Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF

Massive genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) has opened opportunities for analyzing the way in which selection shapes genomes. Artificial or natural selection usually leaves genomic signatures associated with selective sweeps around the responsible locus. Strong selective sweeps are m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oscar Aramburu, Francisco Ceballos, Adrián Casanova, Alan Le Moan, Jakob Hemmer-Hansen, Dorte Bekkevold, Carmen Bouza, Paulino Martínez
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003
https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_3_Genomic_Signatures_After_Five_Generations_of_Intensive_Selective_Breeding_Runs_of_Homozygosity_and_Genetic_Diversity_in_Representative_Domestic_and_Wild_Populations_of_Turbot_Scophthalmus_maximus_PDF/12076857
id ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/12076857
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfrontimediafig:oai:figshare.com:article/12076857 2023-05-15T18:15:48+02:00 Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF Oscar Aramburu Francisco Ceballos Adrián Casanova Alan Le Moan Jakob Hemmer-Hansen Dorte Bekkevold Carmen Bouza Paulino Martínez 2020-04-03T15:08:58Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003 https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_3_Genomic_Signatures_After_Five_Generations_of_Intensive_Selective_Breeding_Runs_of_Homozygosity_and_Genetic_Diversity_in_Representative_Domestic_and_Wild_Populations_of_Turbot_Scophthalmus_maximus_PDF/12076857 unknown doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003 https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_3_Genomic_Signatures_After_Five_Generations_of_Intensive_Selective_Breeding_Runs_of_Homozygosity_and_Genetic_Diversity_in_Representative_Domestic_and_Wild_Populations_of_Turbot_Scophthalmus_maximus_PDF/12076857 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Genetics Genetic Engineering Biomarkers Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination) Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics) Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches) Genome Structure and Regulation Genomics Genetically Modified Animals Livestock Cloning Gene and Molecular Therapy turbot SNP panels runs of homozygosity genetic diversity selective sweep Dataset 2020 ftfrontimediafig https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003 2020-04-08T22:52:48Z Massive genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) has opened opportunities for analyzing the way in which selection shapes genomes. Artificial or natural selection usually leaves genomic signatures associated with selective sweeps around the responsible locus. Strong selective sweeps are most often identified either by lower genetic diversity than the genomic average and/or islands of runs of homozygosity (ROHi). Here, we conducted an analysis of selective sweeps in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) using two SNP datasets from a Northeastern Atlantic population (36 individuals) and a domestic broodstock (46 individuals). Twenty-six families (∼ 40 offspring per family) from this broodstock and three SNP datasets applying differing filtering criteria were used to adjust ROH calling parameters. The best-fitted genomic inbreeding estimate (F ROH ) was obtained by the sum of ROH longer than 1 Mb, called using a 21,615 SNP panel, a sliding window of 37 SNPs and one heterozygous SNP per window allowed. These parameters were used to obtain the ROHi distribution in the domestic and wild populations (49 and 0 ROHi, respectively). Regions with higher and lower genetic diversity within each population were obtained using sliding windows of 37 SNPs. Furthermore, those regions were mapped in the turbot genome against previously reported genetic markers associated with QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) and outlier loci for domestic or natural selection to identify putative selective sweeps. Out of the 319 and 278 windows surpassing the suggestive pooled heterozygosity thresholds (ZHp) in the wild and domestic population, respectively, 78 and 54 were retained under more restrictive ZHp criteria. A total of 116 suggestive windows (representing 19 genomic regions) were linked to either QTL for production traits, or outliers for divergent or balancing selection. Twenty-four of them (representing 3 genomic regions) were retained under stricter ZHp thresholds. Eleven QTL/outlier markers were exclusively found in suggestive regions ... Dataset Scophthalmus maximus Turbot Frontiers: Figshare
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers: Figshare
op_collection_id ftfrontimediafig
language unknown
topic Genetics
Genetic Engineering
Biomarkers
Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination)
Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics)
Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches)
Genome Structure and Regulation
Genomics
Genetically Modified Animals
Livestock Cloning
Gene and Molecular Therapy
turbot
SNP panels
runs of homozygosity
genetic diversity
selective sweep
spellingShingle Genetics
Genetic Engineering
Biomarkers
Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination)
Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics)
Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches)
Genome Structure and Regulation
Genomics
Genetically Modified Animals
Livestock Cloning
Gene and Molecular Therapy
turbot
SNP panels
runs of homozygosity
genetic diversity
selective sweep
Oscar Aramburu
Francisco Ceballos
Adrián Casanova
Alan Le Moan
Jakob Hemmer-Hansen
Dorte Bekkevold
Carmen Bouza
Paulino Martínez
Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF
topic_facet Genetics
Genetic Engineering
Biomarkers
Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination)
Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics)
Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches)
Genome Structure and Regulation
Genomics
Genetically Modified Animals
Livestock Cloning
Gene and Molecular Therapy
turbot
SNP panels
runs of homozygosity
genetic diversity
selective sweep
description Massive genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) has opened opportunities for analyzing the way in which selection shapes genomes. Artificial or natural selection usually leaves genomic signatures associated with selective sweeps around the responsible locus. Strong selective sweeps are most often identified either by lower genetic diversity than the genomic average and/or islands of runs of homozygosity (ROHi). Here, we conducted an analysis of selective sweeps in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) using two SNP datasets from a Northeastern Atlantic population (36 individuals) and a domestic broodstock (46 individuals). Twenty-six families (∼ 40 offspring per family) from this broodstock and three SNP datasets applying differing filtering criteria were used to adjust ROH calling parameters. The best-fitted genomic inbreeding estimate (F ROH ) was obtained by the sum of ROH longer than 1 Mb, called using a 21,615 SNP panel, a sliding window of 37 SNPs and one heterozygous SNP per window allowed. These parameters were used to obtain the ROHi distribution in the domestic and wild populations (49 and 0 ROHi, respectively). Regions with higher and lower genetic diversity within each population were obtained using sliding windows of 37 SNPs. Furthermore, those regions were mapped in the turbot genome against previously reported genetic markers associated with QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) and outlier loci for domestic or natural selection to identify putative selective sweeps. Out of the 319 and 278 windows surpassing the suggestive pooled heterozygosity thresholds (ZHp) in the wild and domestic population, respectively, 78 and 54 were retained under more restrictive ZHp criteria. A total of 116 suggestive windows (representing 19 genomic regions) were linked to either QTL for production traits, or outliers for divergent or balancing selection. Twenty-four of them (representing 3 genomic regions) were retained under stricter ZHp thresholds. Eleven QTL/outlier markers were exclusively found in suggestive regions ...
format Dataset
author Oscar Aramburu
Francisco Ceballos
Adrián Casanova
Alan Le Moan
Jakob Hemmer-Hansen
Dorte Bekkevold
Carmen Bouza
Paulino Martínez
author_facet Oscar Aramburu
Francisco Ceballos
Adrián Casanova
Alan Le Moan
Jakob Hemmer-Hansen
Dorte Bekkevold
Carmen Bouza
Paulino Martínez
author_sort Oscar Aramburu
title Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF
title_short Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF
title_full Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF
title_fullStr Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF
title_full_unstemmed Data_Sheet_3_Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).PDF
title_sort data_sheet_3_genomic signatures after five generations of intensive selective breeding: runs of homozygosity and genetic diversity in representative domestic and wild populations of turbot (scophthalmus maximus).pdf
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003
https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_3_Genomic_Signatures_After_Five_Generations_of_Intensive_Selective_Breeding_Runs_of_Homozygosity_and_Genetic_Diversity_in_Representative_Domestic_and_Wild_Populations_of_Turbot_Scophthalmus_maximus_PDF/12076857
genre Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
genre_facet Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
op_relation doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003
https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_3_Genomic_Signatures_After_Five_Generations_of_Intensive_Selective_Breeding_Runs_of_Homozygosity_and_Genetic_Diversity_in_Representative_Domestic_and_Wild_Populations_of_Turbot_Scophthalmus_maximus_PDF/12076857
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00296.s003
_version_ 1766189019486486528