Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning

Glaciers are important contributors to water resources in many parts of the world, as well as constituting potential hazards. Monitoring of glaciers with remote sensing data is complicated by the presence of supraglacial debris which limits the effectiveness of semi-automated glacier delineation tec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Racoviteanu, A., Miles, E., Davies, B., Bolch, T., Watson, S., Buri, P., Liu, Q., Mateo, E., Wilson, R., Robson, B., Schellenberger, T., Maslov, K., Persello, C., King, O.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021016
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5021016
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5021016 2023-07-30T04:03:36+02:00 Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning Racoviteanu, A. Miles, E. Davies, B. Bolch, T. Watson, S. Buri, P. Liu, Q. Mateo, E. Wilson, R. Robson, B. Schellenberger, T. Maslov, K. Persello, C. King, O. 2023-07-11 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021016 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-4606 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021016 XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2023 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4606 2023-07-16T23:40:25Z Glaciers are important contributors to water resources in many parts of the world, as well as constituting potential hazards. Monitoring of glaciers with remote sensing data is complicated by the presence of supraglacial debris which limits the effectiveness of semi-automated glacier delineation techniques. Furthermore, debris-covered glaciers are notoriously hard to survey in the field due to their complex, chaotic topography, and the presence of ephemeral ice cliffs and supraglacial lakes. As such, debris-covered glaciers are poorly represented in global inventories such as GLIMS and RGI, which consist of an assemblage of outlines from various dates. These inventories are subject to uncertainties due to mapping by multi-analysts using different methods. Despite recent efforts to map supraglacial debris cover at regional level, there remains an urgent need to develop a global, robust automated mapping approach based on open access data. Novel remote sensing data including high-resolution optical and radar data combined with emerging machine learning offer unique opportunities to advance current mapping methods. Here we evaluate current indices used in mapping supraglacial debris-cover and derive a best-practice workflow recommendation from particular combinations of these indices to derive glacier outlines for six representative subregions chosen globally: Khumbu and Manaslu regions (Nepal), Cordillera Blanca (Peru), Northern Patagonian Ice fields, Alaska Wrangell range, Hunza valley (Karakoram) and the Tien Shan. We present preliminary results of machine learning algorithms that combine the various remote sensing indices. The aim is to develop a robust, systematic method to map debris cover in a consistent manner at multi-temporal scales. Conference Object glacier glaciers Alaska GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam) Wrangell Range ENVELOPE(172.628,172.628,52.947,52.947)
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description Glaciers are important contributors to water resources in many parts of the world, as well as constituting potential hazards. Monitoring of glaciers with remote sensing data is complicated by the presence of supraglacial debris which limits the effectiveness of semi-automated glacier delineation techniques. Furthermore, debris-covered glaciers are notoriously hard to survey in the field due to their complex, chaotic topography, and the presence of ephemeral ice cliffs and supraglacial lakes. As such, debris-covered glaciers are poorly represented in global inventories such as GLIMS and RGI, which consist of an assemblage of outlines from various dates. These inventories are subject to uncertainties due to mapping by multi-analysts using different methods. Despite recent efforts to map supraglacial debris cover at regional level, there remains an urgent need to develop a global, robust automated mapping approach based on open access data. Novel remote sensing data including high-resolution optical and radar data combined with emerging machine learning offer unique opportunities to advance current mapping methods. Here we evaluate current indices used in mapping supraglacial debris-cover and derive a best-practice workflow recommendation from particular combinations of these indices to derive glacier outlines for six representative subregions chosen globally: Khumbu and Manaslu regions (Nepal), Cordillera Blanca (Peru), Northern Patagonian Ice fields, Alaska Wrangell range, Hunza valley (Karakoram) and the Tien Shan. We present preliminary results of machine learning algorithms that combine the various remote sensing indices. The aim is to develop a robust, systematic method to map debris cover in a consistent manner at multi-temporal scales.
format Conference Object
author Racoviteanu, A.
Miles, E.
Davies, B.
Bolch, T.
Watson, S.
Buri, P.
Liu, Q.
Mateo, E.
Wilson, R.
Robson, B.
Schellenberger, T.
Maslov, K.
Persello, C.
King, O.
spellingShingle Racoviteanu, A.
Miles, E.
Davies, B.
Bolch, T.
Watson, S.
Buri, P.
Liu, Q.
Mateo, E.
Wilson, R.
Robson, B.
Schellenberger, T.
Maslov, K.
Persello, C.
King, O.
Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
author_facet Racoviteanu, A.
Miles, E.
Davies, B.
Bolch, T.
Watson, S.
Buri, P.
Liu, Q.
Mateo, E.
Wilson, R.
Robson, B.
Schellenberger, T.
Maslov, K.
Persello, C.
King, O.
author_sort Racoviteanu, A.
title Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
title_short Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
title_full Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
title_fullStr Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
title_sort intercomparison of remotely sensed methods for delineation of high mountain debris-covered glaciers using machine learning
publishDate 2023
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021016
long_lat ENVELOPE(172.628,172.628,52.947,52.947)
geographic Wrangell Range
geographic_facet Wrangell Range
genre glacier
glaciers
Alaska
genre_facet glacier
glaciers
Alaska
op_source XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-4606
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021016
op_doi https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4606
_version_ 1772814627679240192