id ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/19612467
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/19612467 2023-05-15T16:37:06+02:00 DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx Stephan Schennen Sebastian Wetterich Lutz Schirrmeister Georg Schwamborn Jens Tronicke 2022-04-19T04:10:16Z https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.741524.s001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet1_Seasonal_Impact_on_3D_GPR_Performance_for_Surveying_Yedoma_Ice_Complex_Deposits_docx/19612467 unknown doi:10.3389/feart.2022.741524.s001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet1_Seasonal_Impact_on_3D_GPR_Performance_for_Surveying_Yedoma_Ice_Complex_Deposits_docx/19612467 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Solid Earth Sciences Climate Science Atmospheric Sciences not elsewhere classified Exploration Geochemistry Inorganic Geochemistry Isotope Geochemistry Organic Geochemistry Geochemistry not elsewhere classified Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology Ore Deposit Petrology Palaeontology (incl. Palynology) Structural Geology Tectonics Volcanology Geology not elsewhere classified Seismology and Seismic Exploration Glaciology Hydrogeology Natural Hazards Quaternary Environments Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified Evolutionary Impacts of Climate Change GPR seasonal effects resolution yedoma permafrost Dataset 2022 ftfrontimediafig https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.741524.s001 2022-04-20T23:04:18Z Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resistive conditions in frozen ground, resulting in low electromagnetic attenuation and, thus, an increased penetration depth. In permafrost environments, seasonal changes might affect not only GPR performance in terms of vertical resolution, attenuation, and penetration depth, but also regarding the general complexity of data (e.g., due to multiple reflections at thaw boundaries). The experimental setup of our study comparing seasonal differences of summertime thawed and winter- and springtime frozen active layer conditions above ice-rich permafrost allows for estimating advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios. Our results demonstrate major differences in the data and the final GPR image and, thus, will help in future studies to decide about particular survey seasons based on the GPR potential for non-invasive and high-resolution investigations of permafrost properties. Dataset Ice permafrost Frontiers: Figshare
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers: Figshare
op_collection_id ftfrontimediafig
language unknown
topic Solid Earth Sciences
Climate Science
Atmospheric Sciences not elsewhere classified
Exploration Geochemistry
Inorganic Geochemistry
Isotope Geochemistry
Organic Geochemistry
Geochemistry not elsewhere classified
Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
Ore Deposit Petrology
Palaeontology (incl. Palynology)
Structural Geology
Tectonics
Volcanology
Geology not elsewhere classified
Seismology and Seismic Exploration
Glaciology
Hydrogeology
Natural Hazards
Quaternary Environments
Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified
Evolutionary Impacts of Climate Change
GPR
seasonal effects
resolution
yedoma
permafrost
spellingShingle Solid Earth Sciences
Climate Science
Atmospheric Sciences not elsewhere classified
Exploration Geochemistry
Inorganic Geochemistry
Isotope Geochemistry
Organic Geochemistry
Geochemistry not elsewhere classified
Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
Ore Deposit Petrology
Palaeontology (incl. Palynology)
Structural Geology
Tectonics
Volcanology
Geology not elsewhere classified
Seismology and Seismic Exploration
Glaciology
Hydrogeology
Natural Hazards
Quaternary Environments
Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified
Evolutionary Impacts of Climate Change
GPR
seasonal effects
resolution
yedoma
permafrost
Stephan Schennen
Sebastian Wetterich
Lutz Schirrmeister
Georg Schwamborn
Jens Tronicke
DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx
topic_facet Solid Earth Sciences
Climate Science
Atmospheric Sciences not elsewhere classified
Exploration Geochemistry
Inorganic Geochemistry
Isotope Geochemistry
Organic Geochemistry
Geochemistry not elsewhere classified
Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
Ore Deposit Petrology
Palaeontology (incl. Palynology)
Structural Geology
Tectonics
Volcanology
Geology not elsewhere classified
Seismology and Seismic Exploration
Glaciology
Hydrogeology
Natural Hazards
Quaternary Environments
Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified
Evolutionary Impacts of Climate Change
GPR
seasonal effects
resolution
yedoma
permafrost
description Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resistive conditions in frozen ground, resulting in low electromagnetic attenuation and, thus, an increased penetration depth. In permafrost environments, seasonal changes might affect not only GPR performance in terms of vertical resolution, attenuation, and penetration depth, but also regarding the general complexity of data (e.g., due to multiple reflections at thaw boundaries). The experimental setup of our study comparing seasonal differences of summertime thawed and winter- and springtime frozen active layer conditions above ice-rich permafrost allows for estimating advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios. Our results demonstrate major differences in the data and the final GPR image and, thus, will help in future studies to decide about particular survey seasons based on the GPR potential for non-invasive and high-resolution investigations of permafrost properties.
format Dataset
author Stephan Schennen
Sebastian Wetterich
Lutz Schirrmeister
Georg Schwamborn
Jens Tronicke
author_facet Stephan Schennen
Sebastian Wetterich
Lutz Schirrmeister
Georg Schwamborn
Jens Tronicke
author_sort Stephan Schennen
title DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx
title_short DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx
title_full DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx
title_fullStr DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx
title_full_unstemmed DataSheet1_Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits.docx
title_sort datasheet1_seasonal impact on 3d gpr performance for surveying yedoma ice complex deposits.docx
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.741524.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet1_Seasonal_Impact_on_3D_GPR_Performance_for_Surveying_Yedoma_Ice_Complex_Deposits_docx/19612467
genre Ice
permafrost
genre_facet Ice
permafrost
op_relation doi:10.3389/feart.2022.741524.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet1_Seasonal_Impact_on_3D_GPR_Performance_for_Surveying_Yedoma_Ice_Complex_Deposits_docx/19612467
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.741524.s001
_version_ 1766027399579828224