Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses

Due to their increasing spatial resolution, numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and the associated analyses resolve a growing fraction of the gravity wave (GW) spectrum. However, it is unclear how well this “resolved” part of the spectrum truly compares to the actual atmospheric variability. I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Podglajen, Aurelien, Hertzog, Albert, Plougonven, Riwal, Legras, Bernard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: EGU 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885398
https://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22FZJ-2020-03795%22
id ftfzjuelichnvdb:oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:885398
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfzjuelichnvdb:oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:885398 2024-09-15T17:48:09+00:00 Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses Podglajen, Aurelien Hertzog, Albert Plougonven, Riwal Legras, Bernard DE 2020 https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885398 https://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22FZJ-2020-03795%22 eng eng EGU info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2128/25863 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000562089000001 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1680-7316 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1680-7324 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-20-9331-2020 https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885398 https://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22FZJ-2020-03795%22 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atmospheric chemistry and physics 20(15), 9331 - 9350 (2020). doi:10.5194/acp-20-9331-2020 info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2020 ftfzjuelichnvdb https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9331-2020 2024-08-05T23:55:46Z Due to their increasing spatial resolution, numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and the associated analyses resolve a growing fraction of the gravity wave (GW) spectrum. However, it is unclear how well this “resolved” part of the spectrum truly compares to the actual atmospheric variability. In particular, the Lagrangian variability, relevant, for example, to atmospheric dispersion and to microphysical modeling in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS), has not yet been documented in recent products.To address this shortcoming, this paper presents an assessment of the GW spectrum as a function of the intrinsic (air parcel following) frequency in recent (re)analyses (ERA-Interim, ERA5, the ECMWF operational analysis and MERRA-2). Long-duration, quasi-Lagrangian balloon observations in the equatorial and Antarctic lower stratosphere are used as a reference for the atmospheric spectrum and are compared to synthetic balloon observations along trajectories calculated using the wind and temperature fields of the reanalyses. Overall, the reanalyses represent realistic features of the spectrum, notably the spectral gap between planetary and gravity waves and a peak in horizontal kinetic energy associated with inertial waves near the Coriolis frequency f in the polar region. In the tropics, they represent the slope of the spectrum at low frequency. However, the variability is generally underestimated even in the low-frequency portion of the spectrum. In particular, the near-inertial peak, although present in the reanalyses, has a reduced magnitude compared to balloon observations. We compare the observed and modeled variabilities of temperature, zonal momentum flux and vertical wind speed, which are related to low-, mid- and high-frequency waves, respectively. The probability density function (PDF) distributions have similar shapes but show increasing disagreement with increasing intrinsic frequency. Since at those altitudes they are mainly caused by gravity waves, we also compare the geographic ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Forschungszentrum Jülich: JuSER (Juelich Shared Electronic Resources) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20 15 9331 9350
institution Open Polar
collection Forschungszentrum Jülich: JuSER (Juelich Shared Electronic Resources)
op_collection_id ftfzjuelichnvdb
language English
topic info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550
spellingShingle info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550
Podglajen, Aurelien
Hertzog, Albert
Plougonven, Riwal
Legras, Bernard
Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
topic_facet info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550
description Due to their increasing spatial resolution, numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and the associated analyses resolve a growing fraction of the gravity wave (GW) spectrum. However, it is unclear how well this “resolved” part of the spectrum truly compares to the actual atmospheric variability. In particular, the Lagrangian variability, relevant, for example, to atmospheric dispersion and to microphysical modeling in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS), has not yet been documented in recent products.To address this shortcoming, this paper presents an assessment of the GW spectrum as a function of the intrinsic (air parcel following) frequency in recent (re)analyses (ERA-Interim, ERA5, the ECMWF operational analysis and MERRA-2). Long-duration, quasi-Lagrangian balloon observations in the equatorial and Antarctic lower stratosphere are used as a reference for the atmospheric spectrum and are compared to synthetic balloon observations along trajectories calculated using the wind and temperature fields of the reanalyses. Overall, the reanalyses represent realistic features of the spectrum, notably the spectral gap between planetary and gravity waves and a peak in horizontal kinetic energy associated with inertial waves near the Coriolis frequency f in the polar region. In the tropics, they represent the slope of the spectrum at low frequency. However, the variability is generally underestimated even in the low-frequency portion of the spectrum. In particular, the near-inertial peak, although present in the reanalyses, has a reduced magnitude compared to balloon observations. We compare the observed and modeled variabilities of temperature, zonal momentum flux and vertical wind speed, which are related to low-, mid- and high-frequency waves, respectively. The probability density function (PDF) distributions have similar shapes but show increasing disagreement with increasing intrinsic frequency. Since at those altitudes they are mainly caused by gravity waves, we also compare the geographic ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Podglajen, Aurelien
Hertzog, Albert
Plougonven, Riwal
Legras, Bernard
author_facet Podglajen, Aurelien
Hertzog, Albert
Plougonven, Riwal
Legras, Bernard
author_sort Podglajen, Aurelien
title Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
title_short Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
title_full Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
title_fullStr Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
title_full_unstemmed Lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
title_sort lagrangian gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere of current (re)analyses
publisher EGU
publishDate 2020
url https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885398
https://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22FZJ-2020-03795%22
op_coverage DE
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Atmospheric chemistry and physics 20(15), 9331 - 9350 (2020). doi:10.5194/acp-20-9331-2020
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2128/25863
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000562089000001
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1680-7316
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1680-7324
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-20-9331-2020
https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885398
https://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22FZJ-2020-03795%22
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9331-2020
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 20
container_issue 15
container_start_page 9331
op_container_end_page 9350
_version_ 1810289295380971520