Data_Sheet_1_Imprint of Climate Change on Pan-Arctic Marine Vegetation.PDF

• Main Authors: Dorte Krause-Jensen, Philippe Archambault, Jorge Assis, Inka Bartsch, Kai Bischof, Karen Filbee-Dexter, Kenneth H. Dunton, Olga Maximova, Sunna Björk Ragnarsdóttir, Mikael K. Sejr, Uliana Simakova, Vassily Spiridonov, Susse Wegeberg, Mie H. S. Winding, Carlos M. Duarte
• Format: Dataset
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2020
• Subjects: Oceanography; Marine Biology; Marine Geoscience; Biological Oceanography; Chemical Oceanography; Physical Oceanography; Marine Engineering; distribution; abundance; trends; Arctic; sea-ice; warming; eelgrass (Zostera marina); macroalgae; Svalbard; Canada; Greenland; Norway; Climate change; Iceland; Sea ice; Alaska
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.617324.s001; https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Imprint_of_Climate_Change_on_Pan-Arctic_Marine_Vegetation_PDF/13482063

The Arctic climate is changing rapidly. The warming and resultant longer open water periods suggest a potential for expansion of marine vegetation along the vast Arctic coastline. We compiled and reviewed the scattered time series on Arctic marine vegetation and explored trends for macroalgae and eelgrass (Zostera marina). We identified a total of 38 sites, distributed between Arctic coastal regions in Alaska, Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Norway/Svalbard, and Russia, having time series extending into the 21st Century. The majority of these exhibited increase in abundance, productivity or species richness, and/or expansion of geographical distribution limits, several time series showed no significant trend. Only four time series displayed a negative trend, largely due to urchin grazing or increased turbidity. Overall, the observations support with medium confidence (i.e., 5–8 in 10 chance of being correct, adopting the IPCC confidence scale) the prediction that macrophytes are expanding in the Arctic. Species distribution modeling was challenged by limited observations and lack of information on substrate, but suggested a current (2000–2017) potential pan-Arctic macroalgal distribution area of 820.000 km 2 (145.000 km 2 intertidal, 675.000 km 2 subtidal), representing an increase of about 30% for subtidal- and 6% for intertidal macroalgae since 1940–1950, and associated polar migration rates averaging 18–23 km decade –1 . Adjusting the potential macroalgal distribution area by the fraction of shores represented by cliffs halves the estimate (412,634 km 2 ). Warming and reduced sea ice cover along the Arctic coastlines are expected to stimulate further expansion of marine vegetation from boreal latitudes. The changes likely affect the functioning of coastal Arctic ecosystems because of the vegetation’s roles as habitat, and for carbon and nutrient cycling and storage. We encourage a pan-Arctic science- and management agenda to incorporate marine vegetation into a coherent understanding of Arctic changes by ...