The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable

‘The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable’ summarizes issues regarding intellectual property rights and immaterial culture through a nuanced reading of how First Nations Peoples worldwide have been forced by forms of neoliberal-capitalist exploitation of the knowledge commons to ring-fence and/or commo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David S. Jones, Gavin Keeney
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75
id fthcommons:oai:hcommons.org/hc:51361
record_format openpolar
spelling fthcommons:oai:hcommons.org/hc:51361 2024-06-23T07:52:52+00:00 The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable David S. Jones Gavin Keeney 2023 https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75 English eng Springer Science and Business Media LLC https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75 846425:Capitalism:Topic 832668:Biopolitics:Topic 975774:Intellectual property:Topic 902116:Economics:Topic 2023 fthcommons https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75 2024-06-11T00:33:10Z ‘The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable’ summarizes issues regarding intellectual property rights and immaterial culture through a nuanced reading of how First Nations Peoples worldwide have been forced by forms of neoliberal-capitalist exploitation of the knowledge commons to ring-fence and/or commodify their lived traditions, in many cases dating back 100,000 years and clearly predating any and all Western (First World) concepts of ownership. The intention of the structuralist-inspired reading of this enforced defensive position is to emphasize and clarify issues concerning prior art and moral rights, two of the most ambiguous and gamed elements of copyright and patent law. Drawing upon the international context of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) and the Convention for Safeguarding Intangible Heritage (2003), this essay will focus, in part, on the travails of Aboriginals in Australia as representative of First Peoples worldwide and their long-exploited and long-expropriated traditions, inclusive of land, but foremost lived knowledge, but also their often compromised position vis-à-vis various Australian state and Commonwealth legislation concerning recognition of their copyright, moral rights, and intellectual property rights. In this complex dance between tradition, heritage, and law, the so-called public domain often also becomes a de facto warehouse for the eventual conversion of intangible rights to collectively held and stored cultural property, which is then leveraged and/or converted to cultural capital by both public institutions and private companies. The primary premise of the analytic to be applied is that commodification of knowledge is more or less co-equal to the digitization of culture and the regimes of expropriation and/or outright theft associated with platform cultures. Other/Unknown Material First Nations Humanities Commons CORE Deposits
institution Open Polar
collection Humanities Commons CORE Deposits
op_collection_id fthcommons
language English
topic 846425:Capitalism:Topic
832668:Biopolitics:Topic
975774:Intellectual property:Topic
902116:Economics:Topic
spellingShingle 846425:Capitalism:Topic
832668:Biopolitics:Topic
975774:Intellectual property:Topic
902116:Economics:Topic
David S. Jones
Gavin Keeney
The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable
topic_facet 846425:Capitalism:Topic
832668:Biopolitics:Topic
975774:Intellectual property:Topic
902116:Economics:Topic
description ‘The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable’ summarizes issues regarding intellectual property rights and immaterial culture through a nuanced reading of how First Nations Peoples worldwide have been forced by forms of neoliberal-capitalist exploitation of the knowledge commons to ring-fence and/or commodify their lived traditions, in many cases dating back 100,000 years and clearly predating any and all Western (First World) concepts of ownership. The intention of the structuralist-inspired reading of this enforced defensive position is to emphasize and clarify issues concerning prior art and moral rights, two of the most ambiguous and gamed elements of copyright and patent law. Drawing upon the international context of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) and the Convention for Safeguarding Intangible Heritage (2003), this essay will focus, in part, on the travails of Aboriginals in Australia as representative of First Peoples worldwide and their long-exploited and long-expropriated traditions, inclusive of land, but foremost lived knowledge, but also their often compromised position vis-à-vis various Australian state and Commonwealth legislation concerning recognition of their copyright, moral rights, and intellectual property rights. In this complex dance between tradition, heritage, and law, the so-called public domain often also becomes a de facto warehouse for the eventual conversion of intangible rights to collectively held and stored cultural property, which is then leveraged and/or converted to cultural capital by both public institutions and private companies. The primary premise of the analytic to be applied is that commodification of knowledge is more or less co-equal to the digitization of culture and the regimes of expropriation and/or outright theft associated with platform cultures.
author David S. Jones
Gavin Keeney
author_facet David S. Jones
Gavin Keeney
author_sort David S. Jones
title The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable
title_short The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable
title_full The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable
title_fullStr The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable
title_full_unstemmed The Debauched Commons: A Dark Parable
title_sort debauched commons: a dark parable
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17613/sdm3-vs75
_version_ 1802644285989847040