanisms (such as kleptoparasitism and time spent interacting with conspecifics) but to “cryptic interference,” that is, avoidance of physical encounters with conspecifics. To accurately predict intake rates and foraging distributions, theory and models need to account for the possibility that animals anticipate and try to avoid, at some costs, physical encounters with conspecifics (i.e., conflicts that would make conventional interference behavior visible). Text Calidris canutus HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 23 4 806 814
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Original Article
spellingShingle Original Article
Bijleveld, Allert Imre
Folmer, Eelke Olov
Piersma, Theunis
Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
topic_facet Original Article
description Foraging rate and the distribution of foragers depend on prey distribution in conjunction with interindividual interactions. Generalized functional response models predict intake rates and spatial distributions of foragers on the basis of resource distribution and interference competition. The adequacy of these models depends on how well they capture the foragers' essential behavior. In this paper, we report on the results of a foraging experiment designed to examine the mechanisms of interference competition using red knots Calidris canutus that feed on buried bivalves. Red knots are rarely observed to interfere in the field, but this does not imply absence of interference. Our experimental setup minimized resource depletion, which allowed us to quantify interference competition as the decline in intake rate as a function of group size, with prey density and social status as additional treatments. We found that intake rate and searching efficiency decreased with group size and that dominant birds had higher intake rates than subordinates. Additionally, time spent searching for prey increased with group size. The decrease in intake rate was not due to conventional interference mechanisms (such as kleptoparasitism and time spent interacting with conspecifics) but to “cryptic interference,” that is, avoidance of physical encounters with conspecifics. To accurately predict intake rates and foraging distributions, theory and models need to account for the possibility that animals anticipate and try to avoid, at some costs, physical encounters with conspecifics (i.e., conflicts that would make conventional interference behavior visible).
format Text
author Bijleveld, Allert Imre
Folmer, Eelke Olov
Piersma, Theunis
author_facet Bijleveld, Allert Imre
Folmer, Eelke Olov
Piersma, Theunis
author_sort Bijleveld, Allert Imre
title Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
title_short Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
title_full Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
title_fullStr Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
title_full_unstemmed Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
title_sort experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2012
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/4/806
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034
genre Calidris canutus
genre_facet Calidris canutus
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/4/806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034
op_rights Copyright (C) 2012, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars034
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 23
container_issue 4
container_start_page 806
op_container_end_page 814
_version_ 1766383428692869120