Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak
The February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak (CAO) featured historic cold and other winter hazards over a two-week period across the Central United States (US), leading to major socioeconomic impacts. Leading up to the event, model forecasts diverged on the evolution of critical features that...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Object |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019434 |
id |
ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5019434 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5019434 2023-07-16T03:57:04+02:00 Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak Furtado, J. Millin, O. 2023 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019434 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-3468 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019434 XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2023 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3468 2023-06-25T23:39:53Z The February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak (CAO) featured historic cold and other winter hazards over a two-week period across the Central United States (US), leading to major socioeconomic impacts. Leading up to the event, model forecasts diverged on the evolution of critical features that ultimately affected their forecast accuracy. In particular, the CAO event was preceded by two wave breaks at high latitudes -- one in the East Siberian Sea (2-4 February 2021) and another in the Labrador Sea (9-11 February 2021). In this talk, we illustrate how these wave breaks were important for the ultimate evolution and intensity of the CAO in subseasonal model forecasts. We use a combination of ERA5 and realtime forecasts from two models from the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project Database for the analysis: ECMWF and NCEP. We select model initialization dates with 2-3 weeks lead time to isolate ensemble members that simulated the wave breaks well and poorly and then evaluate their subsequent forecasts for the event. In both models, ensemble members that successfully simulated these wave-break features produce higher chances for widespread negative temperature anomalies across the Central US, corresponding to strong anomalous Arctic ridging, as seen in reanalysis. By contrast, ensemble members with either no or weak wave breaking forecast neutral to even positive temperature anomalies for the Central US over the target period, with less amplified flow. These results reinforce the need to simulate better blocking regimes in S2S operational models for improved accuracy of extreme winter weather events. Conference Object Arctic East Siberian Sea Labrador Sea GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam) Arctic East Siberian Sea ENVELOPE(166.000,166.000,74.000,74.000) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam) |
op_collection_id |
ftgfzpotsdam |
language |
English |
description |
The February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak (CAO) featured historic cold and other winter hazards over a two-week period across the Central United States (US), leading to major socioeconomic impacts. Leading up to the event, model forecasts diverged on the evolution of critical features that ultimately affected their forecast accuracy. In particular, the CAO event was preceded by two wave breaks at high latitudes -- one in the East Siberian Sea (2-4 February 2021) and another in the Labrador Sea (9-11 February 2021). In this talk, we illustrate how these wave breaks were important for the ultimate evolution and intensity of the CAO in subseasonal model forecasts. We use a combination of ERA5 and realtime forecasts from two models from the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project Database for the analysis: ECMWF and NCEP. We select model initialization dates with 2-3 weeks lead time to isolate ensemble members that simulated the wave breaks well and poorly and then evaluate their subsequent forecasts for the event. In both models, ensemble members that successfully simulated these wave-break features produce higher chances for widespread negative temperature anomalies across the Central US, corresponding to strong anomalous Arctic ridging, as seen in reanalysis. By contrast, ensemble members with either no or weak wave breaking forecast neutral to even positive temperature anomalies for the Central US over the target period, with less amplified flow. These results reinforce the need to simulate better blocking regimes in S2S operational models for improved accuracy of extreme winter weather events. |
format |
Conference Object |
author |
Furtado, J. Millin, O. |
spellingShingle |
Furtado, J. Millin, O. Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak |
author_facet |
Furtado, J. Millin, O. |
author_sort |
Furtado, J. |
title |
Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak |
title_short |
Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak |
title_full |
Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak |
title_fullStr |
Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of Tropospheric Wave Breaking for Subseasonal Forecasts of the February 2021 North American Cold Air Outbreak |
title_sort |
importance of tropospheric wave breaking for subseasonal forecasts of the february 2021 north american cold air outbreak |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019434 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(166.000,166.000,74.000,74.000) |
geographic |
Arctic East Siberian Sea |
geographic_facet |
Arctic East Siberian Sea |
genre |
Arctic East Siberian Sea Labrador Sea |
genre_facet |
Arctic East Siberian Sea Labrador Sea |
op_source |
XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-3468 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019434 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3468 |
_version_ |
1771543580764012544 |