Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf

Benthic marine biodiversity on the Antarctic continental shelf is high and unique, yet its distributional patterns are still relatively poorly understood. Some of the main issues are that biological data are sparse, and that many species are rare and seem only weakly related to environmental conditi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Jansen, Nicole A. Hill, Piers K. Dunstan, Marc P. Eléaume, Craig R. Johnson
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic_Resolution_Functional_Traits_and_the_Influence_of_Species_Groupings_on_Mapping_Antarctic_Seafloor_Biodiversity_pdf/6634544
id ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/6634544
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/6634544 2023-05-15T13:53:43+02:00 Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf Jan Jansen Nicole A. Hill Piers K. Dunstan Marc P. Eléaume Craig R. Johnson 2018-06-21T13:18:44Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001 https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic_Resolution_Functional_Traits_and_the_Influence_of_Species_Groupings_on_Mapping_Antarctic_Seafloor_Biodiversity_pdf/6634544 unknown doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001 https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic_Resolution_Functional_Traits_and_the_Influence_of_Species_Groupings_on_Mapping_Antarctic_Seafloor_Biodiversity_pdf/6634544 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Invasive Species Ecology Landscape Ecology Conservation and Biodiversity Behavioural Ecology Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology) Ecological Physiology Freshwater Ecology Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology) Population Ecology Terrestrial Ecology marine biodiversity Southern Ocean functional trait taxonomic resolution species archetype model species distribution Antarctica benthic assemblages Dataset 2018 ftfrontimediafig https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001 2018-06-27T22:57:48Z Benthic marine biodiversity on the Antarctic continental shelf is high and unique, yet its distributional patterns are still relatively poorly understood. Some of the main issues are that biological data are sparse, and that many species are rare and seem only weakly related to environmental conditions. Grouping species by taxonomic or functional similarity has historically been used to compensate for missing species identification, to generate a more widespread distribution of data-points, and this practice can help to gain a better understanding of the distribution of biodiversity. However, there are few guidelines on how to group species, the implicit assumptions about species associations in the groups are difficult to validate, and the information loss associated with grouping species is unknown. Here, we analyse whether grouping benthic macrofaunal species by taxonomic or functional similarity preserves distributional patterns seen in species distributions, using a model-based approach called “species archetype model” that groups species or other units based on the similarity in their responses to environmental factors. Using presence-absence data, the species archetype models identify twice as many assemblages when used on the highest taxonomic resolution data, than when applied to taxonomic data at lower resolution (e.g., class) or functional groups based on mobility, feeding type, and body shape. Further, confidence in the predictions of either taxonomic or functional groups is far less than for predictions based on the highest taxonomic resolution data. Although using functional groups is often thought to accumulate species with similar environmental responses, our analysis shows that functional groups may insufficiently resolve assemblage structure for presence-absence data. Model-based approaches provide key information to understanding the regional distribution of Antarctic marine biodiversity, and care needs to be taken when using a-priori groupings of species to make statements about the ... Dataset Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean Frontiers: Figshare Antarctic Southern Ocean The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers: Figshare
op_collection_id ftfrontimediafig
language unknown
topic Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
marine biodiversity
Southern Ocean
functional trait
taxonomic resolution
species archetype model
species distribution
Antarctica
benthic assemblages
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
marine biodiversity
Southern Ocean
functional trait
taxonomic resolution
species archetype model
species distribution
Antarctica
benthic assemblages
Jan Jansen
Nicole A. Hill
Piers K. Dunstan
Marc P. Eléaume
Craig R. Johnson
Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf
topic_facet Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
marine biodiversity
Southern Ocean
functional trait
taxonomic resolution
species archetype model
species distribution
Antarctica
benthic assemblages
description Benthic marine biodiversity on the Antarctic continental shelf is high and unique, yet its distributional patterns are still relatively poorly understood. Some of the main issues are that biological data are sparse, and that many species are rare and seem only weakly related to environmental conditions. Grouping species by taxonomic or functional similarity has historically been used to compensate for missing species identification, to generate a more widespread distribution of data-points, and this practice can help to gain a better understanding of the distribution of biodiversity. However, there are few guidelines on how to group species, the implicit assumptions about species associations in the groups are difficult to validate, and the information loss associated with grouping species is unknown. Here, we analyse whether grouping benthic macrofaunal species by taxonomic or functional similarity preserves distributional patterns seen in species distributions, using a model-based approach called “species archetype model” that groups species or other units based on the similarity in their responses to environmental factors. Using presence-absence data, the species archetype models identify twice as many assemblages when used on the highest taxonomic resolution data, than when applied to taxonomic data at lower resolution (e.g., class) or functional groups based on mobility, feeding type, and body shape. Further, confidence in the predictions of either taxonomic or functional groups is far less than for predictions based on the highest taxonomic resolution data. Although using functional groups is often thought to accumulate species with similar environmental responses, our analysis shows that functional groups may insufficiently resolve assemblage structure for presence-absence data. Model-based approaches provide key information to understanding the regional distribution of Antarctic marine biodiversity, and care needs to be taken when using a-priori groupings of species to make statements about the ...
format Dataset
author Jan Jansen
Nicole A. Hill
Piers K. Dunstan
Marc P. Eléaume
Craig R. Johnson
author_facet Jan Jansen
Nicole A. Hill
Piers K. Dunstan
Marc P. Eléaume
Craig R. Johnson
author_sort Jan Jansen
title Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf
title_short Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf
title_full Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf
title_fullStr Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf
title_full_unstemmed Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic Resolution, Functional Traits, and the Influence of Species Groupings on Mapping Antarctic Seafloor Biodiversity.pdf
title_sort data_sheet_1_taxonomic resolution, functional traits, and the influence of species groupings on mapping antarctic seafloor biodiversity.pdf
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic_Resolution_Functional_Traits_and_the_Influence_of_Species_Groupings_on_Mapping_Antarctic_Seafloor_Biodiversity_pdf/6634544
geographic Antarctic
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
op_relation doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_1_Taxonomic_Resolution_Functional_Traits_and_the_Influence_of_Species_Groupings_on_Mapping_Antarctic_Seafloor_Biodiversity_pdf/6634544
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00081.s001
_version_ 1766259091451150336