PC index failures: Where is IAGA?

The polar cap (PC) indices are potentially very useful for monitoring solar wind-magnetosphere interactions and developments of global magnetic disturbances. However, the generation of PC indices have throughout years been haunted by methodical problems. These problems have generated invalid PC indi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stauning, P.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019090
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5019090
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5019090 2023-09-05T13:14:02+02:00 PC index failures: Where is IAGA? Stauning, P. 2023 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019090 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-2804 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019090 XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2023 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-2804 2023-08-13T23:41:24Z The polar cap (PC) indices are potentially very useful for monitoring solar wind-magnetosphere interactions and developments of global magnetic disturbances. However, the generation of PC indices have throughout years been haunted by methodical problems. These problems have generated invalid PC indices, which have been used in numerous (more than 48) peer-reviewed publications. Thus, the index version generated at the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) in 1991 and also applied at the Danish Space Research Institute (DTU-Space) have twice experienced typo-errors in the computer code and use, furthermore, confusing units in the regression calculations. The PC index version developed at the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) in 2006 and used until 2011 have applied IMF components in their GSE instead the correct GSM representation in the calculations of calibration parameters. The PCS indices supplied from AARI during 2013-21 were based on faulty baseline derivation, which have generated excessive unfounded daily variations. The methods presently applied at DTU-Space use reverse convection samples to define forward convection scaling parameters. The reference levels assumed quiet, acrually represent disturbed conditions. Rather than compensate for undesired daily variations, the reference level method generate unjustified diurnal excursions. The projection angle parameter is based on erroneous calculations. The planned contribution shall explain the methodical problems and demonstrate the documented consequences of the invalid indices. The question to be asked: Where is IAGA? References: Stauning (JGR 2013). The Polar Cap index: doi:10.1002/jgra.50462 Stauning (JGR 2021). Invalid Polar Cap (PC) indices: doi:10.1029/2020JA028292 Stauning (JGR 2022). Invalid Polar Cap South (PCS) indices: doi:10.1029/2022JA030355 Conference Object Antarc* Antarctic Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute Arctic GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam) Antarctic Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description The polar cap (PC) indices are potentially very useful for monitoring solar wind-magnetosphere interactions and developments of global magnetic disturbances. However, the generation of PC indices have throughout years been haunted by methodical problems. These problems have generated invalid PC indices, which have been used in numerous (more than 48) peer-reviewed publications. Thus, the index version generated at the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) in 1991 and also applied at the Danish Space Research Institute (DTU-Space) have twice experienced typo-errors in the computer code and use, furthermore, confusing units in the regression calculations. The PC index version developed at the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) in 2006 and used until 2011 have applied IMF components in their GSE instead the correct GSM representation in the calculations of calibration parameters. The PCS indices supplied from AARI during 2013-21 were based on faulty baseline derivation, which have generated excessive unfounded daily variations. The methods presently applied at DTU-Space use reverse convection samples to define forward convection scaling parameters. The reference levels assumed quiet, acrually represent disturbed conditions. Rather than compensate for undesired daily variations, the reference level method generate unjustified diurnal excursions. The projection angle parameter is based on erroneous calculations. The planned contribution shall explain the methodical problems and demonstrate the documented consequences of the invalid indices. The question to be asked: Where is IAGA? References: Stauning (JGR 2013). The Polar Cap index: doi:10.1002/jgra.50462 Stauning (JGR 2021). Invalid Polar Cap (PC) indices: doi:10.1029/2020JA028292 Stauning (JGR 2022). Invalid Polar Cap South (PCS) indices: doi:10.1029/2022JA030355
format Conference Object
author Stauning, P.
spellingShingle Stauning, P.
PC index failures: Where is IAGA?
author_facet Stauning, P.
author_sort Stauning, P.
title PC index failures: Where is IAGA?
title_short PC index failures: Where is IAGA?
title_full PC index failures: Where is IAGA?
title_fullStr PC index failures: Where is IAGA?
title_full_unstemmed PC index failures: Where is IAGA?
title_sort pc index failures: where is iaga?
publishDate 2023
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019090
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute
Arctic
op_source XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-2804
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019090
op_doi https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-2804
_version_ 1776205102350073856