Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions

Glacial-isotactic adjustment (GIA) is one of the key processes considering relative sea-level (RSL) and paleo-topography during the last glacial cycle. Especially in former ice-covered regions the subsidence of the solid Earth due to ice loads can reach more than 500 m and contributes to the stabili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bagge, M., Klemann, V., Steinberger, B., Thomas, M.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002453
id ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5002453
record_format openpolar
spelling ftgfzpotsdam:oai:gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de:item_5002453 2023-05-15T16:12:05+02:00 Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions Bagge, M. Klemann, V. Steinberger, B. Thomas, M. 2019 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002453 eng eng https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002453 Abstracts info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2019 ftgfzpotsdam 2022-09-14T05:57:25Z Glacial-isotactic adjustment (GIA) is one of the key processes considering relative sea-level (RSL) and paleo-topography during the last glacial cycle. Especially in former ice-covered regions the subsidence of the solid Earth due to ice loads can reach more than 500 m and contributes to the stability of ice-sheets (e.g. position of grounding line and ice-sheet elevation), whereas at the coasts of the world oceans the deformation is governed by global RSL fall of more than 100 m. Because the viscoelastic response of the solid Earth is governed by its viscosity structure, the effect of lateral viscosity variations on deformations due to GIA has to be estimated. The importance was already shown for the differences in earth structure below the glacial ice sheets of Fennoscandia and Laurentide, as well as for a number of peripheral and far-field regions. One open question arises: Can the 3D earth properly be parameterized by locally optimized 1D earth structures? In this study, we apply a 3D Earth structure which we derived from seismic tomography and further geodynamic constraints as an a priori estimation of the Earth viscosity distribution. Applying a standard glaciation history, we compare the response characteristics of 1D and 3D earth parameterizations and discuss the limits of optimized 1D earth parametrizations. We will focus on reconstructions of RSL during the last deglaciation in view of sea level index points which are generally used for validating the GIA process. Conference Object Fennoscandia Ice Sheet GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
institution Open Polar
collection GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)
op_collection_id ftgfzpotsdam
language English
description Glacial-isotactic adjustment (GIA) is one of the key processes considering relative sea-level (RSL) and paleo-topography during the last glacial cycle. Especially in former ice-covered regions the subsidence of the solid Earth due to ice loads can reach more than 500 m and contributes to the stability of ice-sheets (e.g. position of grounding line and ice-sheet elevation), whereas at the coasts of the world oceans the deformation is governed by global RSL fall of more than 100 m. Because the viscoelastic response of the solid Earth is governed by its viscosity structure, the effect of lateral viscosity variations on deformations due to GIA has to be estimated. The importance was already shown for the differences in earth structure below the glacial ice sheets of Fennoscandia and Laurentide, as well as for a number of peripheral and far-field regions. One open question arises: Can the 3D earth properly be parameterized by locally optimized 1D earth structures? In this study, we apply a 3D Earth structure which we derived from seismic tomography and further geodynamic constraints as an a priori estimation of the Earth viscosity distribution. Applying a standard glaciation history, we compare the response characteristics of 1D and 3D earth parameterizations and discuss the limits of optimized 1D earth parametrizations. We will focus on reconstructions of RSL during the last deglaciation in view of sea level index points which are generally used for validating the GIA process.
format Conference Object
author Bagge, M.
Klemann, V.
Steinberger, B.
Thomas, M.
spellingShingle Bagge, M.
Klemann, V.
Steinberger, B.
Thomas, M.
Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
author_facet Bagge, M.
Klemann, V.
Steinberger, B.
Thomas, M.
author_sort Bagge, M.
title Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
title_short Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
title_full Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
title_fullStr Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed Impact of 3D Earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
title_sort impact of 3d earth structure on relative sea-level reconstructions
publishDate 2019
url https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002453
genre Fennoscandia
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Fennoscandia
Ice Sheet
op_source Abstracts
op_relation https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002453
_version_ 1765997317152833536