Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods

Microseismic monitoring is an important tool to characterize the reservoirs and delineate the growth of small-scale fractures. In addition, microseismic events are crucial for describing detailed fault geometries, stress changes, and spatial-temporal evolution of seismogenic activities. Deep learnin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, L., Peng, L., Zeng, X., Shi, P.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021593
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5021593
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5021593 2023-07-30T04:04:26+02:00 Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods Li, L. Peng, L. Zeng, X. Shi, P. 2023-07-11 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021593 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-4154 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021593 XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2023 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4154 2023-07-09T23:40:20Z Microseismic monitoring is an important tool to characterize the reservoirs and delineate the growth of small-scale fractures. In addition, microseismic events are crucial for describing detailed fault geometries, stress changes, and spatial-temporal evolution of seismogenic activities. Deep learning has been extensively and successfully utilized for seismic event detection and phase picking. In this work, we propose an integrated workflow of waveform denoising, event detection, and seismic phase detection based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and unsupervised clustering, aiming at identifying and classifying microseismic P- and S-wave arrivals accurately. First, we preprocess (e.g., bandpass filter) the continuous waveforms and extract statistical features, and then feed the features into CNN for deep feature extraction and learning. The microseismic phase detection is then performed using clustering from waveform feature distance (similarity), which is retrieved from both statistical features of waveforms and the deep features extracted by CNN, yielding microseismic P- and S-wave arrival detections. We use synthetic data with different source mechanisms and signal-to-noise ratios, along with field microseismic data collected from the Hengill Geothermal area in Iceland, to verify the effectiveness of the proposed workflow in detecting weak microseismic phases. The refined phase detections also improved the resolution of stacking-based source imaging. Conference Object Iceland GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam) Hengill ENVELOPE(-21.306,-21.306,64.078,64.078)
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description Microseismic monitoring is an important tool to characterize the reservoirs and delineate the growth of small-scale fractures. In addition, microseismic events are crucial for describing detailed fault geometries, stress changes, and spatial-temporal evolution of seismogenic activities. Deep learning has been extensively and successfully utilized for seismic event detection and phase picking. In this work, we propose an integrated workflow of waveform denoising, event detection, and seismic phase detection based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and unsupervised clustering, aiming at identifying and classifying microseismic P- and S-wave arrivals accurately. First, we preprocess (e.g., bandpass filter) the continuous waveforms and extract statistical features, and then feed the features into CNN for deep feature extraction and learning. The microseismic phase detection is then performed using clustering from waveform feature distance (similarity), which is retrieved from both statistical features of waveforms and the deep features extracted by CNN, yielding microseismic P- and S-wave arrival detections. We use synthetic data with different source mechanisms and signal-to-noise ratios, along with field microseismic data collected from the Hengill Geothermal area in Iceland, to verify the effectiveness of the proposed workflow in detecting weak microseismic phases. The refined phase detections also improved the resolution of stacking-based source imaging.
format Conference Object
author Li, L.
Peng, L.
Zeng, X.
Shi, P.
spellingShingle Li, L.
Peng, L.
Zeng, X.
Shi, P.
Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
author_facet Li, L.
Peng, L.
Zeng, X.
Shi, P.
author_sort Li, L.
title Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
title_short Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
title_full Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
title_fullStr Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
title_full_unstemmed Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
title_sort microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods
publishDate 2023
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021593
long_lat ENVELOPE(-21.306,-21.306,64.078,64.078)
geographic Hengill
geographic_facet Hengill
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-4154
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021593
op_doi https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4154
_version_ 1772815869289693184