Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?

I staged replicate encounters between unrestrained lizards and snakes in outdoor enclosures to examine size-dependent predation within the common garden skink ( Lampropholis guichenoti ). Yellow-faced whip snakes ( Demansia psammophis ) forage widely for active prey and most often consumed large ski...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral Ecology
Main Author: Downes, Sharon J.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/13/4/551
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:13/4/551
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:beheco:13/4/551 2023-05-15T13:47:49+02:00 Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability? Downes, Sharon J. 2002-07-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/13/4/551 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551 en eng Oxford University Press http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/13/4/551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551 Copyright (C) 2002, International Society for Behavioral Ecology Articles TEXT 2002 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551 2016-11-16T17:26:09Z I staged replicate encounters between unrestrained lizards and snakes in outdoor enclosures to examine size-dependent predation within the common garden skink ( Lampropholis guichenoti ). Yellow-faced whip snakes ( Demansia psammophis ) forage widely for active prey and most often consumed large skinks, whereas death adders ( Acanthophis antarcticus ) ambush active prey and most often consumed small skinks. Small-eyed snakes ( Rhinoplocephalus nigrescens ) forage widely for inactive prey and consumed both small and large skinks equally often. Differential predation may reflect active choice by the predator, differential prey vulnerability, or both. To test for active choice, I presented foraging snakes with an inert small lizard versus an inert large lizard. They did not actively select lizards of a particular body size. To test for differential prey vulnerability, I quantified variation between small and large lizards in behavior that is important for determining the outcome of predator—prey interactions. Snakes did not differentiate between integumentary chemicals from small and large lizards. Large lizards tend to flee from approaching predators, thereby eliciting attack by the visually oriented whip snakes. Small lizards were more mobile than large lizards and therefore more likely to pass by sedentary death adders. Additionally, small skinks were more effectively lured by this sit-and-wait species and less likely to avoid its first capture attempt. In contrast, overnight retreat site selection (not body size) determined a lizard's chances of being detected by small-eyed snakes. Patterns of size-dependent predation by elapid snakes may arise not because of active choice but as a function of species-specific predator tactics and prey behavior. Text Antarc* antarcticus HighWire Press (Stanford University) Behavioral Ecology 13 4 551 560
institution Open Polar
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
op_collection_id fthighwire
language English
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Downes, Sharon J.
Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
topic_facet Articles
description I staged replicate encounters between unrestrained lizards and snakes in outdoor enclosures to examine size-dependent predation within the common garden skink ( Lampropholis guichenoti ). Yellow-faced whip snakes ( Demansia psammophis ) forage widely for active prey and most often consumed large skinks, whereas death adders ( Acanthophis antarcticus ) ambush active prey and most often consumed small skinks. Small-eyed snakes ( Rhinoplocephalus nigrescens ) forage widely for inactive prey and consumed both small and large skinks equally often. Differential predation may reflect active choice by the predator, differential prey vulnerability, or both. To test for active choice, I presented foraging snakes with an inert small lizard versus an inert large lizard. They did not actively select lizards of a particular body size. To test for differential prey vulnerability, I quantified variation between small and large lizards in behavior that is important for determining the outcome of predator—prey interactions. Snakes did not differentiate between integumentary chemicals from small and large lizards. Large lizards tend to flee from approaching predators, thereby eliciting attack by the visually oriented whip snakes. Small lizards were more mobile than large lizards and therefore more likely to pass by sedentary death adders. Additionally, small skinks were more effectively lured by this sit-and-wait species and less likely to avoid its first capture attempt. In contrast, overnight retreat site selection (not body size) determined a lizard's chances of being detected by small-eyed snakes. Patterns of size-dependent predation by elapid snakes may arise not because of active choice but as a function of species-specific predator tactics and prey behavior.
format Text
author Downes, Sharon J.
author_facet Downes, Sharon J.
author_sort Downes, Sharon J.
title Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
title_short Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
title_full Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
title_fullStr Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
title_full_unstemmed Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
title_sort size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2002
url http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/13/4/551
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551
genre Antarc*
antarcticus
genre_facet Antarc*
antarcticus
op_relation http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/13/4/551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551
op_rights Copyright (C) 2002, International Society for Behavioral Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.551
container_title Behavioral Ecology
container_volume 13
container_issue 4
container_start_page 551
op_container_end_page 560
_version_ 1766247910859603968