Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification

Recent studies propose that Arctic sea ice loss and associated warming influence wave propagation into the stratosphere, affecting the winter polar vortex. Through stratosphere-troposphere coupling, this may perturb the winter jet stream and affect surface weather. But the “stratospheric pathway” li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mudhar, R., Geen, R., Lewis, N., Screen, J., Seviour, W., Thomson, S.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5018098
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5018098
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5018098 2023-10-29T02:33:23+01:00 Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification Mudhar, R. Geen, R. Lewis, N. Screen, J. Seviour, W. Thomson, S. 2023 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5018098 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-1511 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5018098 XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2023 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-1511 2023-10-01T23:43:19Z Recent studies propose that Arctic sea ice loss and associated warming influence wave propagation into the stratosphere, affecting the winter polar vortex. Through stratosphere-troposphere coupling, this may perturb the winter jet stream and affect surface weather. But the “stratospheric pathway” linking Arctic variability to midlatitude weather extremes is not well understood. For example, studies such as the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) have not found a robust stratospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss, in strength nor sign. Here, we use an idealised atmospheric modelling framework (Isca) to better understand mechanisms and uncertainties in the stratospheric polar vortex response to Arctic amplification. We use Newtonian relaxation of temperature to a specified equilibrium temperature to simulate northern hemisphere winter, and force the model with an adjustable polar heating. Consistent with previous work, the vortex weakens in response to the imposed heating. Notably, we find a dependency on heating depth; vortex variability and sudden warming frequency reduces with increasing depth. This is relevant to PAMIP given previous work suggesting that atmosphere-only GCMs likely underestimate the depth of sea ice loss-induced atmospheric warming compared to fully coupled ones, and that the Arctic amplification link to midlatitude weather is sensitive to the vertical extent of polar warming. As such, our results should help to improve understanding and reduce biases in such comprehensive models. Conference Object Arctic Sea ice GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description Recent studies propose that Arctic sea ice loss and associated warming influence wave propagation into the stratosphere, affecting the winter polar vortex. Through stratosphere-troposphere coupling, this may perturb the winter jet stream and affect surface weather. But the “stratospheric pathway” linking Arctic variability to midlatitude weather extremes is not well understood. For example, studies such as the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) have not found a robust stratospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss, in strength nor sign. Here, we use an idealised atmospheric modelling framework (Isca) to better understand mechanisms and uncertainties in the stratospheric polar vortex response to Arctic amplification. We use Newtonian relaxation of temperature to a specified equilibrium temperature to simulate northern hemisphere winter, and force the model with an adjustable polar heating. Consistent with previous work, the vortex weakens in response to the imposed heating. Notably, we find a dependency on heating depth; vortex variability and sudden warming frequency reduces with increasing depth. This is relevant to PAMIP given previous work suggesting that atmosphere-only GCMs likely underestimate the depth of sea ice loss-induced atmospheric warming compared to fully coupled ones, and that the Arctic amplification link to midlatitude weather is sensitive to the vertical extent of polar warming. As such, our results should help to improve understanding and reduce biases in such comprehensive models.
format Conference Object
author Mudhar, R.
Geen, R.
Lewis, N.
Screen, J.
Seviour, W.
Thomson, S.
spellingShingle Mudhar, R.
Geen, R.
Lewis, N.
Screen, J.
Seviour, W.
Thomson, S.
Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification
author_facet Mudhar, R.
Geen, R.
Lewis, N.
Screen, J.
Seviour, W.
Thomson, S.
author_sort Mudhar, R.
title Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification
title_short Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification
title_full Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification
title_fullStr Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the stratospheric response to Arctic amplification
title_sort understanding the stratospheric response to arctic amplification
publishDate 2023
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5018098
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-1511
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5018098
op_doi https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-1511
_version_ 1781055378416467968