Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?

Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) leads to remarkable stress changes in the subsurface which can be potentially released along favourably orientated pre-existing fault structures, a process nowadays termed glacially triggered faulting. A notable vertical shift of some meters can occur. In coastal a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steffen, H., Steffen, R.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5017854
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5017854
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5017854 2023-10-29T02:34:30+01:00 Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada? Steffen, H. Steffen, R. 2023 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5017854 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-1736 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5017854 XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2023 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-1736 2023-10-01T23:43:19Z Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) leads to remarkable stress changes in the subsurface which can be potentially released along favourably orientated pre-existing fault structures, a process nowadays termed glacially triggered faulting. A notable vertical shift of some meters can occur. In coastal areas this can affect the measured elevation of relative sea level markers. In such case these markers must be corrected before they can be used in palaeo-sea level investigations. Compared to Fennoscandia, the vast area of Canada does, so far, not contain any prominent traces of glacially triggered faulting which has led to interesting speculations in the literature. We will briefly review any suggested glacially induced faults in Canada and then analyze GIA-induced stress changes from a 3D finite element model of North America. We thereby test different stress regimes and (hypothetical) fault configurations to identify the most plausible fault parameters for reactivation. We will highlight the best parameter combinations for each fault or location of concern and compare them to available field observations. We will show that glacially triggered faulting has very likely affected most parts of Canada, including intraplate areas and Arctic islands. One example suggests that some relative sea level markers should be carefully used because faulting may have shifted the sample to a new elevation. Conference Object Arctic Fennoscandia GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) leads to remarkable stress changes in the subsurface which can be potentially released along favourably orientated pre-existing fault structures, a process nowadays termed glacially triggered faulting. A notable vertical shift of some meters can occur. In coastal areas this can affect the measured elevation of relative sea level markers. In such case these markers must be corrected before they can be used in palaeo-sea level investigations. Compared to Fennoscandia, the vast area of Canada does, so far, not contain any prominent traces of glacially triggered faulting which has led to interesting speculations in the literature. We will briefly review any suggested glacially induced faults in Canada and then analyze GIA-induced stress changes from a 3D finite element model of North America. We thereby test different stress regimes and (hypothetical) fault configurations to identify the most plausible fault parameters for reactivation. We will highlight the best parameter combinations for each fault or location of concern and compare them to available field observations. We will show that glacially triggered faulting has very likely affected most parts of Canada, including intraplate areas and Arctic islands. One example suggests that some relative sea level markers should be carefully used because faulting may have shifted the sample to a new elevation.
format Conference Object
author Steffen, H.
Steffen, R.
spellingShingle Steffen, H.
Steffen, R.
Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?
author_facet Steffen, H.
Steffen, R.
author_sort Steffen, H.
title Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?
title_short Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?
title_full Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?
title_fullStr Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?
title_full_unstemmed Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?
title_sort can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in canada?
publishDate 2023
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5017854
genre Arctic
Fennoscandia
genre_facet Arctic
Fennoscandia
op_source XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.57757/IUGG23-1736
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5017854
op_doi https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-1736
_version_ 1781057130692870144