Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers

Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual's presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Authors: Rosell, Frank, Sanda, JørnIngar
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/6/897
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:17/6/897
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:17/6/897 2023-05-15T15:50:47+02:00 Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers Rosell, Frank Sanda, JørnIngar 2006-11-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/6/897 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/6/897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022 Copyright (C) 2006, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Articles TEXT 2006 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022 2016-11-16T17:08:24Z Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual's presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusion by conspecific adult male Eurasian beavers ( Castor fiber ) either in the localized presence or in the absence of odor of a predator to test the hypothesis that the territorial defense of free-living beavers would be disrupted by the presence of predation risk in their natural environment. We predicted that beavers would significantly reduce their willingness to countermark intruder's scent in the presence of the scent of predators (wolf [ Canis lupus ] and lynx [ Lynx lynx ]), compared with a control (no odor), as responses are in general stronger to predator scent marks than nonpredator scent. Therefore, we also predicted that the effects of nonpredatory mammal scent (neophobic control) (eland [ Taurotragus oryx ] and horse [ Equus cabalus ]) are to be expected somewhere in between the effects of the predator odor and a control. Our results suggest that both predator and nonpredator scents reduce beavers response to a simulated intruder's scent mounds and therefore disrupt their territorial defense. However, predator scent had a stronger effect than nonpredator scent. Beavers may therefore be at great risk on territories with predators present because of the trade-off between predator avoidance and territorial defense. Our study demonstrates the potential of predation risk as a powerful agent of counterselection on olfactory signaling behavior. Text Canis lupus Lynx Lynx lynx lynx HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 17 6 897 904
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Rosell, Frank
Sanda, JørnIngar
Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
topic_facet Articles
description Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual's presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusion by conspecific adult male Eurasian beavers ( Castor fiber ) either in the localized presence or in the absence of odor of a predator to test the hypothesis that the territorial defense of free-living beavers would be disrupted by the presence of predation risk in their natural environment. We predicted that beavers would significantly reduce their willingness to countermark intruder's scent in the presence of the scent of predators (wolf [ Canis lupus ] and lynx [ Lynx lynx ]), compared with a control (no odor), as responses are in general stronger to predator scent marks than nonpredator scent. Therefore, we also predicted that the effects of nonpredatory mammal scent (neophobic control) (eland [ Taurotragus oryx ] and horse [ Equus cabalus ]) are to be expected somewhere in between the effects of the predator odor and a control. Our results suggest that both predator and nonpredator scents reduce beavers response to a simulated intruder's scent mounds and therefore disrupt their territorial defense. However, predator scent had a stronger effect than nonpredator scent. Beavers may therefore be at great risk on territories with predators present because of the trade-off between predator avoidance and territorial defense. Our study demonstrates the potential of predation risk as a powerful agent of counterselection on olfactory signaling behavior.
format Text
author Rosell, Frank
Sanda, JørnIngar
author_facet Rosell, Frank
Sanda, JørnIngar
author_sort Rosell, Frank
title Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_short Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_full Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_fullStr Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_full_unstemmed Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_sort potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2006
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/6/897
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
genre Canis lupus
Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
genre_facet Canis lupus
Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/17/6/897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
op_rights Copyright (C) 2006, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 17
container_issue 6
container_start_page 897
op_container_end_page 904
_version_ 1766385804175736832