Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard

Time-lapse monitoring of the subsurface using ambient seismic noise is a popular method in environmental seismology. We assess the reliability of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method for monitoring seasonal permafrost active layer variability in northwest Svalbard. We observe comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth Surface Dynamics
Main Authors: Köhler, A., Weidle, C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5004089
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5004089
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5004089 2023-05-15T13:02:46+02:00 Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard Earth Surface Dynamics Köhler, A. Weidle, C. 2019 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5004089 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5004089 Earth Surface Dynamics info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2019 ftgfzpotsdam https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019 2022-09-14T05:57:25Z Time-lapse monitoring of the subsurface using ambient seismic noise is a popular method in environmental seismology. We assess the reliability of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method for monitoring seasonal permafrost active layer variability in northwest Svalbard. We observe complex HVSR variability between 1 and 50 Hz in the record of a temporary seismic deployment covering frozen and thawed soil conditions between April and August 2016. While strong variations are due to changing noise conditions, mainly affected by wind speed and degrading coupling of instruments during melt season, a seasonal trend is observed at some stations that has most likely a subsurface structural cause. A HVSR peak emerges close to the Nyquist frequency (50 Hz) in beginning of June which is then gradually gliding down, reaching frequencies of about 15–25 Hz in the end of August. This observation is consistent with HVSR forward modeling for a set of structural models that simulate different stages of active layer thawing. Our results reveal a number of potential pitfalls when interpreting HVSRs and suggest a careful analysis of temporal variations since HVSR seasonality is not necessarily related to changes in the subsurface. In addition, we investigate if effects of changing noise sources on HVSRs can be avoided by utilizing a directional, narrowband (4.5 Hz) repeating seismic tremor which is observed at the permanent seismic broadband station in the study area. A significant change of the radial component HVSR shape during summer months is observed for all tremors. We show that a thawed active layer with very low seismic velocities would affect Rayleigh wave ellipticities in the tremor frequency band. We compile a list of recommendations for future experiments, including comments on network layouts suitable for array beamforming and waveform correlation methods that can provide essential information on noise source variability. Article in Journal/Newspaper Active layer monitoring permafrost Svalbard GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam) Svalbard Earth Surface Dynamics 7 1 1 16
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description Time-lapse monitoring of the subsurface using ambient seismic noise is a popular method in environmental seismology. We assess the reliability of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method for monitoring seasonal permafrost active layer variability in northwest Svalbard. We observe complex HVSR variability between 1 and 50 Hz in the record of a temporary seismic deployment covering frozen and thawed soil conditions between April and August 2016. While strong variations are due to changing noise conditions, mainly affected by wind speed and degrading coupling of instruments during melt season, a seasonal trend is observed at some stations that has most likely a subsurface structural cause. A HVSR peak emerges close to the Nyquist frequency (50 Hz) in beginning of June which is then gradually gliding down, reaching frequencies of about 15–25 Hz in the end of August. This observation is consistent with HVSR forward modeling for a set of structural models that simulate different stages of active layer thawing. Our results reveal a number of potential pitfalls when interpreting HVSRs and suggest a careful analysis of temporal variations since HVSR seasonality is not necessarily related to changes in the subsurface. In addition, we investigate if effects of changing noise sources on HVSRs can be avoided by utilizing a directional, narrowband (4.5 Hz) repeating seismic tremor which is observed at the permanent seismic broadband station in the study area. A significant change of the radial component HVSR shape during summer months is observed for all tremors. We show that a thawed active layer with very low seismic velocities would affect Rayleigh wave ellipticities in the tremor frequency band. We compile a list of recommendations for future experiments, including comments on network layouts suitable for array beamforming and waveform correlation methods that can provide essential information on noise source variability.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Köhler, A.
Weidle, C.
spellingShingle Köhler, A.
Weidle, C.
Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
author_facet Köhler, A.
Weidle, C.
author_sort Köhler, A.
title Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_short Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_full Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_fullStr Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_full_unstemmed Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_sort potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the hvsr method: a case study in svalbard
publishDate 2019
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5004089
geographic Svalbard
geographic_facet Svalbard
genre Active layer monitoring
permafrost
Svalbard
genre_facet Active layer monitoring
permafrost
Svalbard
op_source Earth Surface Dynamics
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5004089
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019
container_title Earth Surface Dynamics
container_volume 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 16
_version_ 1766320661044658176