Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov

The similarity of acoustic tasks performed by odontocete (toothed whale) and microchiropteran (insectivorous bat) biosonar suggests they may have common ultrasonic signal reception and processing mechanisms. However, there are also significant media and prey dependent differences, notably speed of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darlene R. Ketten, James A. Simmons, Hiroshi Riquimaroux, Andrea Megela Simmons
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
bat
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002
https://figshare.com/articles/media/Video_2_Functional_Analyses_of_Peripheral_Auditory_System_Adaptations_for_Echolocation_in_Air_vs_Water_mov/16572677
id ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/16572677
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/16572677 2023-05-15T17:59:15+02:00 Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov Darlene R. Ketten James A. Simmons Hiroshi Riquimaroux Andrea Megela Simmons 2021-09-06T04:42:47Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002 https://figshare.com/articles/media/Video_2_Functional_Analyses_of_Peripheral_Auditory_System_Adaptations_for_Echolocation_in_Air_vs_Water_mov/16572677 unknown doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002 https://figshare.com/articles/media/Video_2_Functional_Analyses_of_Peripheral_Auditory_System_Adaptations_for_Echolocation_in_Air_vs_Water_mov/16572677 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Invasive Species Ecology Landscape Ecology Conservation and Biodiversity Behavioural Ecology Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology) Ecological Physiology Freshwater Ecology Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology) Population Ecology Terrestrial Ecology biosonar cochlea basilar membrane stapes inner ear echolocation bat dolphin Dataset Media 2021 ftfrontimediafig https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002 2021-09-08T23:00:32Z The similarity of acoustic tasks performed by odontocete (toothed whale) and microchiropteran (insectivorous bat) biosonar suggests they may have common ultrasonic signal reception and processing mechanisms. However, there are also significant media and prey dependent differences, notably speed of sound and wavelengths in air vs. water, that may be reflected in adaptations in their auditory systems and peak spectra of out-going signals for similarly sized prey. We examined the anatomy of the peripheral auditory system of two species of FM bat (big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus; Japanese house bat Pipistrellus abramus) and two toothed whales (harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena; bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus) using ultra high resolution (11–100 micron) isotropic voxel computed tomography (helical and microCT). Significant differences were found for oval and round window location, cochlear length, basilar membrane gradients, neural distributions, cochlear spiral morphometry and curvature, and basilar membrane suspension distributions. Length correlates with body mass, not hearing ranges. High and low frequency hearing range cut-offs correlate with basilar membrane thickness/width ratios and the cochlear radius of curvature. These features are predictive of high and low frequency hearing limits in all ears examined. The ears of the harbor porpoise, the highest frequency echolocator in the study, had significantly greater stiffness, higher basal basilar membrane ratios, and bilateral bony support for 60% of the basilar membrane length. The porpoise’s basilar membrane includes a “foveal” region with “stretched” frequency representation and relatively constant membrane thickness/width ratio values similar to those reported for some bat species. Both species of bats and the harbor porpoise displayed unusual stapedial input locations and low ratios of cochlear radii, specializations that may enhance higher ultrasonic frequency signal resolution and deter low frequency cochlear propagation. Dataset Phocoena phocoena toothed whale toothed whales Frontiers: Figshare
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers: Figshare
op_collection_id ftfrontimediafig
language unknown
topic Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
biosonar
cochlea
basilar membrane
stapes
inner ear
echolocation
bat
dolphin
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
biosonar
cochlea
basilar membrane
stapes
inner ear
echolocation
bat
dolphin
Darlene R. Ketten
James A. Simmons
Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Andrea Megela Simmons
Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov
topic_facet Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Invasive Species Ecology
Landscape Ecology
Conservation and Biodiversity
Behavioural Ecology
Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
Ecological Physiology
Freshwater Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Population Ecology
Terrestrial Ecology
biosonar
cochlea
basilar membrane
stapes
inner ear
echolocation
bat
dolphin
description The similarity of acoustic tasks performed by odontocete (toothed whale) and microchiropteran (insectivorous bat) biosonar suggests they may have common ultrasonic signal reception and processing mechanisms. However, there are also significant media and prey dependent differences, notably speed of sound and wavelengths in air vs. water, that may be reflected in adaptations in their auditory systems and peak spectra of out-going signals for similarly sized prey. We examined the anatomy of the peripheral auditory system of two species of FM bat (big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus; Japanese house bat Pipistrellus abramus) and two toothed whales (harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena; bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus) using ultra high resolution (11–100 micron) isotropic voxel computed tomography (helical and microCT). Significant differences were found for oval and round window location, cochlear length, basilar membrane gradients, neural distributions, cochlear spiral morphometry and curvature, and basilar membrane suspension distributions. Length correlates with body mass, not hearing ranges. High and low frequency hearing range cut-offs correlate with basilar membrane thickness/width ratios and the cochlear radius of curvature. These features are predictive of high and low frequency hearing limits in all ears examined. The ears of the harbor porpoise, the highest frequency echolocator in the study, had significantly greater stiffness, higher basal basilar membrane ratios, and bilateral bony support for 60% of the basilar membrane length. The porpoise’s basilar membrane includes a “foveal” region with “stretched” frequency representation and relatively constant membrane thickness/width ratio values similar to those reported for some bat species. Both species of bats and the harbor porpoise displayed unusual stapedial input locations and low ratios of cochlear radii, specializations that may enhance higher ultrasonic frequency signal resolution and deter low frequency cochlear propagation.
format Dataset
author Darlene R. Ketten
James A. Simmons
Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Andrea Megela Simmons
author_facet Darlene R. Ketten
James A. Simmons
Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Andrea Megela Simmons
author_sort Darlene R. Ketten
title Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov
title_short Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov
title_full Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov
title_fullStr Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov
title_full_unstemmed Video_2_Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water.mov
title_sort video_2_functional analyses of peripheral auditory system adaptations for echolocation in air vs. water.mov
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002
https://figshare.com/articles/media/Video_2_Functional_Analyses_of_Peripheral_Auditory_System_Adaptations_for_Echolocation_in_Air_vs_Water_mov/16572677
genre Phocoena phocoena
toothed whale
toothed whales
genre_facet Phocoena phocoena
toothed whale
toothed whales
op_relation doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002
https://figshare.com/articles/media/Video_2_Functional_Analyses_of_Peripheral_Auditory_System_Adaptations_for_Echolocation_in_Air_vs_Water_mov/16572677
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216.s002
_version_ 1766168024561221632