Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf

Urban environments provide the only or best habitats that are left for wildlife in many areas, promoting increased interest in urban conservation and a need to understand how wildlife cope with urban stressors, such as altered predator activity and human disturbance. Here, we used filmed giving-up d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loren L. Fardell, Catherine E. M. Nano, Chris R. Pavey, Christopher R. Dickman
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Small_Prey_Animal_Foraging_Behaviors_in_Landscapes_of_Fear_Effects_of_Predator_Presence_and_Human_Activity_Along_an_Urban_Disturbance_Gradient_pdf/19452605
id ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/19452605
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/19452605 2023-05-15T18:05:45+02:00 Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf Loren L. Fardell Catherine E. M. Nano Chris R. Pavey Christopher R. Dickman 2022-03-30T05:16:50Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Small_Prey_Animal_Foraging_Behaviors_in_Landscapes_of_Fear_Effects_of_Predator_Presence_and_Human_Activity_Along_an_Urban_Disturbance_Gradient_pdf/19452605 unknown doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Small_Prey_Animal_Foraging_Behaviors_in_Landscapes_of_Fear_Effects_of_Predator_Presence_and_Human_Activity_Along_an_Urban_Disturbance_Gradient_pdf/19452605 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Invasive Species Ecology Landscape Ecology Conservation and Biodiversity Behavioural Ecology Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology) Ecological Physiology Freshwater Ecology Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology) Population Ecology Terrestrial Ecology predator-prey risk-sensitive foraging urban biodiversity green space wild space vigilance time allocation foraging Dataset 2022 ftfrontimediafig https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001 2022-03-30T23:03:02Z Urban environments provide the only or best habitats that are left for wildlife in many areas, promoting increased interest in urban conservation and a need to understand how wildlife cope with urban stressors, such as altered predator activity and human disturbance. Here, we used filmed giving-up density experiments to investigate behavioral coping responses of foraging small prey animals at three sites (close, mid, and far) along an urban disturbance gradient. Our study design included “natural” and experimentally added stressor cues of predators and/or human disturbance. We observed small mammal foraging behaviors, particularly: the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), northern brown bandicoot (Isoodon macrourus), brown antechinus (Antechinus stuartii), black rat (Rattus rattus), and brown rat (Rattus norvegicus), and to a lesser degree several species of native birds. We found that at the close urban-edge environment, coping responses to human disturbances were most pronounced, and predator cues from the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) were perceived as least risky. However, at the mid environment, red fox cues were perceived as most risky, especially when combined with human disturbance. At the far environment, domestic cat (Felis catus) cues were perceived as most risky, again when combined with human disturbance. Impacts from the combined stressors of predator and human disturbance cues appeared to be additive, with higher risk being perceived with increasing distance from urban build-up. Behavioral adjustments were observed to be the primary response to stressors by small prey animals in the close environment. In the mid environment, slight temporal shifts in activity across the night were more evident. In the far environment, habitat components were likely being used differently as the primary coping response to stressors. As mostly the same species were observed along the disturbance gradient, our results suggest a level of response plasticity that is calibrated to the level of exposure to a ... Dataset Rattus rattus Frontiers: Figshare
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers: Figshare
op_collection_id ftfrontimediafig
language unknown
topic Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
predator-prey
risk-sensitive foraging
urban biodiversity
green space
wild space
vigilance
time allocation foraging
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
predator-prey
risk-sensitive foraging
urban biodiversity
green space
wild space
vigilance
time allocation foraging
Loren L. Fardell
Catherine E. M. Nano
Chris R. Pavey
Christopher R. Dickman
Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf
topic_facet Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
predator-prey
risk-sensitive foraging
urban biodiversity
green space
wild space
vigilance
time allocation foraging
description Urban environments provide the only or best habitats that are left for wildlife in many areas, promoting increased interest in urban conservation and a need to understand how wildlife cope with urban stressors, such as altered predator activity and human disturbance. Here, we used filmed giving-up density experiments to investigate behavioral coping responses of foraging small prey animals at three sites (close, mid, and far) along an urban disturbance gradient. Our study design included “natural” and experimentally added stressor cues of predators and/or human disturbance. We observed small mammal foraging behaviors, particularly: the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), northern brown bandicoot (Isoodon macrourus), brown antechinus (Antechinus stuartii), black rat (Rattus rattus), and brown rat (Rattus norvegicus), and to a lesser degree several species of native birds. We found that at the close urban-edge environment, coping responses to human disturbances were most pronounced, and predator cues from the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) were perceived as least risky. However, at the mid environment, red fox cues were perceived as most risky, especially when combined with human disturbance. At the far environment, domestic cat (Felis catus) cues were perceived as most risky, again when combined with human disturbance. Impacts from the combined stressors of predator and human disturbance cues appeared to be additive, with higher risk being perceived with increasing distance from urban build-up. Behavioral adjustments were observed to be the primary response to stressors by small prey animals in the close environment. In the mid environment, slight temporal shifts in activity across the night were more evident. In the far environment, habitat components were likely being used differently as the primary coping response to stressors. As mostly the same species were observed along the disturbance gradient, our results suggest a level of response plasticity that is calibrated to the level of exposure to a ...
format Dataset
author Loren L. Fardell
Catherine E. M. Nano
Chris R. Pavey
Christopher R. Dickman
author_facet Loren L. Fardell
Catherine E. M. Nano
Chris R. Pavey
Christopher R. Dickman
author_sort Loren L. Fardell
title Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf
title_short Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf
title_full Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf
title_fullStr Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf
title_full_unstemmed Data_Sheet_1_Small Prey Animal Foraging Behaviors in Landscapes of Fear: Effects of Predator Presence and Human Activity Along an Urban Disturbance Gradient.pdf
title_sort data_sheet_1_small prey animal foraging behaviors in landscapes of fear: effects of predator presence and human activity along an urban disturbance gradient.pdf
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Small_Prey_Animal_Foraging_Behaviors_in_Landscapes_of_Fear_Effects_of_Predator_Presence_and_Human_Activity_Along_an_Urban_Disturbance_Gradient_pdf/19452605
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_relation doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Small_Prey_Animal_Foraging_Behaviors_in_Landscapes_of_Fear_Effects_of_Predator_Presence_and_Human_Activity_Along_an_Urban_Disturbance_Gradient_pdf/19452605
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.805891.s001
_version_ 1766177255552188416