Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator

To quantify the pattern of allocation of foraging activity of a sit-and-wait forager among feeding sites of different profitability, I conducted an experimental study of patch utilization behavior of Ural owls ( Strix uralensis ) in an experimental flight cage. The owls were allowed to search among...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Author: Nishimura, Kinya
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/99
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:2/2/99
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:2/2/99 2023-05-15T18:27:33+02:00 Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator Nishimura, Kinya 1991-01-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/99 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/99 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99 Copyright (C) 1991, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Articles TEXT 1991 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99 2007-06-23T18:24:11Z To quantify the pattern of allocation of foraging activity of a sit-and-wait forager among feeding sites of different profitability, I conducted an experimental study of patch utilization behavior of Ural owls ( Strix uralensis ) in an experimental flight cage. The owls were allowed to search among four patches containing equal numbers of mice, two with the large Japanese field mouse ( Apodemus speciosus ) and two with the small Japanese field mouse ( A. argenteus ). Patches with A. speciosus were more profitable than those with A. argenteus , and owls visited more profitable patches more frequently. Visiting frequency to richer patches did not increase with experience; however, owls changed search time according to experience. Search time in a patch became longer in later visits than in earlier visits during a given night according to an owl’s sampling experience among patches. Furthermore, owls stayed longer in richer patches than in poor ones if they had caught mice in both types of patches. Search time had great variance. Mean search time that ended with attack was longer than that ended without attack (give up). In effect, Ural owls improved their resource utilization pattern as they accumulated experience in the environment. [ Behav Ecol 1991;2:99–105J ] Text Strix uralensis Ural Owl HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 2 2 99 105
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Nishimura, Kinya
Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
topic_facet Articles
description To quantify the pattern of allocation of foraging activity of a sit-and-wait forager among feeding sites of different profitability, I conducted an experimental study of patch utilization behavior of Ural owls ( Strix uralensis ) in an experimental flight cage. The owls were allowed to search among four patches containing equal numbers of mice, two with the large Japanese field mouse ( Apodemus speciosus ) and two with the small Japanese field mouse ( A. argenteus ). Patches with A. speciosus were more profitable than those with A. argenteus , and owls visited more profitable patches more frequently. Visiting frequency to richer patches did not increase with experience; however, owls changed search time according to experience. Search time in a patch became longer in later visits than in earlier visits during a given night according to an owl’s sampling experience among patches. Furthermore, owls stayed longer in richer patches than in poor ones if they had caught mice in both types of patches. Search time had great variance. Mean search time that ended with attack was longer than that ended without attack (give up). In effect, Ural owls improved their resource utilization pattern as they accumulated experience in the environment. [ Behav Ecol 1991;2:99–105J ]
format Text
author Nishimura, Kinya
author_facet Nishimura, Kinya
author_sort Nishimura, Kinya
title Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
title_short Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
title_full Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
title_fullStr Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of different prey type patches in the Ural owl(Strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
title_sort utilization of different prey type patches in the ural owl(strix uralensis): a sit-and-wait predator
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 1991
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/99
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99
genre Strix uralensis
Ural Owl
genre_facet Strix uralensis
Ural Owl
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/99
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99
op_rights Copyright (C) 1991, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/2.2.99
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 2
container_issue 2
container_start_page 99
op_container_end_page 105
_version_ 1766209684553859072