What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?

Vigilance has been predicted to decrease with group size due to increased predator detection and dilution of predation risk in larger groups. Although earlier literature reviews have provided ample support for this prediction, an increasing number of studies have failed to document a decline in vigi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Author: Beauchamp, Guy
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/6/1361
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:19/6/1361
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:19/6/1361 2023-05-15T15:34:41+02:00 What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? Beauchamp, Guy 2008-11-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/6/1361 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/6/1361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096 Copyright (C) 2008, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Review TEXT 2008 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096 2016-11-16T17:03:34Z Vigilance has been predicted to decrease with group size due to increased predator detection and dilution of predation risk in larger groups. Although earlier literature reviews have provided ample support for this prediction, an increasing number of studies have failed to document a decline in vigilance with group size. In addition, support for this prediction has been based thus far on the P value of the relationship between vigilance and group size rather than on a quantitative assessment of effect magnitude. Here, I use a meta-analysis of empirical relationships between vigilance and group size in birds published in the last 35 years to provide a reassessment of the group-size effect on vigilance. Nearly one-third of all published relationships between vigilance and group size were not significant ( n = 172). Results from the meta-analysis indicate weak to moderate negative correlations between group size and time spent vigilant ( n = 43), scan frequency ( n = 29), or scan duration ( n = 20). The magnitude of the relationship was stronger in studies that controlled the amount of food available to birds. A funnel plot of the relationship between correlation coefficients and sample size failed to reveal an obvious publication bias. Although the meta-analysis results generally support the prediction that vigilance should decline with group size, a large amount of variation in vigilance remains unexplained in avian studies. Text Avian Studies HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 19 6 1361 1368
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Review
spellingShingle Review
Beauchamp, Guy
What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
topic_facet Review
description Vigilance has been predicted to decrease with group size due to increased predator detection and dilution of predation risk in larger groups. Although earlier literature reviews have provided ample support for this prediction, an increasing number of studies have failed to document a decline in vigilance with group size. In addition, support for this prediction has been based thus far on the P value of the relationship between vigilance and group size rather than on a quantitative assessment of effect magnitude. Here, I use a meta-analysis of empirical relationships between vigilance and group size in birds published in the last 35 years to provide a reassessment of the group-size effect on vigilance. Nearly one-third of all published relationships between vigilance and group size were not significant ( n = 172). Results from the meta-analysis indicate weak to moderate negative correlations between group size and time spent vigilant ( n = 43), scan frequency ( n = 29), or scan duration ( n = 20). The magnitude of the relationship was stronger in studies that controlled the amount of food available to birds. A funnel plot of the relationship between correlation coefficients and sample size failed to reveal an obvious publication bias. Although the meta-analysis results generally support the prediction that vigilance should decline with group size, a large amount of variation in vigilance remains unexplained in avian studies.
format Text
author Beauchamp, Guy
author_facet Beauchamp, Guy
author_sort Beauchamp, Guy
title What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
title_short What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
title_full What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
title_fullStr What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
title_full_unstemmed What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
title_sort what is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2008
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/6/1361
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096
genre Avian Studies
genre_facet Avian Studies
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/6/1361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096
op_rights Copyright (C) 2008, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn096
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 19
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1361
op_container_end_page 1368
_version_ 1766364992570916864